* Eunoia JC (EJC)
-
Ok, so it’s a press release.
-
Based on the way MOE wrote in the presentation slide, "Expected date of completion by end-2019", the confidence level appeared to be high. MOE seemed so confident (even before the soil analysis results) that they could brush off the suggestion to get a new piece of land to build the JC by claiming that such a process would take longer than building on the designated permanent site with all its complexities. I hope it won’t be a case of over confidence on MOE’s part again.
-
lee_yl:
Based on the way MOE wrote in the presentation slide, \"Expected date of completion by end-2019\", the confidence level appeared to be high. MOE seemed so confident (even before the soil analysis results) that they could brush off the suggestion to get a new piece of land to build the JC by claiming that such a process would take longer than building on the designated permanent site with all its complexities. I hope it won't be a case of over confidence on MOE's part again.
By end 2019 would also means those equipment must be tested and ready before school opens for new semester. Laboratory, Library, AV system, all must be ready. -
Just saw the news update from CNA that Mt Sinai will remain as the temp JC till 2019.
-
Mount Sinai will remain holding site for upcoming JC: MOE
Some parents had complained that the Mount Sinai site, at the former Raffles Junior College campus, was \"too far\" for students. However, the Education Ministry says other options such as the former ITE Ang Mo Kio campus, are not suitable.
By Monica Kotwani, Channel NewsAsia
POSTED: 05 Jun 2015 17:59
SINGAPORE: The Ministry of Education (MOE) has announced that Mount Sinai will remain the holding site for a new junior college, until its own campus is ready by the end of 2019. The new junior college will take in its first batch of students in 2017, from Catholic High, Singapore Chinese Girls' School and CHIJ St Nicholas Girls' School.
MOE informed parents of affected students on Friday (Jun 5) of its decision, through email and text message. The decision comes following a review of holding sites closer to the Bishan area, after some parents complained the Mount Sinai site, at the former Raffles Junior College campus, was too far for students.
The use of the Mount Sinai holding site is due to a delay in the building of a new junior college in Bishan, and because the first choice of a holding site for the unnamed junior college was no longer available.
One option for a holding site was the former ITE Ang Mo Kio campus, which MOE initially ruled out as being too small. But it agreed to re-examine the feasibility of the site, after the dialogue with parents at the end of May. After re-assessing the situation, MOE concluded the ITE Ang Mo Kio site was indeed not suitable. For one, it has no lecture theatres. It also has fewer common spaces compared to the Mount Sinai site, MOE said.
The new junior college will offer the six-year Integrated Programme, where students spend the first four years in their secondary schools and the next two years at the junior college.
Some 1,200 students will attend the junior college at the holding site when it opens. They are currently enrolled in the Integrated Programme in the three secondary schools, and are between secondary one and secondary three.
- CNA/ly
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/sin ... 95200.html -
Shame on MOE. Most parents heard the news through the media first and not through text nor email in the first instance. Why go through the press to communicate ? Such high handedness and disrepect for fellow citizens! What happened to the promise to address the questions and inconsistencies brought up in the dialogue. No use taking copious notes when there is no intention to be transparent and fair!
-
:goodpost:
DennisB:
Shame on MOE. Most parents heard the news through the media first and not through text nor email in the first instance. Why go through the press to communicate ? Such high handedness and disrepect for fellow citizens! What happened to the promise to address the questions and inconsistencies brought up in the dialogue. No use taking copious notes when there is no intention to be transparent and fair!
:goodpost: shocked at the bull-dozing! The Zaobao journalist nailed this succinctly that these days people do not accept decisions without clear explanations and do not appreciate the way MOE addressed the issue. She uses the analogy of squeezing toothpaste and how moe only released data bit by bit and all these just don't gel and do not provide a sufficiently robust explanation at all. -
The press release was posted on 5 June but 23 June then we hear some feedback here. Did any more talks with MOE happen between 5 Jun to 23 Jun? :?
-
sushi88:
The press release was posted on 5 June but 23 June then we hear some feedback here.
心灰意冷 -
No news no dialogue; inconsistencies and questions asked unanswered …no accountability at all
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login