IVF baby mix-up - TMC
-
I actually have a very good impression of TMC till the news about IVF that caught me by surprised. Unbelievable to me as I thought, compared to natural delivery, IVF should have a more stringent control procedures.
Both my DS2 and recent DS3 were delivered there i.e. natural delivery. I don’t remember about DS2 as it was 8 years back. But for DS3 i.e. 1 yr back, I’m pretty impressed with the tagging process. The nurse went through a ‘quality’ check with me on the newborn immediately upon delivery… from head to toes, counting fingers etc. and finally tag DS3 in front of me before they delivered him to the nursery. I do have this innate fear about later wrong baby coming out from the nursery, and thus, make an effort to look for birth mark etc., follow the baby to nursery and trying to identify him from the rest… Additional precaution for me…
It will take sometime for TMC to build back its reputation… sigh -
sleepy:
In some Aussie hospital, apart from wrist and ankle tags, the baby's details are written on a sticky tape and taped to the back of baby, from birth. That sticky tape don't come off until the parents decide to peel it off by themselves.
And yes, my baby's ankle tag did drop off. But wrist tag still intact. Nurses were plain careless :x
By the way, I am positive I brought the right baby home. She's a splitting image of her elder sister by her 2nd month -
bebebub:
In some Aussie hospital, apart from wrist and ankle tags, the baby's details are written on a sticky tape and taped to the back of baby, from birth. That sticky tape don't come off until the parents decide to peel it off by themselves.
Now, THAT'S KS :celebrate: -
blur-daddy:
Yes, the QC check on the newborn is impressive. The nurse did the test on the newborn in the delivery room. I remember seeing a piece of paper wrapped with my bb on top of the tags.I actually have a very good impression of TMC till the news about IVF that caught me by surprised. Unbelievable to me as I thought, compared to natural delivery, IVF should have a more stringent control procedures.
Both my DS2 and recent DS3 were delivered there i.e. natural delivery. I don't remember about DS2 as it was 8 years back. But for DS3 i.e. 1 yr back, I'm pretty impressed with the tagging process. The nurse went through a 'quality' check with me on the newborn immediately upon delivery... from head to toes, counting fingers etc. and finally tag DS3 in front of me before they delivered him to the nursery. I do have this innate fear about later wrong baby coming out from the nursery, and thus, make an effort to look for birth mark etc., follow the baby to nursery and trying to identify him from the rest... Additional precaution for me...
It will take sometime for TMC to build back its reputation... *sigh*
It's sad that this happened in a reputable hospital like TMC. The service is great...as good as staying in a hotel -
janet_lee88:
Depends how much u pay bah... also got different wards... same as all other hospitals
It's sad that this happened in a reputable hospital like TMC. The service is great...as good as staying in a hotel
Hotels also have different number of stars
-
The kid is 2 years old Liao... Legal tussle still on-going...
Sad case
:sad:
[quote]THOMSON Fertility Centre (TFC), locked in a legal tussle over how much it should pay a couple suing it for using the wrong sperm, wants the High Court to settle two issues first.
One is whether the sums payable should include the child's upkeep until she grows up and is financially self-reliant.
Two, whether it should pay provisional damages in case she suffers an ailment that is rooted in the biological father's genes.
It wants the court to rule on these issues in court papers filed last month. A High Court hearing has been set for next month.
TFC and three others are being sued over a mix-up in sperm samples that led to a woman having a baby, now two years old, with a stranger's sperm instead of her husband's.[/quote] -
Daddy
[/quote]If I were the biological father, I would tell the couple, \"If you don't want the child, give me lor. Then you don't have to pay for 'upkeep' of the child.\"
The kid is 2 years old Liao... Legal tussle still on-going...
Sad case
:sad:
[quote]THOMSON Fertility Centre (TFC), locked in a legal tussle over how much it should pay a couple suing it for using the wrong sperm, wants the High Court to settle two issues first.
One is whether the sums payable should include the child's upkeep until she grows up and is financially self-reliant.
Two, whether it should pay provisional damages in case she suffers an ailment that is rooted in the biological father's genes.
It wants the court to rule on these issues in court papers filed last month. A High Court hearing has been set for next month.
TFC and three others are being sued over a mix-up in sperm samples that led to a woman having a baby, now two years old, with a stranger's sperm instead of her husband's.
All these lawsuits for upkeep will only cause the poor child to feel that he was not wanted. Why else would they claim for upkeep? I can only imagine the psychological issues when the child grows up. Sometimes people need to think through the long-term ramifications of their chosen course of action. -
pirate:
If I were the biological father, I would tell the couple, \"If you don't want the child, give me lor. Then you don't have to pay for 'upkeep' of the child.\"Daddy
The kid is 2 years old Liao... Legal tussle still on-going...
Sad case
:sad:
[quote]THOMSON Fertility Centre (TFC), locked in a legal tussle over how much it should pay a couple suing it for using the wrong sperm, wants the High Court to settle two issues first.
One is whether the sums payable should include the child's upkeep until she grows up and is financially self-reliant.
Two, whether it should pay provisional damages in case she suffers an ailment that is rooted in the biological father's genes.
It wants the court to rule on these issues in court papers filed last month. A High Court hearing has been set for next month.
TFC and three others are being sued over a mix-up in sperm samples that led to a woman having a baby, now two years old, with a stranger's sperm instead of her husband's.
All these lawsuits for upkeep will only cause the poor child to feel that he was not wanted. Why else would they claim for upkeep? I can only imagine the psychological issues when the child grows up. Sometimes people need to think through the long-term ramifications of their chosen course of action.[/quote]You want the child ? Isn't it piracy at work ? -
pirate:
All these lawsuits for upkeep will only cause the poor child to feel that he was not wanted. Why else would they claim for upkeep? I can only imagine the psychological issues when the child grows up. Sometimes people need to think through the long-term ramifications of their chosen course of action.[/quote]since the accidental genetic sperm mix up already been done -
[quote]THOMSON Fertility Centre (TFC), locked in a legal tussle over how much it should pay a couple suing it for using the wrong sperm, wants the High Court to settle two issues first.
One is whether the sums payable should include the child's upkeep until she grows up and is financially self-reliant.
Two, whether it should pay provisional damages in case she suffers an ailment that is rooted in the biological father's genes.
It wants the court to rule on these issues in court papers filed last month. A High Court hearing has been set for next month.
TFC and three others are being sued over a mix-up in sperm samples that led to a woman having a baby, now two years old, with a stranger's sperm instead of her husband's.
shouldn't the baby follow the father home to be raised, instead of the mother ?
Then father no need to pay anything.
after this unthinkable mistake / incident happen -
will people still dare to go TMC for IVF ? -
i wonder how is their relationship like...
Thomson sperm mix-up case: Mum can sue for expenses of raising daughter
But judge says emotional well-being of child at stake
A woman who was impregnated with another man's sperm instead of her husband's by mistake at a fertility clinic is entitled to sue for the expenses of raising the child she conceived, the High Court has ruled.
Justice Choo Han Teck overturned an earlier decision rejecting her bid. However, he concluded his written judgment by cautioning her that pursuing this claim was against the emotional well-being of the child, named Baby P in the lawsuit.
\"What I now say may not be a principle in law, but I believe that it is a treasured value in humanity, and that is that no parent would want her child to grow up thinking that she (the child) was a mistake,\" said the judge.
Justice Choo said if the woman succeeded in her claim, every cent spent on the child's upbringing will remind her that it was money from a compensation for a mistake. \"Baby P should not ever have to grow up thinking that her very existence was a mistake,\" he said.
http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-ne ... r-20140227
http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-sto ... p-20131005
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login