* Eunoia JC (EJC)
-
lee_yl\" post_id=\"2017676\" time=\"1615824441\" user_id=\"17023:
Oh, so EJC didn’t up its JAE intake, kept constant, 60% 40%, but its results improved! Ah then EJC is growing from strength to strength !!
Previously Dhs with full IP, didnt get to top so explains its std compared to HCI/RI.Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017675\" time=\"1615821781\" user_id=\"191857:
[quote=lee_yl post_id=2017674 time=1615820531 user_id=17023]
Ah... HCI JAE only < 30% so HCI top 1 or 2.
Oh then last time DHS 100% IP students only then shouldn’t it be the TOP school in SG?
Going by your logic, NYJC with 100% JAE students, does this make it the worst school?
My point is, there are many other factors, not just go by % of JAE.
What other factors caused results to dip so drastically lei ? Care to share, pls.
Ejc after shifted to new big site, didnt up its JAE intake.
You didn’t rebut to the statement highlighted in red which means you agreed with it?[/quote]With its big cohort ip, its expected from Ejc but still need see its future results to firm its status or wait til its Jae intake is increased. -
What other factors caused results to dip?
1. Weather.
2. A butterfly flaps its wings in the distance.
P/S: “Drastically” is an overdramatized and exaggerated expression. The results are well within the standard range of movement. -
floppy\" post_id=\"2017678\" time=\"1615827342\" user_id=\"97579:
When 1 is in denial mindset, they bring out scientific reason.
What other factors caused results to dip?
1. Weather.
2. A butterfly flaps its wings in the distance.
P/S: “Drastically” is an overdramatized and exaggerated expression. The results are well within the standard range of movement.
Yes,butterfly effect says small changes can have large consequences-
Dhs small % jae caused a sharp dip in its results, while causing RV aldy mid ranged results to dip further this time.
Ejc wd'nt want to take risk to up its Jae intake.
Ejc total intake hovers 600 with big campus while others intake close 700 or more.
\"The results are well within the standard range of movement\"- not amongst top tier jcs. -
Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017687\" time=\"1615849202\" user_id=\"191857:
You seem to look down on JAE, don't you...... Whatever good must be from the IP, whatever not good must be due to the JAE...... You very elite thinking hor.......
When 1 is in denial mindset, they bring out scientific reason.floppy\" post_id=\"2017678\" time=\"1615827342\" user_id=\"97579:
What other factors caused results to dip?
1. Weather.
2. A butterfly flaps its wings in the distance.
P/S: “Drastically” is an overdramatized and exaggerated expression. The results are well within the standard range of movement.
Yes,butterfly effect says small changes can have large consequences-
Dhs small % jae caused a sharp dip in its results, while causing RV aldy mid ranged results to dip further this time.
Ejc wd'nt want to take risk to up its Jae intake.
Ejc total intake hovers 600 with big campus while others intake close 700 or more.
\"The results are well within the standard range of movement\"- not amongst top tier jcs. -
Which is (are) the IP-JCs (A-level)
in Singapore,
that have an equal weightage of A-level students (If any) ?
that is, constituted
(50% IP + another 50% JAE ) students
Or
is it that
All IP-JCs (A-level) in reality have more (a higher percentage / proportion ) IP students, than the JAE intake, a decision made by the top ( MOE ) ? -
I believe (teachers here, please feel free to comment) the intake numbers are solely determined by MOE.
Even for independent schools, they cannot set their own intake numbers. Only private international schools can.
No school can suddenly increase intake by 100 JAE a year - it has to be planned for and catered for by MOE because you need to have the teachers posted in to teach the additional students! Teacher deployment is by MOE, except for teachers which are directly employed by independent schools. (However EJC is not an independent school and teacher numbers and deployment are solely determined by MOE.) Independent schools do have a proportion of directly contracted teachers, as well as a sizable pool of MOE teachers. -
doodbug\" post_id=\"2017708\" time=\"1615873617\" user_id=\"13281:
That was what I heard a few years ago when attending a school talk. Cannot suka suka increase or decrease proportion of IP and JAE. All decisions are made by MOE.
I believe (teachers here, please feel free to comment) the intake numbers are solely determined by MOE.
Even for independent schools, they cannot set their own intake numbers. Only private international schools can.
No school can suddenly increase intake by 100 JAE a year - it has to be planned for and catered for by MOE because you need to have the teachers posted in to teach the additional students! Teacher deployment is by MOE, except for teachers which are directly employed by independent schools. (However EJC is not an independent school and teacher numbers and deployment are solely determined by MOE.) Independent schools do have a proportion of directly contracted teachers, as well as a sizable pool of MOE teachers. -
ngl2010\" post_id=\"2017732\" time=\"1615888910\" user_id=\"40978:
So moe has always wanted HCI/RI to be top 1 or 2 by having more ip kids?
That was what I heard a few years ago when attending a school talk. Cannot suka suka increase or decrease proportion of IP and JAE. All decisions are made by MOE.doodbug\" post_id=\"2017708\" time=\"1615873617\" user_id=\"13281:
I believe (teachers here, please feel free to comment) the intake numbers are solely determined by MOE.
Even for independent schools, they cannot set their own intake numbers. Only private international schools can.
No school can suddenly increase intake by 100 JAE a year - it has to be planned for and catered for by MOE because you need to have the teachers posted in to teach the additional students! Teacher deployment is by MOE, except for teachers which are directly employed by independent schools. (However EJC is not an independent school and teacher numbers and deployment are solely determined by MOE.) Independent schools do have a proportion of directly contracted teachers, as well as a sizable pool of MOE teachers.
Dhs and Rv have 80% ip kids inside but this time results plunged.
Moe also plan to maintain Ejc std by maintaining its 60% ip kids. -
If you want to be called an "IP-JC", then Yes,
believed that
the percentage of IP students will always exceed that of JAE. Moe decide what targeted %tage of IP students to set at, for admission.
Otherwise,
why would people even name & call them "IP-JC" (A-level), in the very first place ?
Hwa Chong : 70% (IP), 30% (JAE)
Dunman High and River Valley High : 80 % (IP), 20% (JAE)
Eunoia JC : 60 % (IP), but Eunoia is different from Hwa Chong/ Dunman High / River Valley High
Why different ?
Because
EJC come from 3 different Secondary schools, not from your usual standard 2 schools (boys Hwa Chong side and Girls from Nanyang Girls High side)
Nor like the 2 standard boys Victoria school & Cedar Girls Sec
Temasek JC : ? Percentage of IP vs. JAE ?
Victoria JC ? Percentage of IP ?
National JC ?
RI ? -
Whyyhw\" post_id=\"2017923\" time=\"1616076595\" user_id=\"191857:
So moe has always wanted HCI/RI to be top 1 or 2 by having more ip kids?
That was what I heard a few years ago when attending a school talk. Cannot suka suka increase or decrease proportion of IP and JAE. All decisions are made by MOE.ngl2010\" post_id=\"2017732\" time=\"1615888910\" user_id=\"40978:
[quote=doodbug post_id=2017708 time=1615873617 user_id=13281]I believe (teachers here, please feel free to comment) the intake numbers are solely determined by MOE.
Even for independent schools, they cannot set their own intake numbers. Only private international schools can.
No school can suddenly increase intake by 100 JAE a year - it has to be planned for and catered for by MOE because you need to have the teachers posted in to teach the additional students! Teacher deployment is by MOE, except for teachers which are directly employed by independent schools. (However EJC is not an independent school and teacher numbers and deployment are solely determined by MOE.) Independent schools do have a proportion of directly contracted teachers, as well as a sizable pool of MOE teachers.
Dhs and Rv have 80% ip kids inside but this time results plunged.
Moe also plan to maintain Ejc std by maintaining its 60% ip kids.[/quote]Top 1 or 2 JCs must have more IP kids?
Are you insulting NYJC which has zero IP kids?
What is the point of your your question?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login