MOE Relooking P1 registration - Too much priority to alumni
-
Wah!! I sure hope they dont remove the siblings phase!! I have 3 kids! N I cannot imagine the logistic nightmare n the escalating cost I would have to go through if this scheme is removed n my boys suay suay don’t get into the same school!!
Imagine!! New uniforms!! New textbooks (if different authors are used)!! Mad morning rush!!
Eeks!!! ;(
Pls keep this phase!!! -
Mod’s Note
Please focus the discussion, debate, etc on the topic and comments, but not at each other. Do not get personal.
There will alway be differences in opinion. Please accept that and agree to disagree. -
vicki:
Exactly! Of all the phases since time immemorial, this is probably the only phase that did not chang much.Wah!! I sure hope they dont remove the siblings phase!! I have 3 kids! N I cannot imagine the logistic nightmare n the escalating cost I would have to go through if this scheme is removed n my boys suay suay don't get into the same school!!
Imagine!! New uniforms!! New textbooks (if different authors are used)!! Mad morning rush!!
Eeks!!! ;(
Pls keep this phase!!!
=>phttph, can you see how ridiculous your suggestion is? To compensate for the 'lose' of vacancy from your phase 2A, you actually thought of poaching it from phase 1 by capping it. I bet if you have a child waiting to enter school via phase 1, you wouldn't suggest capping it...gosh, I'm still very upset how can you be so selfish as to think of such a stupid idea! -
vicki:
I feel phase 1 is the fairest of all the phases. Totally agree that it's going to be a logistical nightmare for most parents if it's really removed.Wah!! I sure hope they dont remove the siblings phase!! I have 3 kids! N I cannot imagine the logistic nightmare n the escalating cost I would have to go through if this scheme is removed n my boys suay suay don't get into the same school!!
Imagine!! New uniforms!! New textbooks (if different authors are used)!! Mad morning rush!!
Eeks!!! ;(
Pls keep this phase!!!
This phase must stay!!
Otherwise, new parents to be should perhaps consider just having 1 child then...?! -
Cool it IDad. :imcool: Remember what Mod said okay. No personal attack okay.....we all agreed to disagreed. :heresmyfish:
-
IDad:
Exactly! Of all the phases since time immemorial, this is probably the only phase that did not chang much.vicki:
Wah!! I sure hope they dont remove the siblings phase!! I have 3 kids! N I cannot imagine the logistic nightmare n the escalating cost I would have to go through if this scheme is removed n my boys suay suay don't get into the same school!!
Imagine!! New uniforms!! New textbooks (if different authors are used)!! Mad morning rush!!
Eeks!!! ;(
Pls keep this phase!!!
=>phttph, can you see how ridiculous your suggestion is? To compensate for the 'lose' of vacancy from your phase 2A, you actually thought of poaching it from phase 1 by capping it. I bet if you have a child waiting to enter school via phase 1, you wouldn't suggest capping it...gosh, I'm still very upset how can you be so selfish as to think of such a stupid idea!
Phttph is one of the most helpful parents on this forum.
She is just throwing out ideas which is what we are doing too. Her idea may not be great but to call her the 2 'S' is unnecessary.Some suggestions thrown out in this thread may be fair to some but to others no it ain't.
So do listen to the mod's suggestion. -
IDad is it existing member in this thread that dun dare to review true identify? Created new acct just to attack Phttph?!
-
MOE reviewing is to finalise by coming 2012 Registration?
-
Phttph is a very active and hardworking forummer who painstakingly collates the PSLE quality passes for a lot of schools on her own accord. I really salute her efforts for that. You may disagree with her in a cordial way but no need to call her ‘sxxxxx’…
-
phtthp:
Parents inside the 2A group already very angry and pissed off - esp. 2A alumni from the 9 GEP schools ! The hornet's beehive nest for 2A is been disturbed. Is like someone shoot a lighted up burning fire arrow with kerosene into the beehive nest. All the bees swarm out in danger, lost their home.
Ya, agree! All the old girls and old boys up in arms already!
To give another illustration, getting rid of the alumni priority is like killing the goose which lay the golden egg for those hot schools. Those calling for the removal actually eyeing the seats and for the \"connections\". No more \"connections\" to rub shoulders with \"powerful alumni\" whats the whole point of this discussion anyway?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login