MOE Relooking P1 registration - Too much priority to alumni
-
![](\"http://i47.tinypic.com/efxhx.png\")
http://i47.tinypic.com/efxhx.png\">
MOE has given 3 weeks for special breed of people to apply in Phase 2 (which constitutes only 19% of 2013 intake). Whereas the sixteen thousand Phase 2C parents really need more Phases 2C1, 2C2, 2C3, 2C4, 2C5, 2C6 to give them better information for their choice.
With the summary data from the Phase 2C and priority for SC in 1km, 1-2km, 2km abv, PR 1km... and assume that we have 40000 Primary 1 kids in 2013 (for the above chart) .... Probably the MOE would revise n improve the situation for next year.
PS. The above chart clearly give less priority to those living within 100 metres of the school gate of those popular schools in Phase 2C. -
Why show only the popular schools? You mean there are no alternative schools nearby for parents to apply? For instance, there’re YuNeng and Fengshan which are near Red Swastika … surely there are enough school places to go around … fyi, there are 178 primary schools in Singapore.
-
pirate:
:goodpost:
(2) scrap PRs from P2A alumni, because if the parents are alumni and still remain non-SC after such a long time, it says something about their commitment to Singapore.pirate:
they do have separate list but not made known to every one. During result day, they show on ppt slideAbove all else, when GEP schools make public their overall PSLE results, they should have to publish separate numbers for their GEP and non-GEP students. Who knows how many GEP schools have their PSLE statistics inflated by the 'gifted' children who would have done well in any school? Likewise, there should be separate lists of PSLE tops students for GEP and non-GEP.
-
verykiasu2010:
Precisely. Why the reluctance to make this known to everyone?
they do have separate list but not made known to every one. During result day, they show on ppt slidepirate:
Above all else, when GEP schools make public their overall PSLE results, they should have to publish separate numbers for their GEP and non-GEP students. Who knows how many GEP schools have their PSLE statistics inflated by the 'gifted' children who would have done well in any school? Likewise, there should be separate lists of PSLE tops students for GEP and non-GEP. -
pirate:
Precisely. Why the reluctance to make this known to everyone?[/quote]everyone sees it at the result briefing, no need to tell the world lah
they do have separate list but not made known to every one. During result day, they show on ppt slideverykiasu2010:
[quote=\"pirate\"]
Above all else, when GEP schools make public their overall PSLE results, they should have to publish separate numbers for their GEP and non-GEP students. Who knows how many GEP schools have their PSLE statistics inflated by the 'gifted' children who would have done well in any school? Likewise, there should be separate lists of PSLE tops students for GEP and non-GEP. -
verykiasu2010:
everyone sees it at the result briefing, no need to tell the world lah
No lah. Only parents of existing pupils go to the result briefing. So more than 99% of parents in Singapore are excluded. How is that \"everyone\"? If every GEP school is going to be so secretive, might just as well not publish anything at all. Why mislead parents with figures inflated by GEP students? What is wrong with a bit of transparency to help parents make informed decisions?
If the majority of other schools' top students are plucked out and parachuted into a few GEP schools, of course the GEP schools' results will look brilliant compared to the rest.
If parents can see that there are other schools that are just as good as the GEP schools for their non-GEP students (if not better), more may opt for these schools instead of trying to squeeze into the \"brand-name\" GEP schools. This will result in less stress overall for parents every year. -
pirate:
http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/08/07/prs-feel-sore-after-losing-out-to-singaporeans-in-p1-balloting/
(2) scrap PRs from P2A alumni, because if the parents are alumni and still remain non-SC after such a long time, it says something about their commitment to Singapore.
regarding proposed Phase 2D : -
refer article, in Responses to “Balloting for Primary 1 places expected in more than 90 schools, in Phase 2C” (2013 intake) :-
http://www.tremeritus.com/2012/08/02/balloting-for-pri-1-places-expected-in-more-than-90-schools-in-phase-2c/ -
pirate:
nothing secretive about result, nothing misleading, they do have separate result analysis.verykiasu2010:
everyone sees it at the result briefing, no need to tell the world lah
No lah. Only parents of existing pupils go to the result briefing. So more than 99% of parents in Singapore are excluded. How is that \"everyone\"? If every GEP school is going to be so secretive, might just as well not publish anything at all. Why mislead parents with figures inflated by GEP students? What is wrong with a bit of transparency to help parents make informed decisions?
If the majority of other schools' top students are plucked out and parachuted into a few GEP schools, of course the GEP schools' results will look brilliant compared to the rest.
If parents can see that there are other schools that are just as good as the GEP schools for their non-GEP students (if not better), more may opt for these schools instead of trying to squeeze into the \"brand-name\" GEP schools. This will result in less stress overall for parents every year.
if you are interested to know, just call up the school to find out
stress or no stress is entirely up to the parents to regulate themselves -
This is where I don’t understand what you are saying. The question remains why not just post it on the school’s website? If the school thinks that parents are interested enough to justify posting the school’s overall PSLE results breakdown on the school’s website, it is disingenuous to even suggest they think parents won’t be interested in the breakdown between GEP and non-GEP results. It is a very simple thing to do. There is simply no good reason why it is not done. And no, parents can call up the school to ask if they are interested is not a good reason. Why should an interested parent have to call up the school to ask?
This is supposed to be about the education of our children. It is not supposed to be some PR exercise or one-upmanship amongst schools. The whole philosophy is wrong. And if you don’t see that, then sorry, we must just agree to disagree.
Speaking of priorities. Does anybody see anything potentially wrong if all the popular schools here will eventually only have SC students? Would that be a good environment in this current age? -
pirate:
How about schools that eventually only have children of alumni?
Speaking of priorities. Does anybody see anything potentially wrong if all the popular schools here will eventually only have SC students? Would that be a good environment in this current age?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login