PM Lee sends lawyer's letter to editors of TR Emeritus

[3Boys]

Nebbermind:

Way2GO:

But Dhana is not going to be between them when they r in bed, right arnot?.

the thought is like....so nauseating!!!

OMG!! :rotflmao: :rotflmao:

[Way2GO]

Nebbermind:

Way2GO:

[quote=\"Nebbermind\"]Didn't follow the whole episode....why was the lawyer acting for the PM when the slander was on HC? She is in a high enough position to act for herself, ya?

Davinder Singh, Drew & Napier.
HC is not a lawyer by training.

No, why lawyer not acting for her....she is...what u call that....actual aggrieved party, ya?[/quote]Oh solli, I thot u mispelled why for who.
He is also an aggrieved party by association.
One of d consideration for d amount of damages to be awarded
in a defamation suit is how big is d plaintiff's reputation n
how much damage is caused to dat reputation.
On both counts, PM is greater.
Dat's my reading.

[Way2GO]

Nebbermind:

Way2GO:

But Dhana is not going to be between them when they r in bed, right arnot?.

the thought is like....so nauseating!!!

Just get d msg
don't visualize it! :rotflmao:

[buds]

:rotflmao:

[limlim]

BlueBells:

Let the truth prevails then ....


But I really pity the people related to the high profile / high ranking, aka A-listers. If these people are truly capable high flyers, there will always be a faction who will never give them due credit, except to think they reach where they are because they are related to the A-listers.

And the results? how many billions was that ar....? lost count..

capable.. indeed..

[HVR]

Way2GO:

Oh solli, I thot u mispelled why for who.
He is also an aggrieved party by association.
One of d consideration for d amount of damages to be awarded
in a defamation suit is how big is d plaintiff's reputation n
how much damage is caused to dat reputation.
On both counts, PM is greater.
Dat's my reading.

If I may add, PM has not asked for damages in this case. If I may further add, the damages awarded to all govt leaders for all previous suits were all donated to charities.

[limlim]

raysusan:

[quote]her appointment has nothing to do with her family connection

who agree here?[/quote]\"Believe\" may be a better word.... :evil:

[limlim]

3Boys:

I thought we were talking about transparency a few threads ago? Now its okay for people to make wild allegations and the people being maligned should just shut up?

They can clarify or address the issue to the public..

Not necessarily armed with a threat to sue to the individual..

[Way2GO]

HVR:

If I may add, PM has not asked for damages in this case. If I may further add, the damages awarded to all govt leaders for all previous suits were all donated to charities.

First, wat r u trying to say in ur second point?
On ur first point, dat's true.
Its a shot across d bows.
Ditto with d honourable Minister.
d fear dat u cld be sued off ur pants
is enuff to shut up many.

[HVR]

Way2GO:

HVR:

If I may add, PM has not asked for damages in this case. If I may further add, the damages awarded to all govt leaders for all previous suits were all donated to charities.

First, wat r u trying to say in ur second point?
On ur first point, dat's true.
Its a shot across d bows.
Ditto with d honourable Minister.
d fear dat u cld be sued off ur pants
is enuff to shut up many.

That they sued not to enrich themselves but to clear their names. You shouldn't be fearful if you can back up what you said. Unless you are saying something you know you can't substantiate with facts.