MOE Relooking P1 registration - Too much priority to alumni

[vicki]

Baby_May_09:

My above post is just explaining the difference between full school and non-full school from what I know. My stand on the topic is that I can see that alumni connection is important like what many had said, but I also feel that there should be a cap ie. 1/3 of the remaining places after phase 1?

Agree too.

[dorisp]

vicki:

Yup - you are on the right side of fence with the greener grass...

I am too - if current procedures remain.

So, why am i fighting for the 'under priviledged' for what i feel is the 'common good'?

:? I must be :siao:

Don't worry. You are not alone.

[LOLMum]

as much as a school would like to take in all applicants, it is impossible.


schools (be it popular or neighbourhood) have to reduce the intake because it is switching to one session.

from what i know, acsp is unable to add places because there is really no more space in the school to squeeze in another class.

[vicki]

vratenza:

the ABSOLUTE PRIORITY at this point in time are the P1. there is no Absolute priority for P2 at this stage...you can argue till the cows come home on the CAP vs no CAP issue, that's not my fight.

And the list I proposed are just reasons why some parents prefer to choose their alumni for their children. Please read the post carefully and refrain from altering my intentions.

Please do not start stirring the hornet's nest on taxpayer money argument. Some one will come along and ask you which tax bracket are you paying this year.....do you really want to go there?

I apologise if i misread you.

But i wonder - if REALLY there is a cap, would the 'primary' school student then be 'fighting' with the 'secondary' school students? An interesting thought.

My mention of tax was to imply that we all 'pay' to the govt (irregardless of tax brackets) - so i dont see why 'too much' benefit should be given to anyone group based on personal reasons...

[vratenza]

vicki:

Yup - you are on the right side of fence with the greener grass...

I am too - if current procedures remain.

So, why am i fighting for the 'under priviledged' for what i feel is the 'common good'?

:? I must be :siao:

Kudos to your altruistic intentions! :salute:

I must admit that looking out for the \"under-priviledged\" is not on my radar.

Partly because my definition of \"under-priviledged\" in the education sense will be more towards those children from broken families who cannot even afford to pay their misc fees, textbooks, uniform and recess meals in the non-popular \"neighbourhood\" schools. That is why i contribute to the ST School Pocket Money fund and children's society on a regular basis.

Pardon me but I really don't feel that those parent's fighting to get their children into popular schools are \"under-privileged\" so to speak.

[3Boys]

lim72:

Read this http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/03/30/why-are-foreigners-allowed-to-join-alumnis/ to find out the true objective of having Alumni.

True according to who? tremeritus? I'd rather read Rupert Murdoch's papers.

Even though I am also in favour of scrapping alumni priority, the tremeritus article is pure bigoted speculative drivel, far from being 'fact'

[vratenza]

vicki:

But i wonder - if REALLY there is a cap, would the 'primary' school student then be 'fighting' with the 'secondary' school students? An interesting thought.

Interesting indeed, and that problem will be limited to those few full schools.
No one can predict the future, even the government, so we shall see how it pans out in the next few years....I'm sure there will be a few more rounds of \"tweaking\" in the next couple of years.

vicki:

My mention of tax was to imply that we all 'pay' to the govt (irregardless of tax brackets) - so i dont see why 'too much' benefit should be given to anyone group based on personal reasons such as those you mention...

Foreigners and PRs pay tax too...some even more than the average SC joes...... and I am hazarding a guess tat you support SC first policy right? So it's totally inappropriate to bring it into the picture.

What's next? COE system for P1 registration? :yikes: :yikes: :yikes:

[verykiasu2010]

3Boys:

Dino_Mummy:

I sort of agree with LOLMum and verykiasu2010.


Reduction of classes, etc is probably the main culprit of limited space.

Nonsense. Just check the size of intakes for Nanyang, Henry Park, RGPS, Pei Hwa, Tao Nan and the like, are they not already well above average?

And it'd be ridiculous for popular schools to just keep adding places.

Sentimentality does not trump fairness. There is no fairness in a hereditary system of Primary school priority admission, just because some parents have a sentimental attachment. We are a democracy, not a monarchy.

Not nonsense NYPS reduced intake from 420 to 390, but still have decent number of places left after alumni, compared with ACS - intake at only 270

hereditary or otherwise, popular school will always be popular, even if NYPS increase the intake to 1000, there will still be complaints of unfairness of not able to get in

[3Boys]

vratenza:

the ABSOLUTE PRIORITY at this point in time are the P1. there is no Absolute priority for P2 at this stage...you can argue till the cows come home on the CAP vs no CAP issue, that's not my fight.

And the list I proposed are just reasons why some parents prefer to choose their alumni for their children. Please read the post carefully and refrain from altering my intentions.

Please do not start stirring the hornet's nest on taxpayer money argument. Some one will come along and ask you which tax bracket are you paying this year.....do you really want to go there?

So some parent's preference is sufficient to become a priority then?

Bill Gates did a great job for Microsoft, he loves the place, they love him = His son has a straight shot to the CEO position then?

Just because one had a rollicking time at one's old school, and one PREFERS that his child attends that school, DOES NOT mean that priority should then be granted.

It is a public school system, paid for in taxes by ALL Singaporeans, why should one set of children have priority over another, on the basis of, yes, I say again, SENTIMENT.

[3Boys]

verykiasu2010:

hereditary or otherwise, popular school will always be popular, even if NYPS increase the intake to 1000, there will still be complaints of unfairness of not able to get in

Therein is the problem, it will be never ending, and therefore, the issue is not so much how many places there are in popular schools, as you now say (but in contradiction to your earlier position that the REDUCTION in places was the main factor), but rather, the priority admission system. That is the problem, the unfair situation in the competition for limited spaces, that one set of CHILDREN have a hereditary advantage over another.