Steadyberry:I noticed the parents or kids who posted in here are mainly from top schools or better schools. Maybe you do not know many from the neighborhood schools. I remember I got to know a parent with kids in nyps. When they asked me which school my kids are from, they went \"What? Where is the school? Never heard of it.\"
I can tell you, in a neighborhood school, it is not easy to achieve above 230. In a better neighborhood school, kids from 2nd or 3rd class should be able to get 230. I even know quite a few in the 2nd class who got 210 only. But in a not very popular neighborhood school, most of their 1st class kids can only get 230-240. Last yr, 1 neighborhood school had only 5 or 6 who got 250 & above. We are talking about 1st class. When you ask around, you will notice that parents from these schools are happy that their kids can go express or schools like Anderson Sec, BPGH, Riverside Sec, Nan chiau High, zhonghua sec.. To them, these schools are considered as \"very good\" schools. And recently, I heard from a tutor that her student got above 260 in prelims. But the kid added that this is not the best estimate for psle. School teacher told the kid to deduct 20 marks from the prelims.
Sorry if :offtopic:
Remember....all schools are good schools? Haha...so let's not talk about top schools, better schools or Neighbourhood schools here. At least not for primary schools whereby the cohort in each school are from a good mix of HA and average/below average students. Every school has her share of best performing students. I realise the so-called top schools do not have 100% PSLE passes compared to the lesser known Neighbourhood schools. In truth, these Neighbourhood schools really see to the overall performance of their students and ensure that no one is being left out. Every child matters. To me a school is a good and top school when it can bring out the best in every pupil, not just the HA pupils but even the weakest performing pupil.
My 2 kids came from two different so-called Neighbourhood schools. My elder kid's school had about 25 pupils obtaining 250 and above, mainly from the 1st class. My second kid's school had about 40+ pupils obtaining above 250 from 2-3 classes, with 28 from the 1st class. These two Neighbourhood schools were able to produce a fairly good percentage of above average performers. My elder kid's school had 100% PSLE passes almost yearly but my second kid's school which produced 40+ Scorers of 250 & above had 97% passes for that year. The school also did not see 100% passes in other years.
Parents and kids from 'branded' schools are clueless about other Singapore primary schools besides their own? Now look who's being 'sua ku'? How big is Singapore? The sad thing is people tend to measure one's worth from the school one goes to. Be it primary or secondary. The intrinsic value in a person matters no more. It's all about grades and status.
Let me tell you something. The high achievers in most primary schools (mainstream & GEP) are the more worrisome lot. They have good grades and that's it. Good character building in them is next to non-existent. I can attest to that based on my observations and the feedback given after DSA camps in secondary schools. Most of them have over-fed egos. Many are downright spoilt brats and you know by who. Parents need to get radical with their kids that good character is more important than grades.
For me, I am very grateful that that my two kids had moved on to their ideal secondary schools through sheer hard work and determination. One scored 271 and the other 249 for PSLE. To me, both my kids had outperformed themselves and they are bright shining stars in my eyes. With no private tuition, all these would not have been possible without the dedication and support of teachers from their so-called unbranded primary schools.
Whatever results a child has managed in the PSLE, as long as the child has outperformed himself/herself or done his best, that is truly what matters.