Net rumour that Yaw Shin Leong having extra-maritial affair
-
Way2GO:
Are u than taking a nonchalant stand on this? The way I see it is tt, as an MP, confronted with an allegation of adultery, it's important for him or her to deny rigorously or admit & apologize, than accept the consequences, whatever it may be...Vote PAP,
I don't quite get u when u asks for 'Transparency and Accountability'?
I believe when LTK said dat, he was referring to govt policies n relevant info/data dat affects d ppl.
If it's a party internal processes u r asking, no party is going to reveal those going-ons.
In short, it's important, as leaders to be transparent & accountable where it counts, whether it be political or moral issues; if u believe that u can 'steal' someone else's spouse & get away with it, then there's really nothing to stop u from 'stealing' from the people...right.. Think abt it.... -
justcoping:
ur points r valid n apply appropriately to private citizens.Wow! This discussion has spanned so many pages. Decided finally to speak up: my stand is that engaging in EMA is wrong and should not be condoned. It tells of the integrity of a person -- one who can retract his or her words, annul promises made...
A marriage vow is a contractual agreement between 2. If one party defaults due to EMA, it's unacceptable and what's worse in this case, there is no acknowledgement of fault and no apologies rendered --> meaning no sense of remorse on the guilty party.
Many may try to speak up and say that the rumours are untrue and not proven but I feel that the very fact that the person involved has not dispelled it, points to the reality of what has happened.
It does not matter which political party the person comes from or even if that person is involved in politics or not... my viewpoint and stand remains.
Politics is a different animal.
I m not condoning YSL's sexual trysts, esp impregnating a married woman, if true.
However, I opined dat private matters r for them to resolve n reconcile privately.
How is a public airing of their sexual trysts going to help d families involved?
Its a different matter when conflict of interest arises fr these affairs.
u can be sure dat CPIB will step in n then it becomes a matter of public interest. -
Vote PAP:
How many ppl Yaw So Lascivious sleep with is not my business.
Are u than taking a nonchalant stand on this? The way I see it is tt, as an MP, confronted with an allegation of adultery, it's important for him or her to deny rigorously or admit & apologize, than accept the consequences, whatever it may be...
In short, it's important, as leaders to be transparent & accountable where it counts, whether it be political or moral issues; if u believe that u can 'steal' someone else's spouse & get away with it, then there's really nothing to stop u from 'stealing' from the people...right.. Think abt it....
I wld be concerned if he exhibits a pattern of behaviour dat will affect his role/responsibilities as a functioning MP or his affairs result in actual or potential conflict of interest.
r u asking him to be transparent to u about his private affairs,
n be accountable to d public for wat's allegedly done dat is not illegal?
u said u will also ask for a full disclosure if it happens to a PAP MP.
I give u another one to chew on:
Dis MP, since retired as Minister, a Christian, had an affair with his subordinate fr one of d big supermarket chain. She even got promoted. I wld see dat as a possible conflict of interest. Did u hear a public airing of dis affair? There wasn't. Dat's politics. -
Mdm Koh:
Curious why u say dis.
Yaw Shin Leong is unlikely to run in the next election, so he won't have the chance to cheat anyone's money. Don't worry so much!
u hear some rustlings in d wind?
If latest 'revelations' from msm tabloids r to be believed,
it shows a pattern of behaviour dat is worrisome which
IMO, wld start to affect his proper functioning as an MP.
In dat case, WP has to act. -
Vote PAP:
Are u than taking a nonchalant stand on this? The way I see it is tt, as an MP, confronted with an allegation of adultery, it's important for him or her to deny rigorously or admit & apologize, than accept the consequences, whatever it may be...Way2GO:
Vote PAP,
I don't quite get u when u asks for 'Transparency and Accountability'?
I believe when LTK said dat, he was referring to govt policies n relevant info/data dat affects d ppl.
If it's a party internal processes u r asking, no party is going to reveal those going-ons.
In short, it's important, as leaders to be transparent & accountable where it counts, whether it be political or moral issues; if u believe that u can 'steal' someone else's spouse & get away with it, then there's really nothing to stop u from 'stealing' from the people...right.. Think abt it....
:celebrate: And to prove I'm not in \"cahoots\" with VOTE PAP , I actually voted the oppostion in May.
-
Lilac66:
Are u than taking a nonchalant stand on this? The way I see it is tt, as an MP, confronted with an allegation of adultery, it's important for him or her to deny rigorously or admit & apologize, than accept the consequences, whatever it may be...Vote PAP:
[quote=\"Way2GO\"]Vote PAP,
I don't quite get u when u asks for 'Transparency and Accountability'?
I believe when LTK said dat, he was referring to govt policies n relevant info/data dat affects d ppl.
If it's a party internal processes u r asking, no party is going to reveal those going-ons.
In short, it's important, as leaders to be transparent & accountable where it counts, whether it be political or moral issues; if u believe that u can 'steal' someone else's spouse & get away with it, then there's really nothing to stop u from 'stealing' from the people...right.. Think abt it....
:celebrate: And to prove I'm not in \"cahoots\" with VOTE PAP , I actually voted the oppostion in May.[/quote]That's why we have elections; so tt u may vote for the candidate that u feel will best represent u, with all the necessary traits to be a good, effective, honest, morally upright leader. This may sound idealistic, but it's what we expect of our leaders, after all they are also law-makers. So, how can a leader or law-maker also have moral conflicts, blurring what's right & what's wrong...?
-
Way2GO:
Since u have rumor(s) on some unnamed individual, why not start a forum on this and u may find me there..?
How many ppl Yaw So Lascivious sleep with is not my business.Vote PAP:
Are u than taking a nonchalant stand on this? The way I see it is tt, as an MP, confronted with an allegation of adultery, it's important for him or her to deny rigorously or admit & apologize, than accept the consequences, whatever it may be...
In short, it's important, as leaders to be transparent & accountable where it counts, whether it be political or moral issues; if u believe that u can 'steal' someone else's spouse & get away with it, then there's really nothing to stop u from 'stealing' from the people...right.. Think abt it....
I wld be concerned if he exhibits a pattern of behaviour dat will affect his role/responsibilities as a functioning MP or his affairs result in actual or potential conflict of interest.
r u asking him to be transparent to u about his private affairs,
n be accountable to d public for wat's allegedly done dat is not illegal?
u said u will also ask for a full disclosure if it happens to a PAP MP.
I give u another one to chew on:
Dis MP, since retired as Minister, a Christian, had an affair with his subordinate fr one of d big supermarket chain. She even got promoted. I wld see dat as a possible conflict of interest. Did u hear a public airing of dis affair? There wasn't. Dat's politics. -
HVR:
Though YSL and WP are still saying 'no comment', I think we have enough factual information to read between the lines regarding the alleged EMA. I am not comfortable and I cannot trust politicians who are morally unsound, never mind he/she is criminally clean. They are in a position to shape policies and it has significant bearing on how our country will progress. We expect them to be of higher standard and rightly so. ANY politician who involved in EMA should just step down. They can have EMA for all they want in their private life. They are answerable to their conscience, their family but nothing to do with constituents. Once they enter politic, they have to be able to stand on moral high ground. No such thing as clear demarcation of public life and private life. It's not possible. I have a feeling we are so forgiving toward EMA because a lot of us are guilty of it. It's very sad.
Well said. I share same sentiments... -
Aiyah, why bother about each forumer’s comments? Don’t care lah. Login and write what you want to say and logout. Yahoo and Stomp forumers are fiercer compare to this forum.
-
Way2GO:
If this EMA happened in a private setting involving only private citizens, then we wld not even here of it. We shd not be naive, this involves an elected leader. If I vote in someone to parliament, I'd like to know that, apart from doing a good job, he/she must be honest & trustworthy too. These are just basic criterias of what is required. U mentioned conflict of interest or lack thereof. If your married friend sleeps with your spouse, is that a welcomed event or a conflict of interest?? Something for us all to think about... Is there a conflict of interest here, or just fiction of conflict? No conflict because it's not your spouse tt he is having EMA with? When will u draw the line?
ur points r valid n apply appropriately to private citizens.justcoping:
Wow! This discussion has spanned so many pages. Decided finally to speak up: my stand is that engaging in EMA is wrong and should not be condoned. It tells of the integrity of a person -- one who can retract his or her words, annul promises made...
A marriage vow is a contractual agreement between 2. If one party defaults due to EMA, it's unacceptable and what's worse in this case, there is no acknowledgement of fault and no apologies rendered --> meaning no sense of remorse on the guilty party.
Many may try to speak up and say that the rumours are untrue and not proven but I feel that the very fact that the person involved has not dispelled it, points to the reality of what has happened.
It does not matter which political party the person comes from or even if that person is involved in politics or not... my viewpoint and stand remains.
Politics is a different animal.
I m not condoning YSL's sexual trysts, esp impregnating a married woman, if true.
However, I opined dat private matters r for them to resolve n reconcile privately.
How is a public airing of their sexual trysts going to help d families involved?
Its a different matter when conflict of interest arises fr these affairs.
u can be sure dat CPIB will step in n then it becomes a matter of public interest.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
