Opinions on Gifted Education Programme (GEP)

[KSP]

mother3:

What is there to be jealous! GEP is very great meh ? If you

Want your kid go GEP ... Go la ....
Not necessary GEPpers got the best results in psle , A level ....
Who gain most ? The child ? The parents ? The tuition/ enrichment centre .
At age of 10..,, not plAying but assignments and tests .....
No wonder more and more children are seeking medical attention in
IMH ....
I believed that even MOE strap gEP ... It will some form of
Streaming .... And what you call elite ....
Btw I know of many parents and myself do not wish to enrol my
My son to enrol into gep though qualified ... To give them a healthy less stressful
Learning environment . And btw it is the parents who help / do the child projects and assignments .

i agreed to your last statement

[KSP]

verykiasu2010:

[quote]Singapore need to scrap Gifted Education Programme - NCMP


by NCMP Yee Jenn Jong


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I like MOE to consider scrapping centralised primary school GEP too.

..........

Schools can be supported by the GE Branch with learning resources distributed to them for use, or schools may prepare their own content. Selected teachers in all schools can be trained on how to guide students with stronger learning abilities.

We can spread accelerated learning across many schools. Parents not need transfer their child out to a gifted school at 9 years old. MOE wants to convince parents that every school is a good school. Separating gifted students into special schools undermines this message.

this guy is self contradicting

proposing to scrap GEP and want to use GE Branch to distribute learning resources .....

what is he trying to say ?[/quote]maybe he wants to scrap GEP and then let all students expose to GE learning resources... i'm worried more students will visit IMH if this really happpens.....

[jtoh]

KSP:

mother3:

color=#BF0000]And btw it is the parents who help / do the child projects and assignments[/color] .

i agreed to your last statement

Let's not generalize here, shall we? Not all parents help their children with their projects and assignments. There are some, probably the more kiasu parents. And possibly those who feel their kids need help in GEP.

I for one never helped my kid with her GEP homework, projects and assignments. I let her tackle everything on her own and she came out none the worse for it. I figured if she was going to reap the benefits of the programme it was best that she experience everything herself. She may not have topped PSLE nor GEP but she is doing rather well in secondary school now, having embraced the learning journey and its long term benefits.

[KSP]

jtoh:

KSP:

[quote=\"mother3\"]color=#BF0000]And btw it is the parents who help / do the child projects and assignments[/color] .

i agreed to your last statement

Let's not generalize here, shall we? Not all parents help their children with their projects and assignments. There are some, probably the more kiasu parents. And possibly those who feel their kids need help in GEP.

I for one never helped my kid with her GEP homework, projects and assignments. I let her tackle everything on her own and she came out none the worse for it. I figured if she was going to reap the benefits of the programme it was best that she experience everything herself. She may not have topped PSLE nor GEP but she is doing rather well in secondary school now, having embraced the learning journey and its long term benefits.[/quote]Maybe the teachers will know best with all the color laser printed and laminated work from a 10-12 yo kid.

[jtoh]

KSP:

Maybe the teachers will know best with all the color laser printed and laminated work from a 10-12 yo kid.

Content is far more important than colour laser prints and lamination which form the presentation. Anyway why wouldn't a 10-12 year old be capable of printing and laminating their own work? Just because a child hands up a well-produced project doesn't mean he didn't do it on his own.

[KSP]

jtoh:

KSP:

Maybe the teachers will know best with all the color laser printed and laminated work from a 10-12 yo kid.

Content is far more important than colour laser prints and lamination which form the presentation. Anyway why wouldn't a 10-12 year old be capable of printing and laminating their own work? Just because a child hands up a well-produced project doesn't mean he didn't do it on his own.

i think there is no end to this.......

[naggo-nitemare]

jtoh:

Just because a child hands up a well-produced project doesn't mean he didn't do it on his own.

Jtoh, I totally agree with u. Some kids are perfectionists or simply savvy in project presentation. I hv come across a couple of them. These days, kids are not to be underestimated.

[jtoh]

KSP:

jtoh:

[quote=\"KSP\"]
Maybe the teachers will know best with all the color laser printed and laminated work from a 10-12 yo kid.

Content is far more important than colour laser prints and lamination which form the presentation. Anyway why wouldn't a 10-12 year old be capable of printing and laminating their own work? Just because a child hands up a well-produced project doesn't mean he didn't do it on his own.

i think there is no end to this.......[/quote]I don't understand. No end to what? I'm just saying don't generalize that all parents help their kids with their projects and assignments. And don't underestimate the ability of some kids.

[jtoh]

naggo-nitemare:

jtoh:

Just because a child hands up a well-produced project doesn't mean he didn't do it on his own.

Jtoh, I totally agree with u. Some kids are perfectionists or simply savvy in project presentation. I hv come across a couple of them. These days, kids are not to be underestimated.

Yes, the creativity and artistic ability of some kids are amazing, far beyond their years. It would be a sad day if these kids have to dumb down their projects just so some adults will believe it's the work of a child.

[Edureach]

I feel that the selection process can further be improved by introducing a final interview for the top 400-500 pupils. This is to ensure that the no of trained pupils are minimised and the actual figure may be down to 200/250.


The above fig is a more realistic reflection of the brightest kids within the cohort than the current fig(the no of talented students admitted to arts sch is also around 200 each yr). High ability kids who had undergone training hve no business in this programme and keeping them out is for their longterm interest.

No use doing home work for the gifted ones as it posses the risk of encouraging plaigarism. Anw is unsubstainable!