7 New IP schools
-
boson:
going by top 10% of cohort computation, will the COP for PSLE 2010 rise to at least 250 for these schools?So to clarify, is it that P6 pupils taking PSLE in 2012 can choose to apply for Sec 1 in the following IP schools?
1. CHS/SCGS/SNGS (A level in new JC)
2. DHS (6-year A level)
3. HCI/NYGS (A level in HCI-JC)
4. NJC (6-year A level)
5. RVHS (6-year A level)
6. TJC (6-year A level, extended downward from 4-year A-level)
7. RI/RGS (A level in RI-JC)
8. VS/Cedar (A level in VJC)
The IB schools are:
1. ACS/MGS (IB programme)
2. SJI (IB programme)
NUSH offers neither A-level nor IB.
That's a total of 17 schools, not 11+7 as previously mentioned by PM. Did I miss anything out? Unless someone forgot to minus one from the initial 11 (which will be VJC since they will take in students from 2 of the new IP schools). -
nani:
WTH :x The insensitive P ask the Sec students to hear out news, but it doesn't benefit them at all!!! Even for the current sec 1s :stupid: :stupid:
Which school is this? -
ycpang:
Current sec 1 & 2 may dsa , at end of their sec2, to third year of VJC, NJC, HCI, NUSH ....
So those currently in sec 1 and 2 will miss the boat :stupid: -
mrschan:
I'm thinking there might be more of a brain drain now from SCGS because the IP programme isn't that attractive and students will start thinking of leaving for even MGS or Cedar if they can't make RGS/NYGH. At least for the pioneer batch until the new JC proves itself.Dun get me wrong. I am not implying that sngs and cat high quality is not on par with scgs. I wouldjust prefer a partnership with a more estb institute. I noe how it is to be a poineering batch. Yes it is exciting and challenging but it can also be distracting and disorganised.
I guess SC's hands are tied. On one hand we want Ip status badly to stem brain drain yet on the other hand we have no affiliation to any jcs. So I guess we have to make do with this solution. Sigh... -
jtoh:
yes, that is very insightful. So now depends on how well SCGS is going to \"promote\" their IP program to their current students.
I'm thinking there might be more of a brain drain now from SCGS because the IP programme isn't that attractive and students will start thinking of leaving for even MGS or Cedar if they can't make RGS/NYGH. At least for the pioneer batch until the new JC proves itself.mrschan:
Dun get me wrong. I am not implying that sngs and cat high quality is not on par with scgs. I wouldjust prefer a partnership with a more estb institute. I noe how it is to be a poineering batch. Yes it is exciting and challenging but it can also be distracting and disorganised.
I guess SC's hands are tied. On one hand we want Ip status badly to stem brain drain yet on the other hand we have no affiliation to any jcs. So I guess we have to make do with this solution. Sigh... -
What is the quota of IP in-take at each new IP school. Did news say sometihing like 50 for VS & Cedar ? Getting into the school does not mean automatically go IP track. Just as in ACS(I) there is a cut-off. so it depend on the vacancy run in that school.
-
The principal of scgs is a proven leader having worked with the current principal of cat high during her successful stinct at xinmin. The board of scgs must have taken all factors into consideration. Should await details from moe regarding the new jc. The current principals of st nick and cat high are highly capable and these three leaders are able to draw on their experiences to come out with new initiatives for the students. No worries.
-
ApronMama:
What is the quota of IP in-take at each new IP school. Did news say sometihing like 50 for VS & Cedar ? Getting into the school does not mean automatically go IP track. Just as in ACS(I) there is a cut-off. so it depend on the vacancy run in that school.
the 50 for VS and Cedar is for 2011 Sec 1 batch (when the IP has not even started) becos they will start their IP in Sec 3 in 2013 -
this thread is so \"HOT\" now. :x
i wanted to post some query but don't know where to post. Pls pardon me for the Off-Topic.
In Dr Ng EH's speech http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2010/09/01/opening-remarks-national-day-rally-media-conference.php
he mentions that \"The pupil to teacher ratio will be improved as we increase the teaching force. From 20:1 in 2009 to 15:1 in 2015 for primary schools and 17:1 to 14:1 for secondary schools. \"
:? Is he talking about class size? Is he refering to GEP classes or IP-schs? My DS in neighbourhood pri sch never see ratio of less than 30:1. My DD in Sec 1 is ratio of 40:1. Did i misread / misunderstand that sentence?
Can anyone enlighten? Tks! -
ApronMama:
What is the quota of IP in-take at each new IP school. Did news say sometihing like 50 for VS & Cedar ? Getting into the school does not mean automatically go IP track. Just as in ACS(I) there is a cut-off. so it depend on the vacancy run in that school.
Cedar currently has about 1300 students, according to their website. Divide that by 4 to get the number per level and about half of that taking IP, I would say at least 160 for IP, around 160 non-IP when their IP programme kicks in fully? But then, it really depends on the quality of the results for those who apply there.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better đź’—
Register Login