Principal of top school under investigation for hiring prost

[corneyAmber]

schweppes:

ksi:

[quote=\"phtthp\"]so is he a pimp or a client ?


if just client - no charge
but if pimp of an illegal setup - face charges

to me i think he's only a client.

Likely no charge for him but his reputation is marred already....and career limited...

:idea: :idea: maybe now he can be a pimp :siam: [/quote]OMG!!! new found career.... :nailbite:

[buds]

schweppes:

As this is a vice case, a school principal is more newsworthy compared to the other \"clients\", so more to sensationalize and feed on public anger/ reactions.

Agree. Likewise for the case of the sexual relationship the married male teacher with two kids had with his student for so many years. Sensational also right?

Plus MOE is already under fire with soo many parents complaining endlessly about teachers.. teaching resources.. teaching skills.. not completing curriculum.. etc.. what's another... :roll:

Feeding on public anger is aptly it, schweppes.

[corneyAmber]

schweppes:

Daddy

Former P easier to dig... He's really suay...

As this is a vice case, a school principal is more newsworthy compared to the other \"clients\", so more to sensationalize and feed on public anger/ reactions.

Yeah you are right schweppes! The news people decide who is suay....

[buds]

schweppes:

Yup... all the ins and outs of the trade!

Besides, he WILL be out of a job for awhile.
Doubt he'll get hired by anyone anywhere now.
Not limited to just education sector anymore..

[corneyAmber]

buds:

schweppes:

As this is a vice case, a school principal is more newsworthy compared to the other \"clients\", so more to sensationalize and feed on public anger/ reactions.

Agree. Likewise for the case of the sexual relationship the married male teacher with two kids had with his student for so many years. Sensational also right?

Plus MOE is already under fire with soo many parents complaining endlessly about teachers.. teaching resources.. teaching skills.. not completing curriculum.. etc.. what's another... :roll:

Feeding on public anger is aptly it, schweppes.

This case highlighted is not about sensational, this case serves as a warning for parents to take note and be warned that our children have to know what are the potential threats they have and should they face any issues in school in that area, they should attempt to speak to the parents.

[Way2GO]

Zhuge:

Way2GO:

Top 2 men in Home Affairs both ex SJI boys.

New brooms cleaning hse?
d probe beginning with d 2 HODs r widening n netting more.
Can only be good for d Civil Service to clean it up.

wrong info...not sji..

r we talking of same ppl in MHA?
TCH n TTH?
I m very certain both ex SJI.

[corneyAmber]

buds:

ksi:

So far the discussion on EMA generally is not unhealthy, that is fine as long as we do not keep pushing the hypotheses related to EMA directly onto specific individuals especially when we know them not personally.

EMA & hiring prostitutes are entirely two different things.

Besides a forum is a platform for discussion.

Don't see the relevance of you quoting me here. :? I am talking about the EMA discussion which insider and lilac66 is having and both are right in their own views as the EMA discussion is fairly general about what is generally not acceptable and insider is also sharing good insights about why some men did what they did. It does not make it more right as temptation still takes over but everyone has his unique reasons.

[buds]

Lilac66:

Sorry, but by saying this, you are inadvertently giving alot of men the excuse of straying. Many men involved in affairs always say they're torn because they also love the mistress.

Mistress and prostitutes aside..

What i think insider was trying to convey was...

If spouses of the strayers were to give their marriage another shot..
(They say everybody deserves a second chance, no?) they have got to
look beyond the act (of sex addiction.. sexual fantasies.. regularly visiting
hookers.. extra marital affairs.. etc) to be able to move on. Apart from the sick
habits these men may have, they could also jolly well be fantastic husbands to
their wives and excellent fathers to their children. I know of a few people who
are trapped in such situations and still stand by their men. An extremely diff
decision to make in their stance but they've moved on & some lived happier
than before... like the adversities they faced only made their bond stronger.

[buds]

ksi:

This case highlighted is not about sensational, this case serves as a warning for parents to take note and be warned that our children have to know what are the potential threats they have and should they face any issues in school in that area, they should attempt to speak to the parents.

Huh? :scratchhead:

What talking you? Sorry catch no ball as usual.

All these are newsworthy AND sensational. All these ARE warnings for everyone and not just parents. Potential threats can come from schools, offices, clinics (i got sexually harassed by a doctor!) and many other places. It's not limited to schools lar. :slapshead:

Basically morality cannot be measured.. be checked by a scale or whatsoever.. ppl can look and behave as decent as decent as can be and yet have closet hobbies no one knows about..

Until of course kena caught lar.

Besides the girl in the sexual relationship case is no simple girl either. But thats another different story altogether. :roll:

[vicki]

Hi insider,


I’m just wondering aloud. If your that friend had found out and told you that his wife was actually sleeping around also ‘because the husband cannot do and perform out the sexual fantacies that she wants’ - would he and you (assuming he told you) be ok with it as well? Since she is a good wife etc etc etc…

Or is it only a one-way ticket - ie, man ‘can’ sleep around but woman ‘cannot’.