GCE O level result release on 9 Jan

[phankao]

JonC:

There is a little different from MOE website PDF and http://www.catholichigh.moe.edu.sg/images/stories/attachments/308_2010%20GCE%20O-Level%20Results%20Summary_sch%20website.pdf.


Why put 9A1 1A2 from Cath High is Top Chinese Students and not the 1 of the 3 from Cath High with 10A1?

bc cath high wants to show more As. ;D The additional A1 in CHS' form is from a separate sitting - the CL exam they took the year before. All schools like to do this lah.

If you read MOE's website, it does say that it shows the results of students \"at one sitting\".

[JonC]

Oh, those who has HCL and took CL in Sec 3.

[tonyja]

I was failed by him, the boy only got 7-2-2 for o lvls, would be a miracle for him to get into RJ/ HCI

[anythingperson]

If i took higher chinese as a private canidate, would 2 points be deducted?

[Quintessential Mum]

JonC:

Oh, those who has HCL and took CL in Sec 3.

It is not accurate and is a misrepresentation of the results! MOE should take into account all the subjects taken at O levels by each student when determining the top students. For example, someone who took normal mt in Sec 3 scored an A1 and later took 9 other subjects in Sec 4 including HMT and scored 8A1s and 1A2 for HMT is not featured even though in total he had 9A1s and 1A2 versus a student who only took 9 subjects in Sec 4 and had 9A1s (no hmt). :shock:

[INNOVATE]

Quintessential Mum:

JonC:

Oh, those who has HCL and took CL in Sec 3.

It is not accurate and is a misrepresentation of the results! MOE should take into account all the subjects taken at O levels by each student when determining the top students. For example, someone who took normal mt in Sec 3 scored an A1 and later took 9 other subjects in Sec 4 including HMT and scored 8A1s and 1A2 for HMT is not featured even though in total he had 9A1s and 1A2 versus a student who only took 9 subjects in Sec 4 and had 9A1s (no hmt). :shock:

MOE ranks students strictly on subjects taken at one sitting. Anyway, all top scorers ie 9A1s without HMT have to appeal for admittance to RI/HCI even though their cases are a sure shoot-in.

[phankao]

INNOVATE:

Quintessential Mum:

[quote=\"JonC\"]Oh, those who has HCL and took CL in Sec 3.

It is not accurate and is a misrepresentation of the results! MOE should take into account all the subjects taken at O levels by each student when determining the top students. For example, someone who took normal mt in Sec 3 scored an A1 and later took 9 other subjects in Sec 4 including HMT and scored 8A1s and 1A2 for HMT is not featured even though in total he had 9A1s and 1A2 versus a student who only took 9 subjects in Sec 4 and had 9A1s (no hmt). :shock:

MOE ranks students strictly on subjects taken at one sitting. Anyway, all top scorers ie 9A1s without HMT have to appeal for admittance to RI/HCI even though their cases are a sure shoot-in.[/quote]Why have to appeal? Are you referring to those without HMT?

[INNOVATE]

phankao


Those without HMT have to appeal.

[YLH88]

INNOVATE:

phankao


Those without HMT have to appeal.

Are you referring to 6 - 2 (cca) = 4, so still need to appeal for HCI/RI ? so this means is very important for the kid to take HMT inorder to try to get the 2 bonus points ? at least the points must be 6 - 2 (cca) - 2 (hmt) = 2, otherwise you still not able to get in to HCI/RI even if you are one of the top scorer ?

[phankao]

YLH88:

INNOVATE:

phankao


Those without HMT have to appeal.

Are you referring to 6 - 2 (cca) = 4, so still need to appeal for HCI/RI ? so this means is very important for the kid to take HMT inorder to try to get the 2 bonus points ? at least the points must be 6 - 2 (cca) - 2 (hmt) = 2, otherwise you still not able to get in to HCI/RI even if you are one of the top scorer ?

But sure will get in, ah? There are other JCs that they can get in with 4points.