TC’s computer & financial system
-
raysusan:
maybe, as pandora's box opened. good!another possible corruption of JTC?
http://therealsingapore.com/content/possible-corrupt-practice-within-jurong-town-council
but since it is from trs and temasek review, not too sure of authenticity just yet. they have a history of making up scoops. -
Complete waste of time. I am still waiting for somebody to post the managing agent rates for all the town councils. I suppose I can look up all the TC's published accounts. But seriously, this is too lame and I am lazy.
Somebody commented that the scoreline so far is: PAP -1, WP 0
Keep it up, and it will soon be PAP -2, WP 0. -
pirate:
yeah, wp did not come out too good from this. they should cut their losses.Complete waste of time. I am still waiting for somebody to post the managing agent rates for all the town councils. I suppose I can look up all the TC's published accounts. But seriously, this is too lame and I am lazy.
Somebody commented that the scoreline so far is: PAP -1, WP 0
Keep it up, and it will soon be PAP -2, WP 0.
i'm rooting for the underdog but the underdog doesn't smell that clean either more and more. -
winchester:
Question is - is CPIB smelling anything from all these?
yeah, wp did not come out too good from this. they should cut their losses.pirate:
Complete waste of time. I am still waiting for somebody to post the managing agent rates for all the town councils. I suppose I can look up all the TC's published accounts. But seriously, this is too lame and I am lazy.
Somebody commented that the scoreline so far is: PAP -1, WP 0
Keep it up, and it will soon be PAP -2, WP 0.
i'm rooting for the underdog but the underdog doesn't smell that clean either more and more.
-
concern2:
Question is - is CPIB smelling anything from all these?
Not unless some boyfriend or girlfriend makes a report. -
pirate:
concern2:
Question is - is CPIB smelling anything from all these?
Not unless some boyfriend or girlfriend makes a report.
-
Honestly, if PAP gets no kick back from appointing AIM and WP gets no cuts from appointing FMSS, there is no case for CPIB. Cos it is still a contract for service rendered and if the vendor overcharged because PAP or WP did no due diligence to ensure getting the best deal, it will be more of a procedural mistake. Will never be a corrupted practice.
-
winchester:
WP-linked means company owned by WP supporter is it? So what does one call a Party-member-owned company? Wah seh, if so, that would be multiple times the advantage that opposition supporters are getting, man... not to include PAP-supporters owned companies ..how many times more? 80% ? Multiplied by the number of years in the contract...? Or number of months?concern2:
Not trying to side WP, but based on the time period when HG had to find a contractor to do Town Council work, who would dare to have anything to do with THE OPPOSITIONS? There would have been so many questions of 'what if'...correct me if I am wrong.
true. only big companies like cpg, or wp-linked companies like fmss. fmss got $26 million in contracts, not bad for being loyal supporters to wp. :siam:
-
AC_Power:
Honestly, if PAP gets no kick back from appointing AIM and WP gets no cuts from appointing FMSS, there is no case for CPIB. Cos it is still a contract for service rendered and if the vendor overcharged because PAP or WP did no due diligence to ensure getting the best deal, it will be more of a procedural mistake. Will never be a corrupted practice.
You sure or not, AC, no kick - spend $2 to buy toto also got some kick lah..
BTW, CPIB involved only when there is sex and $$ involved is it? :scratchhead: -
concern2:
WP-linked means company owned by WP supporter is it? So what does one call a Party-member-owned company? Wah seh, if so, that would be multiple times the advantage that opposition supporters are getting, man... not to include PAP-supporters owned companies ..how many times more? 80% ? Multiplied by the number of years in the contract...? Or number of months?
:siam:
Company owned by WP supporter = WP-linked company.
Company owned by PAP supporter = Independent third party company.
Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters = Independent third party company with a good track record.
Company controlled by directors who are PAP supporters and beneficially owned by PAP controlled government = Independent third party company with a good track record and strong financial backing.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login