zbear:Incidentally, I was talking to an ex-IPJC lecturer/tutor and I asked her the question:With all the discussions about IP JCs/MI, IP students vs JAE students make me wonder
- how do the non IP JCs fare in their A level results?
- Will JAE students be better off in non IP JCs?
- Can JAE students perform equally well as IP students in IP JCs?
:?
Who are usually the ones at the bottom of the cohort at A levels in terms of results ie. the IP or JAE students?
Surprisingly, she said it's the IP students. Her reason: IP students go in via PSLE results and along the way, for some reason, they may not be suitable for the school, especially at JC level, be it culture, curriculum or other things I have no idea about.
The JAE students enter the IPJC using their O levels results which require them to get 2 or 3 points for entry. They are the cream of the crop, so naturally, they tend to do well at A levels as well.
She also mentioned that at the beginning stage of JC1, JAE students tend to do better as they are more exam-smart, but after the transition period, there is no difference in the performance between the IP and JAE students generally.
I am no expert in the topic. Just happened to chance upon this post and thought I could share what was shared with me.