* Eunoia JC (EJC)

[floppy]

If it rains tomorrow, should we conclude Singapore ALWAYS rain and if it doesn’t, Singapore NEVER rains. Neither conclusion is true since it’s the average over a period of time that we are interested in.


DHS result is not poor, neither is EJC result exceptionally good. They are just what you would expect. Fluctuations are normal on a y-o-y basis and par-for-the-course. Based on 3-yr trending, both are good.

[lee_yl]

Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017670\" time=\"1615818944\" user_id=\"191857:

lee_yl\" post_id=\"2017652\" time=\"1615812377\" user_id=\"17023:

Your logic is very funny. Results dropped must be due to JAE students. Results improved must be due to IP students. Are you sure?? :skeptical:

You so clever then pls comment on the JAE students’ performance for RI and HCI.

Qms shared HCI JAE only < 30%, that may explained why HCI always top 1 or 2 now.

Then you comment on Dhs sudden poor results.

Ah... HCI JAE only < 30% so HCI top 1 or 2.

Oh then last time DHS 100% IP students only then shouldn’t it be the TOP school in SG?

Going by your logic, NYJC with 100% JAE students, does this make it the worst school?

My point is, there are many other factors, not just go by % of JAE.

[Whyyhw]

lee_yl\" post_id=\"2017674\" time=\"1615820531\" user_id=\"17023:

Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017670\" time=\"1615818944\" user_id=\"191857:

[quote=lee_yl post_id=2017652 time=1615812377 user_id=17023]Your logic is very funny. Results dropped must be due to JAE students. Results improved must be due to IP students. Are you sure?? :skeptical:

You so clever then pls comment on the JAE students’ performance for RI and HCI.

Qms shared HCI JAE only < 30%, that may explained why HCI always top 1 or 2 now.

Then you comment on Dhs sudden poor results.

Ah... HCI JAE only < 30% so HCI top 1 or 2.

Oh then last time DHS 100% IP students only then shouldn’t it be the TOP school in SG?

Going by your logic, NYJC with 100% JAE students, does this make it the worst school?

My point is, there are many other factors, not just go by % of JAE.[/quote]Previously Dhs with full IP, didnt get to top so explains its std compared to HCI/RI.

What other factors caused results to dip so drastically lei ? Care to share, pls.

Ejc after shifted to new big site, didnt up its JAE intake.

[lee_yl]

Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017675\" time=\"1615821781\" user_id=\"191857:

lee_yl\" post_id=\"2017674\" time=\"1615820531\" user_id=\"17023:

[quote=Whyyhw post_id=2017670 time=1615818944 user_id=191857]

Qms shared HCI JAE only < 30%, that may explained why HCI always top 1 or 2 now.

Then you comment on Dhs sudden poor results.

Ah... HCI JAE only < 30% so HCI top 1 or 2.

Oh then last time DHS 100% IP students only then shouldn’t it be the TOP school in SG?

Going by your logic, NYJC with 100% JAE students, does this make it the worst school?

My point is, there are many other factors, not just go by % of JAE.

Previously Dhs with full IP, didnt get to top so explains its std compared to HCI/RI.

What other factors caused results to dip so drastically lei ? Care to share, pls.

Ejc after shifted to new big site, didnt up its JAE intake.[/quote]Oh, so EJC didn’t up its JAE intake, kept constant, 60% 40%, but its results improved! Ah then EJC is growing from strength to strength !!

You didn’t rebut to the statement highlighted in red which means you agreed with it?

[Whyyhw]

lee_yl\" post_id=\"2017676\" time=\"1615824441\" user_id=\"17023:

Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017675\" time=\"1615821781\" user_id=\"191857:

[quote=lee_yl post_id=2017674 time=1615820531 user_id=17023]

Ah... HCI JAE only < 30% so HCI top 1 or 2.

Oh then last time DHS 100% IP students only then shouldn’t it be the TOP school in SG?

Going by your logic, NYJC with 100% JAE students, does this make it the worst school?

My point is, there are many other factors, not just go by % of JAE.

Previously Dhs with full IP, didnt get to top so explains its std compared to HCI/RI.

What other factors caused results to dip so drastically lei ? Care to share, pls.

Ejc after shifted to new big site, didnt up its JAE intake.

Oh, so EJC didn’t up its JAE intake, kept constant, 60% 40%, but its results improved! Ah then EJC is growing from strength to strength !!

You didn’t rebut to the statement highlighted in red which means you agreed with it?[/quote]With its big cohort ip, its expected from Ejc but still need see its future results to firm its status or wait til its Jae intake is increased.

[floppy]

What other factors caused results to dip?


1. Weather.
2. A butterfly flaps its wings in the distance.

P/S: “Drastically” is an overdramatized and exaggerated expression. The results are well within the standard range of movement.

[Whyyhw]

floppy\" post_id=\"2017678\" time=\"1615827342\" user_id=\"97579:

What other factors caused results to dip?

1. Weather.
2. A butterfly flaps its wings in the distance.

P/S: “Drastically” is an overdramatized and exaggerated expression. The results are well within the standard range of movement.

When 1 is in denial mindset, they bring out scientific reason.
Yes,butterfly effect says small changes can have large consequences-
Dhs small % jae caused a sharp dip in its results, while causing RV aldy mid ranged results to dip further this time.

Ejc wd'nt want to take risk to up its Jae intake.
Ejc total intake hovers 600 with big campus while others intake close 700 or more.



\"The results are well within the standard range of movement\"- not amongst top tier jcs.

[Dino]

Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017687\" time=\"1615849202\" user_id=\"191857:

floppy\" post_id=\"2017678\" time=\"1615827342\" user_id=\"97579:

What other factors caused results to dip?

1. Weather.
2. A butterfly flaps its wings in the distance.

P/S: “Drastically” is an overdramatized and exaggerated expression. The results are well within the standard range of movement.

When 1 is in denial mindset, they bring out scientific reason.
Yes,butterfly effect says small changes can have large consequences-
Dhs small % jae caused a sharp dip in its results, while causing RV aldy mid ranged results to dip further this time.

Ejc wd'nt want to take risk to up its Jae intake.
Ejc total intake hovers 600 with big campus while others intake close 700 or more.



\"The results are well within the standard range of movement\"- not amongst top tier jcs.

You seem to look down on JAE, don't you...... Whatever good must be from the IP, whatever not good must be due to the JAE...... You very elite thinking hor.......

[phtthp]

Which is (are) the IP-JCs (A-level)

in Singapore,

that have an equal weightage of A-level students (If any) ?

that is, constituted

(50% IP + another 50% JAE ) students


Or

is it that

All IP-JCs (A-level) in reality have more (a higher percentage / proportion ) IP students, than the JAE intake, a decision made by the top ( MOE ) ?

[doodbug]

I believe (teachers here, please feel free to comment) the intake numbers are solely determined by MOE.

Even for independent schools, they cannot set their own intake numbers. Only private international schools can.
No school can suddenly increase intake by 100 JAE a year - it has to be planned for and catered for by MOE because you need to have the teachers posted in to teach the additional students! Teacher deployment is by MOE, except for teachers which are directly employed by independent schools. (However EJC is not an independent school and teacher numbers and deployment are solely determined by MOE.) Independent schools do have a proportion of directly contracted teachers, as well as a sizable pool of MOE teachers.