The BIG Breakdown or Meltdown
-
verykiasu2010:
\"privatisation\" without competition in the market is not privatisation
profit maximisiation without keeping to maintenance standards is management failure
just like an airline / airplane, compromise in safety checks and maintenance will end up paying a high cost one day, sooner or later
obviously the SMRT's \"daily check\" on the track / rail is simply going through the motion without thinking, looking at the thing with eyes shut. As Minister $$ said, such items' wear and tear don't happen over night. And as reported, there was no check on the slab in the last 10 years !!!! If they could discover in one night so much damages, how come they did not discover them in the daily check every night for the past how many years/months?
Those claws and power line cover damages don't happen over night
Since it was possible to go into their depot to deface the train, anything is possible
It is absolute management failure
Totally agree!!
Where is the accountability ??
Was it an act of nature beyond the control of SMRT?
Was it an terroist act ?
No it is a simple case of no proper maintenance, proper replacement plan,
Something that is scary to think.
The problem is that things should have been checked long before it came to this point. A maintenance failure shows a chronic problem It is a big time negligence on someone's part and its time some one took responsibility.
\"Customer pain is necessary\"
Why should the I the customer bear the pain when SMRT is the one at fault? I have been paying for my ticket and my taxes on time.
\" The circle line works caused lesser maintenance\"
So the Circle line was built at the cost of the NS - EW line? -
Way2GO:
I don't anyhow say got no competition.verykiasu2010:
\"privatisation\" without competition in the market is not privatisation
Got mah. who say don't hv. It's a duopoly with another GLC company operating d newer lines leh.
Didn't notice after Comfort hike taxi fares, SMRT n TIBS follow suit?
Of course hv competition lah. Don't anyhow say got no competition!
I say it properly : There is no competition because there is no alternative services for the same route - be it bus or train. It is utterly wicked to remove the bus routes that run on similar routing to the MRT line, forcing MRT ridership to increase - and of course this increased in ridership of the train is not due to the management capability of SMRT (Saw Must Resign Today) -
as regional president of DFS, she did not need to know what is maintenance work and maintenance budget
the word "maintenance budget" probably did not exist in her vocab till yesterday
but she ought to know this metro running under Orchard Road is not the same as the Metro used to be on Orchard Road
she thought she was running another Metro -
No, the failure of checks is pretty inexcusable.
But would a government-run entity do any better?
As I see on this forum, there is plenty of dissatisfaction with the g’ment oredi, so why does one think they would do a better job by taking over the public transport?
How about education? G’ment run yes? How many of you are satisfied?
I think this notion that all problems will be solved by turning things public is fool’s gold. -
3Boys:
agreedNo, the failure of checks is pretty inexcusable.
But would a government-run entity do any better?
As I see on this forum, there is plenty of dissatisfaction with the g'ment oredi, so why does one think they would do a better job by taking over the public transport?
How about education? G'ment run yes? How many of you are satisfied?
I think this notion that all problems will be solved by turning things public is fool's gold.
but before MRT was corporatised-and-then-listed it was running well. presumably as a stat board, on operating-cost recovery basis, and the infrastructure cost was borne by tax payers; and there was quite a number of reports highlighting the rigorous maintenance work carried out at night. but since profit is a kpi, it ruined the whole thing but it need not be and should not have been this way
Telecoms, PUB, HDB, PWD, JTC, all were running well under the the various stat boards by the very efficient civil servants until they are corporatised and prices to consumers start to increase relentlessly without increase in efficiency -
verykiasu2010:
3boys, for all intents n purposes, d gahmen maintains a strong hand in running of SMRT n d various GLCs dat VK2010 mentioned.
agreed3Boys:
No, the failure of checks is pretty inexcusable.
But would a government-run entity do any better?
As I see on this forum, there is plenty of dissatisfaction with the g'ment oredi, so why does one think they would do a better job by taking over the public transport?
How about education? G'ment run yes? How many of you are satisfied?
I think this notion that all problems will be solved by turning things public is fool's gold.
but before MRT was corporatised-and-then-listed it was running well. presumably as a stat board, on operating-cost recovery basis, and the infrastructure cost was borne by tax payers; and there was quite a number of reports highlighting the rigorous maintenance work carried out at night. but since profit is a kpi, it ruined the whole thing but it need not be and should not have been this way
Telecoms, PUB, HDB, PWD, JTC, all were running well under the the various stat boards by the very efficient civil servants until they are corporatised and prices to consumers start to increase relentlessly without increase in efficiency
He makes a valid point. Things haven't been d same since d pressure is on d GLCs to keep generating more profits. -
Just to shed some light on privatisation. I do not think all our infra-structures in SG privatised for the sake of competing here. We are far too small, it would be child’s play. Privatisation allows us to work across borders. If we continue to bash ourselves we have no value to offer to others and shoot ourselves on competitive grounds. Do we think we can survive just based on our own local markets alone? We need to generate jobs for our people overseas as well. Let’s think harder instead of bashing ourselves everyday. Don’t forget at the end of the day our best resources is our brains.
Do you know that Taiwan model their MRT system after ours? Taiwanese can tell me this, can you? I have enjoyed their MRT system because they have eradicated a couple of things we did not do well when we first built ours and we shared with them. I have lived in a few places before and I understand the value we represent. While I think it is great that we are always asking for ourselves to improve, we could do it in a more reasonable fashion towards ourselves. Yes indeed we have alot to improve upon but suggestions would be good and written to the right authority.
FYI, I am travelling by MRT and bus daily in another foreign land now. For the record, they had experienced glitches for the MRT when I was here and they just made announcements about it and apologised for it happening and life moved on. No one was particularly bothered by it when I watched the reaction of the commuters and I gathered it probably happened enough times to warrant that as a common affair.
It is no doubt our maintenance programme for our MRT has to be reviewed, give them time to sort this out and I am sure privatisation also means that they have better get their act together better and faster because everyone is watching, even from the outside. Of course the idea was not to profit internally but that is a temptation the human nature will succumb to. So we need the right people for the major roles. -
verykiasu2010:
dat post on 'got competition' was pure sarcasm
I don't anyhow say got no competition.
I say it properly : There is no competition because there is no alternative services for the same route - be it bus or train. It is utterly wicked to remove the bus routes that run on similar routing to the MRT line, forcing MRT ridership to increase - and of course this increased in ridership of the train is not due to the management capability of SMRT (Saw Must Resign Today)
What u said about d removal of bus routes could well explain commuters' disgust
when SPH said SMRT provided free bridging bus services when d trains broke down.
Whilst what she said is factually correct at face value,
it is also expected service as dis shd be part of a service recovery procedure n
not done as a favour to stranded commuters when parallel bus services hv oredi been removed. -
3Boys:
:snuggles: Hmmmmm? I don't believe that I have taken a stand on this issue yet? I hadn't quite made up my mind until this incident.
Don't worry my dear, I never take these things personallyChenonceau:
I was their consultant for over a year and I saw how things changed AFTER privatisation. Maintenance budget shrank. Training budget shrank. Bed bugs began to appear in buses, and repairs were left so late that newspapers highlighted them. And now, bus drivers lose their way!! Meanwhile, CEOs report PROFITS and take home FAT paychecks eh?
Maybe SBS Transit was not PROFIT-efficient, but it sure was efficient in how it moved Singaporeans from home to work, and it sure did help build our reputation as an efficient country.
3boys, I have regard for you and it pains me that we now disagree. I hope you don't mind. It's just an opinion. We can agree to disagree. and you are at liberty to blast me all you wish, and I still have the highest regard for your thoughtful writing.
Although I must say it seems that it is your position have shifted rather than mine on this issue (which is now the stodgy and very unfashionable line of profit-motive for sustainability of services).
I understand your point, and it is well taken. -
Sun_2010:
There will be accountability as political cost will be too great to ignore.
Totally agree!!
Where is the accountability ??
Was it an act of nature beyond the control of SMRT?
Was it an terroist act ?
No it is a simple case of no proper maintenance, proper replacement plan,
Something that is scary to think.
The problem is that things should have been checked long before it came to this point. A maintenance failure shows a chronic problem It is a big time negligence on someone's part and its time some one took responsibility.
\"Customer pain is necessary\"
Why should the I the customer bear the pain when SMRT is the one at fault? I have been paying for my ticket and my taxes on time.
\" The circle line works caused lesser maintenance\"
So the Circle line was built at the cost of the NS - EW line?
SPH is not high up enuf to appoint her own subordinate to COI committee, aka WKS/mas saga. :evil:
Someone will take d fall.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login