Logo
    • Education
      • Pre-School
      • Primary Schools Directory
      • Primary Schools Articles
      • P1 Registration
      • DSA
      • PSLE
      • Secondary
      • Tertiary
      • Special Needs
    • Lifestyle
      • Well-being
    • Activities
      • Events
    • Enrichment & Services
      • Find A Service Provider
      • Enrichment Articles
      • Enrichment Services
      • Tuition Centre/Private Tutor
      • Infant Care/ Childcare / Student Care Centre
      • Kindergarten/Preschool
      • Private Institutions and International Schools
      • Special Needs
      • Indoor & Outdoor Playgrounds
      • Paediatrics
      • Neonatal Care
    • Forum
    • ASKQ
    • Register
    • Login

    Choosing and Evaluating Primary Schools

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Primary Schools - Selection & Registration
    3.6k Posts 838 Posters 1.1m Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • L Offline
      Lottisim
      last edited by

      Round 2B day 1 results are out not sure if calling the school will they advise <2km has exceeded the vacancies ?


      Any fellow parents have tried calling the sch to check ?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • StevenageS Offline
        Stevenage
        last edited by

        Lottisim\" post_id=\"2031922\" time=\"1627301499\" user_id=\"194046:

        Round 2B day 1 results are out not sure if calling the school will they advise <2km has exceeded the vacancies ?

        Any fellow parents have tried calling the sch to check ?
        It's really up the to school to determine if they are willing to reveal the number but do bear in mind the figures are just preliminaries and are likely to move as the Phase progresses.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          Aztac
          last edited by

          F3parent\" post_id=\"2029281\" time=\"1625479041\" user_id=\"165232:

          CALYNSEA\" post_id=\"2029277\" time=\"1625475222\" user_id=\"181903:

          [quote=\"zac's mum\" post_id=2029276 time=1625474934 user_id=53606]
          There’s an affiliated primary:
          https://stmargaretspri.moe.edu.sg/

          I mean the one near Nanyang Pri School. Cos was thinking they were talking about missing out on Nanyang so means she stay near Nanyang thus the one nearby.

          St.Margarets usually has space in 2CS as well, and its not too far from that general area
          otherwise catchment schools are usually BTPS and FPPS[/quote]Just saw this, apart from 2016 and 2019, SMPS usually does NOT have any spaces left in 2CS. https://elite.com.sg/228091


          I believe 2019's intake was low because in 2020 the school would move to its temporary site in Mattar road and thus many shun it due to it being \"too far\" from its Wilkie road location for those living within 2Km from Wilkie road. Last year at 2C there was a ballot for non SC.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            Prchan
            last edited by

            floppy\" post_id=\"2030849\" time=\"1626444056\" user_id=\"97579:

            Prchan\" post_id=\"2030827\" time=\"1626437295\" user_id=\"193880:

            Hi am considering 2 options for my son. Seeking others opinions cos phase 2B is just round the corner. Should I forego PRPS and go for SSS as it has affiliations? Not sure if it’s a wise choice. Any opinions? My options:
            1. Pasir Ris Primary School (phase2B) - distance within 1km
            2. St stephens school (phase2C) - distance 10km

            Having affiliation is great, but having to travel 10km 5x a week for 6 years for affiliation benefit is not so great.


            Thanks for advise! We are still thinking about this. Anyone knows how did PRPS did in PSLE 2020?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • zac's mumZ Offline
              zac's mum
              last edited by

              Ministry of Education has changed its tune now? No more “every school a good school” but they admit and acknowledge that there’s a best fit school for each child?


              Parliament: MPs want to see more efforts made to check on students’ mental health and bullying in schools
              https://www.todayonline.com/node/12037816

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • floppyF Offline
                floppy
                last edited by

                zac's mum\" post_id=\"2032018\" time=\"1627424715\" user_id=\"53606:[quote=\"zac's mum\" post_id=2032018 time=1627424715 user_id=53606]
                Ministry of Education has changed its tune now? No more “every school a good school” but they admit and acknowledge that there’s a best fit school for each child?

                Parliament: MPs want to see more efforts made to check on students’ mental health and bullying in schools
                https://www.todayonline.com/node/12037816[/quote]
                I don’t think the Ministry has changed it’s tune. MOE focus has always been in providing quality education, and it has done well. The politicians, on the other hand…

                “Every school, a good school” may be an aspirational message, it was never a good one to begin with. Most people are well aware of the disparity in resources and quality in every school. MOE should be applauded for trying to move the leadership positions around the schools, but the principal isn’t able to overcome any structural shortcomings that the school has.

                By the way, a “best fit” school is also a problematic message, especially for P1 registration. I don’t think anyone wants to be in a ill-fitting school, especially one where I don’t get to choose but landed up in, because all the “fit” schools have already been taken up.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • zac's mumZ Offline
                  zac's mum
                  last edited by

                  floppy\" post_id=\"2032021\" time=\"1627432092\" user_id=\"97579:

                  zac's mum\" post_id=\"2032018\" time=\"1627424715\" user_id=\"53606:[quote=\"zac's mum\" post_id=2032018 time=1627424715 user_id=53606]Ministry of Education has changed its tune now? No more “every school a good school” but they admit and acknowledge that there’s a best fit school for each child?

                  Parliament: MPs want to see more efforts made to check on students’ mental health and bullying in schools
                  https://www.todayonline.com/node/12037816
                  I don’t think the Ministry has changed it’s tune. MOE focus has always been in providing quality education, and it has done well. The politicians, on the other hand…

                  “Every school, a good school” may be an aspirational message, it was never a good one to begin with. Most people are well aware of the disparity in resources and quality in every school. MOE should be applauded for trying to move the leadership positions around the schools, but the principal isn’t able to overcome any structural shortcomings that the school has.

                  By the way, a “best fit” school is also a problematic message, especially for P1 registration. I don’t think anyone wants to be in a ill-fitting school, especially one where I don’t get to choose but landed up in, because all the “fit” schools have already been taken up.[/quote]
                  In the context of the article, I think it’s the other way. Rather than landing up in a 2CS school becos all the hot schools have been taken up, he was referring to parents enrolling kids into a hot school without considering if it’s the best fit for the child.

                  But I get what you mean by we don’t always have a choice. Imagine if u have 4 kids and all different personality, u still have to use Phase 1 and stick with it for convenience of transport. Also if u have a sure-in 2A1 priority, u will still have to use it even if bad fit, Eg. If your next door school has crazy balloting at 2C.

                  Quote:
                  “Mr Chan said putting a child in a popular school may do more harm than good if it is a bad fit.”

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • O Offline
                    Orb
                    last edited by

                    zac's mum\" post_id=\"2032030\" time=\"1627441360\" user_id=\"53606:[quote=\"zac's mum\" post_id=2032030 time=1627441360 user_id=53606]
                    floppy\" post_id=\"2032021\" time=\"1627432092\" user_id=\"97579:
                    [quote=\"zac's mum\" post_id=2032018 time=1627424715 user_id=53606]Ministry of Education has changed its tune now? No more “every school a good school” but they admit and acknowledge that there’s a best fit school for each child?

                    Parliament: MPs want to see more efforts made to check on students’ mental health and bullying in schools
                    https://www.todayonline.com/node/12037816
                    I don’t think the Ministry has changed it’s tune. MOE focus has always been in providing quality education, and it has done well. The politicians, on the other hand…

                    “Every school, a good school” may be an aspirational message, it was never a good one to begin with. Most people are well aware of the disparity in resources and quality in every school. MOE should be applauded for trying to move the leadership positions around the schools, but the principal isn’t able to overcome any structural shortcomings that the school has.

                    By the way, a “best fit” school is also a problematic message, especially for P1 registration. I don’t think anyone wants to be in a ill-fitting school, especially one where I don’t get to choose but landed up in, because all the “fit” schools have already been taken up.[/quote]
                    In the context of the article, I think it’s the other way. Rather than landing up in a 2CS school becos all the hot schools have been taken up, he was referring to parents enrolling kids into a hot school without considering if it’s the best fit for the child.

                    But I get what you mean by we don’t always have a choice. Imagine if u have 4 kids and all different personality, u still have to use Phase 1 and stick with it for convenience of transport. Also if u have a sure-in 2A1 priority, u will still have to use it even if bad fit, Eg. If your next door school has crazy balloting at 2C.

                    Quote:
                    “Mr Chan said putting a child in a popular school may do more harm than good if it is a bad fit.”[/quote]Parents mentality need to change first. putting kid into top schools (GEP, SAP, Branded) doesn't guarantee the child will do well at end of primary school education.

                    There are too many examples of pupils not doing well from these schools and ended up in N(A), N(T) as well as affiliates not making back to their affiliated secondary schools.

                    Until mindsets change, every year is a repeated story of the usual suspects heading into balloting as early as 2A1.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • floppyF Offline
                      floppy
                      last edited by

                      Orb\" post_id=\"2032031\" time=\"1627441817\" user_id=\"25015:

                      zac's mum\" post_id=\"2032030\" time=\"1627441360\" user_id=\"53606:[quote=\"zac's mum\" post_id=2032030 time=1627441360 user_id=53606]

                      Parents mentality need to change first. putting kid into top schools (GEP, SAP, Branded) doesn't guarantee the child will do well at end of primary school education.

                      There are too many examples of pupils not doing well from these schools and ended up in N(A), N(T) as well as affiliates not making back to their affiliated secondary schools.

                      Until mindsets change, every year is a repeated story of the usual suspects heading into balloting as early as 2A1.

                      \"Parents mentality need to change first. putting kid into top schools (GEP, SAP, Branded) doesn't guarantee the child will do well at end of primary school education. \"

                      While I hear what you say, I understand zac's mum issue as well.

                      I may not want to put my child in a GEP or SAP school because it \"doesn't fit\" (without even considering the personalities of multiple children). However, the nearby school that \"fit\" faces balloting at Phase 2C and is not a guaranteed whereas I have guaranteed placement in a GEP or SAP school at Phase 2A1 or 2A2. What are my options?
                      - Go for a \"fit\" school but may end up in a Phase 2CS school which also \"doesn't fit\" (or worst, unwanted); or
                      - Go for a \"doesn't fit\" school but without ballot?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • phtthpP Offline
                        phtthp
                        last edited by

                        Orb\" post_id=\"2032031\" time=\"1627441817\" user_id=\"25015:

                        zac's mum\" post_id=\"2032030\" time=\"162744:[quote=\"zac's mum\" post_id=2032030 time=162744]In the context of the article, I think it’s the other way. Rather than landichool becos all the hot schools have been taken up, he was referring to parents enrolling kids into a hot school without considering if it’s the best fit for the child.

                        But I get what you mean by we don’t always have a choice. Imagine if u have 4 kids and all different personality, u still have to use Phase 1 and stick with it for convenience of transport. Also if u have a sure-in 2A1 priority, u will still have to use it even if bad fit, Eg. If your next door school has crazy balloting at 2C.

                        Quote:
                        “Mr Chan said putting a child in a popular school may do more harm than good if it is a bad fit.”
                        Parents mentality need to change first. putting kid into top schools (GEP, SAP, Branded) doesn't guarantee the child will do well at end of primary school education.

                        There are too many examples of pupils not doing well from these schools and ended up in N(A), N(T) as well as affiliates not making back to their affiliated secondary schools.

                        Until mindsets change, every year is a repeated story of the usual suspects heading into balloting as early as 2A1.[/quote]
                        Due to the high costs of living in Singapore, parents nowadays seldom have 4 kids, unless they are from well to do family.

                        Commonly found in Singapore families are usually 2 kids, because having one child is just too lonely ! 2 is just nice, because siblings can talk and play together, keep each other company, not so lonely. Sometimes, families do have 3 kids too. Eg. In some Non-Chinese speaking families, where 3 is the minimum


                        For logistic purposes,
                        for families with 2 or 3 kids, is easier to enrol them into the same primary school. Eg. take the same school bus


                        If a child face difficulty coping in a highly stressed academic school, it makes sense for parents to transfer them out to a lesser known school, that is not so popular, less competitive.

                        However,
                        on the other hand, parents at times faced dilemma too.
                        Why ?

                        Because
                        Principal(s) of the \"Applied-Transfer-To \" schools sometimes do not want to consider nor accept students who are not doing well, in their originating schools,
                        even though
                        parents do want to transfer their child out, into lesser academic stressed schools. This is an issue, unless the Principal(s) of these schools are compassionate

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 318
                        • 319
                        • 320
                        • 321
                        • 322
                        • 357
                        • 358
                        • 320 / 358
                        • First post
                          Last post



                        Online Users
                        MandyLibM
                        MandyLib

                        Statistics

                        7

                        Online

                        210.7k

                        Users

                        34.2k

                        Topics

                        1.8m

                        Posts
                        Popular Topics
                        New to the KiasuParents forum? Tips and Tricks!
                        Choosing and Evaluating Primary Schools
                        DSA 2026
                        PSLE Discussions and Strategies
                        How much do you spend on the kids' tuition/enrichments?
                        SkillsFuture + anything related to upskilling/learning something new!

                          About Us Contact Us forum Terms of Service Privacy Policy