DSA 2024
-
Agree with above posts - all have credence. The chosen has both competence and connection/network; but not necessarily best in talent.
This is because the “in the know” parents have already identified which sports coaches are advising and/or connected to the IP schools they are aiming for. If kid is showing some performance, they seek the particular coach out to take their child in as disciple. Even if the coach is already the primary school coach, the parents will pay for EXTRA training lessons, holiday sports training or overseas training camps. Plus the better trained are selected for school/national team etc. The others with much talent just need so much more talent to mayxh up with the resourced competent.
One of my friends even built a pool at home to ensure child can do daily laps - that was useful during Covid lockdowns.
With proper practice and of course, hard work, the kid is coached under the respective coaches who then recommend them to their secondary selection teachers.
A colleague with a kindergarten child once asked a group of us how to get sports DSA and one mother of DSA athlete replied that if you have to ask for a child already in upper primary school sports , then you are not likely to get it. The sport coach the child is under will already have recommended him and the teacher in charge of the IP sports team will have already approached by p4-5 to “sell” the parent and child the benefits of the potential school team they are looking to build.
One caveat parents hv to note on DSA is the child has to commit to the sport throughout. Unless the kid lives breathes it, then it will be cruel to force him/her into this cca for full 6 yrs when the child could have explored and expanded other interests. This includes math/science domains… as the child may then find out that he/she is interested in journalism or debate but have no time left if expected to train and compete only in Math Olympiads. This will also apply to SOTA too as you will have to commit to the art domains- visual , performance etc. Perhaps, parents should check on the commitment requirements/restrictions. Say if a child goes in the DSA school on Math but decides he/she likes Biology better? Or goes in on Badminton but decides they prefer Tennis? Only school I know that uses math/science DSA and then no commitment on the child to do ONLY math or science is NUSHigh. I am sure parents with experience can share more on their respective schools. -
backdoor or "pay to get in" method,
When the child is AL 20 (prelim) and child / parents want to go RI via the above methods,
the parents want to child to die meh?
rubbing shoulders with the better kids only works to a certain extent. -
Yes, totally agree with u, lucid.
That’s why no matter what, children from rich, privileged families, are always at an advantage, over kids from poor families.
Why ?
Because parents loaded $ will start training their kid, from as young as kindergarten K1 / K2 five or six years old onwards, to train for tennis, golf, whatever other exiting or exotic games / Sports, that will land them a high chance to DSA into Top schools by the time their child reaches Upper primary level.
On the other hand, of course if a child after training so much but no talent in that Sports or lost interest along the way, then, that’s a separate story. -
We have been talking unfair advantage: “Born rich”. We think those get into good school because they are born into rich family. The family can afford to send them to extra sport coaching since young. Maybe can even afford to build a stadium for the child to train. How about those “born smart”? No need tuition, can score AL4 in PSLE and get into RI. Why we never complain it’s not fair these students are born smart, whereas other students are not as “lucky”?
-
If u are born smart, from poor family, u still can DSA under Academic. Even if u don’t wish to DSA, u still can use your PSLE good score, to enter.
-
The idea and intention of DSA was never fair in the 1st place when admission is pegged at academic merit for the general masses. How do you assess fairness when a school cop is for example 6 and the hurdle for DSA is not more than 20 for the same school. Unless the whole masses can be convinced that 1 unit of whatever talent used to DSA has the same value as 1 unit of academic excellence. Since not everyone will be convinced, this fairness debate will forever exist.
-
phtthp\" post_id=\"2128668\" time=\"1707368019\" user_id=\"35251:
I agree with you entirely on this. It’s trade offs and opportunity costs. And the rest is up to talent, luck and even timing. You may be very good but there was just 2 more even better born in your year.
Yes, totally agree with u, lucid.
That's why no matter what, children from rich, privileged families, are always at an advantage, over kids from poor families.
Why ?
Because parents loaded $ will start training their kid, from as young as kindergarten K1 / K2 five or six years old onwards, to train for tennis, golf, whatever other exiting or exotic games / Sports, that will land them a high chance to DSA into Top schools by the time their child reaches Upper primary level.
On the other hand, of course if a child after training so much but no talent in that Sports or lost interest along the way, then, that's a separate story.
I have a friend whose child was national gymnastics champion but was adamant NOT to DSA as he told the parents that he could not imagine training like that next 6 years ! So he went into the IP school on PSLE results, did join the gymnastic team but to contribute and not burdened that he was locked to it without being able to explore other things.
And I have seen a relative groom their two children in a competitive sport since kindergarten and go on to train with the “right” coaches affiliated to the top 2 boys IP schools. Both boys admitted through DSA and have graduated , they represented school team and went for the holiday and overseas trainings but never made it to the national team. So the sports excellence was not adequate for admissions to competitive courses at Uni. Anyhow, they are in local universities doing general type degrees. Seem happy enough though we all wonder if they had the opportunity to explore and round up their formative years with other interests etc. It was a narrow and straight path and we always will wonder what could have been otherwise. -
Dino\" post_id=\"2128678\" time=\"1707373520\" user_id=\"6726:
Cannot agree more
The idea and intention of DSA was never fair in the 1st place when admission is pegged at academic merit for the general masses. How do you assess fairness when a school cop is for example 6 and the hurdle for DSA is not more than 20 for the same school. Unless the whole masses can be convinced that 1 unit of whatever talent used to DSA has the same value as 1 unit of academic excellence. Since not everyone will be convinced, this fairness debate will forever exist. -
To take it further: if parents from impoverished country read this forum. They wil start complaining it’s not fair. “All you Singaporean parent get to choose how to get your kids into good schools; PSLE or DSA. Through sports, tuition, leaderships. All of us here in impovished countries can’t even get our kids into a school, even if we work hard, or we think we are smart. because we cannot afford it.”
-
bbbay\" post_id=\"2128683\" time=\"1707376960\" user_id=\"175278:
Well, it doesn’t stop here. Tietary levels- Oxbridge, Ivy and MIT etc. Why NUS and not SIT ?
To take it further: if parents from impoverished country read this forum. They wil start complaining it’s not fair. “All you Singaporean parent get to choose how to get your kids into good schools; PSLE or DSA. Through sports, tuition, leaderships. All of us here in impovished countries can’t even get our kids into a school, even if we work hard, or we think we are smart. because we cannot afford it.”
There is home advantage for all students and within that, debate is fierce on how to increase access to the less resourced - meaning they accept there is unequal access to opportunities. For international students, message is clear that you don’t come if you have not settled your funding sources.
For SG, it is still more equitable with Govt funding and scholarships but increasingly, less for the bright who don’t make the mark as brightest - going towards Korea, Japan etc in access aspects.
Those who whine just have not accepted this country has moved beyond developing third world young infant country where all start at same base line.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login