Asia spending billions on tutors: study

[Lilac66]

BeContented:

buds:

Keep u addicted here u mean..

Addicted is a bad bad word.
But seriously, DH has ordered me to stop KSP for the time-being. He claims that if DS does badly for PSLE, it's all KSP's fault. Errr. Becos of my addiction to ksp

same same here. Lately, my laundry bag seems to be bursting at the seams.. my DS's look is alttle more unkempt, on 2nd look , my DH also.. ahem..could be due to the less than desirable ironing. Food wise, well, more brickbats now, funny not that long ago, I was still getting bouquets for the meals. :? I also seem to feel two \"not too friendly\" pairs of eyes looking at me when I'm at the computer. Hmm.. could be just my feeling.


But the straw that broke the camel's back was really when my DH inspected my DS's work and declared \" it's time you time yourself when you log in to KSP. Or allowance may not be in full this month. :nailbite: Got to go cold turkey for a while now

[limlim]

Funz:

limlim:

[quote=\"Funz\"]I remember vividly that VKS2010 and 3boys..

They do share similarities.... :evil:

Actually you too share many similarities with them, even if your views may differ. [/quote]we're not woman?

[Funz]

limlim:

Funz:

[quote=\"limlim\"]
They do share similarities.... :evil:

Actually you too share many similarities with them, even if your views may differ.

we're not woman?[/quote]Ummm...you are not sure about yourself? :evil:

[iFirefly]

buds:

Keep u addicted here u mean..

some ''things'' do keep the MEN addicted here too.. :evil: :siam:

[buds]

\"Things\"...? :scratchhead: Hmmm..

[BeContented]

buds:

\"Things\"...? :scratchhead: Hmmm..

:rotflmao:
It's true. DH peep over when he first saw your earlier avatar. Sure was distracting. :evil:

[Nebbermind]

firefly38:

buds:

Keep u addicted here u mean..

some ''things'' do keep the MEN addicted here too.. :evil: :siam:

me also :scratchhead:

[buds]

BeContented:

buds:

\"Things\"...? :scratchhead: Hmmm..

:rotflmao:
It's true. DH peep over when he first saw your earlier avatar. Sure was distracting. :evil:

But it doesn't bounce anymore what.. cheh.. I even had trouble to include the winking type my avatar specialist BigDevil did for me.

And pls nicely tell ur hubby, \"No dear. I'm not on an adult forum nor porn site.\"

But if we're lucky in between the lines they do dish out sex tips. But then tts only good cos I learn new things... in this case, for you.\" :please:

[Chenonceau]

autumnbronze:

Chenonceau:

I think AB snapped when she read cherryc's bit on wanting \"civilized\" discourse. It was interpreted as \"the alternative camp\" being uncivilized. Actually, I think it was cherryc merely wished to respond to VKS2010's \"rubbish\" remark. So... that ONE spark \"rubbish\" lead to a SECOND spark \"uncivilized\"... and a fire began again.

There was wrong on both sides.


Somewhere, we are reasonable people and do in fact meet in the middle. Even Becontented's posts, once clarified, don't look as unkind as I thought they were. Even limlim has acknowledged a \"bad idea\"


.

This is for Chen.

Hi Chen,

I'd like to please clarify that I did not write my long post because I \"snapped.\" Because we have never met and you do not know me, it may have seem so. But to my cyber (referring to those who have met me and keep in touch with me regularly via sms and meet ups) and personal friends, I am not known as the sort of person who \"snaps.\" And even if I
happened to have lost my cool, the last thing I will do is to start typing a post in response

I wrote it because I wanted to set the record straight on my part and allow those who wish to, to ponder upon my views. And no, lest you think now you have 'offended' me by using the word, let me assure you that you have not like I said, I just want to clarify this and set the record straight.

There may be wrong on both sides, Chen. But I can also say that if you
read the posts closely, you will notice that some SAY it as some SEE it . No maliciousness, no false sweetness, no hidden agenda behind the words.

Some of us do not feign ignorance when pushed to a corner.

Some of us do not even impose our views when we cross over to other
threads (not referring to the assignment one) and try to influence those who may not REALLY be aware of what this discussion is all about. I am beginning to understand what vk meant when he mentioned something to the effect of information not reflecting the true scenario when we post
sweeping statements (my interpretation, not quoting from him) in one of his many posts.

BTW, I have grown to appreciate vk's style of writing and I reckon I am beginning to understand limlim's too.

My 2 cents, Chen :hugs:

Peace :xedfingers:

Ok ok... peace reigns again. That's important.

I am so glad that you're starting to understand limlim too. :rahrah:

He was an enigma to me for a long while. :scratchhead:

And ummm... I admit I haven't read many posts closely... just those in the last 5 pages so I'm a bit lost about the sweetness bit. But I AM glad you're back in here.

[Chenonceau]

limlim:

we're not woman?

I donno lah.... You give people flowers leh... I remember.