COP 2012 - For Secondary Schools in 2013

[Melodies]

Parents,


Please continue to post until the cop for eesis offer for non gepper is conclusive.

Thanks!

[WeiHan]

Hi,


I suggest that you put Crescent as first choice. Should it happen that you don’t get crescent, you still stand a chance to appeal if you have placed it as first choice. The COP of schools will definitely rise this year.

My suggestion is based on the assumption that you preference for Anderson over Crescent is very slight. If you like Anderson alot, then you should still place it as first choice for a bet.

[Peony]

Melodies:

Parents,


Please continue to post until the cop for eesis offer for non gepper is conclusive.

Thanks!

Answer to your question to me: this post.

[wonderm]

There is no need to speculate, no need to verify. The cutoff for EESIS varies slightly from year to year, but the eligibility rule is the same.


The following is from MOE website. Note, there is no mention of DSA in the eligibility at all, please do not make it so complicated.

Eligibility
The EESIS are awarded up to the top one-third of the total number of Secondary One pupils admitted to all Independent Schools (IS), based on their PSLE results.

The EESIS is also awarded to P6 GEP pupils who are Singapore Citizens and who
1.meet the P6 GEP promotion criteria, and
2.are enrolled in the IP in an Independent School at S11.

[jtoh]

Melodies:

jtoh:

[quote=\"Melodies\"]

So, non-GEPper with 265 score but has DSA received EESIS

There is a potential case of no EESIS offer for non-GEPper with 265 score but with no DSA offer (in the case of garfield_plus's) - yet to be confirmed - anyone can confirm?

The way EESIS is awarded is very simple and clear cut. It is obvious that the parent in question didn't read his form clearly, as I was trying to point out to him from the start. It's better not to raise speculation over matters which need no speculation. It just serves to confuse the populace who are not well-informed.

My conscious is as clear as crystal! There is no speculation component in my posting n I had specifically mentioned that it has yet to be confirmed but it was then a potential case n I post it mainly for verification purpose. If someone misread and can't comprehend the message n only picked out a small part of the message n make the context out of proportion, that's too bad for that person, only reflect badly on that person.[/quote]Melodies, don't take this the wrong way but you have to careful how you phrase your posts in forums. There are many uninformed parents who take postings as gospel truth. And it will only serve to misinform the populace and lead to rumours. In your post highlighted above, you linked DSA to EESIS. There is no link between the two. Also, you raised the case of the student with 265 with no EESIS. Again, those of us who have experience with EESIS know that that would be impossible and hence advised garfield to check his documents carefully. You instead posted that there is a potential case of non-EESIS for someone with 265. Why would you highlight this when it's already been determined that the COP is 262? And parents have already posted here that T-scores of 263 and 264 have confirmed EESIS?

[GLORYmum]

jtoh:

Melodies, don't take this the wrong way but you have to careful how you phrase your posts in forums. There are many uninformed parents who take postings as gospel truth. And it will only serve to misinform the populace and lead to rumours. In your post highlighted above, you linked DSA to EESIS. There is no link between the two. Also, you raised the case of the student with 265 with no EESIS. Again, those of us who have experience with EESIS know that that would be impossible and hence advised garfield to check his documents carefully. You instead posted that there is a potential case of non-EESIS for someone with 265. Why would you highlight this when it's already been determined that the COP is 262? And parents have already posted here that T-scores of 263 and 264 have confirmed EESIS?

agree with Jtoh, doesn't matter if you had speculated but it will be better to state the fact rather then deduce the fact otherwise pple like me will think it is true and believe faithfully. cheers.

[VALyap]

GLORYmum:

jtoh:

Melodies, don't take this the wrong way but you have to careful how you phrase your posts in forums. There are many uninformed parents who take postings as gospel truth. And it will only serve to misinform the populace and lead to rumours. In your post highlighted above, you linked DSA to EESIS. There is no link between the two. Also, you raised the case of the student with 265 with no EESIS. Again, those of us who have experience with EESIS know that that would be impossible and hence advised garfield to check his documents carefully. You instead posted that there is a potential case of non-EESIS for someone with 265. Why would you highlight this when it's already been determined that the COP is 262? And parents have already posted here that T-scores of 263 and 264 have confirmed EESIS?

agree with Jtoh, doesn't matter if you had speculated but it will be better to state the fact rather then deduce the fact otherwise pple like me will think it is true and believe faithfully. cheers.

Well said! EESIS is given to cohort of top 3%..as long as the student meet the COP
Those that don't get EESIS may not meet the COP 262.

[Melodies]

Peony:

Melodies:

Parents,


Please continue to post until the cop for eesis offer for non gepper is conclusive.

Thanks!

Answer to your question to me: this post.

This is not speculation! Look at the eligibility. Gep has a different criteria. That is the fact!!

[Melodies]

…

[Melodies]

VALyap:

GLORYmum:

[quote=\"jtoh\"]

Melodies, don't take this the wrong way but you have to careful how you phrase your posts in forums. There are many uninformed parents who take postings as gospel truth. And it will only serve to misinform the populace and lead to rumours. In your post highlighted above, you linked DSA to EESIS. There is no link between the two. Also, you raised the case of the student with 265 with no EESIS. Again, those of us who have experience with EESIS know that that would be impossible and hence advised garfield to check his documents carefully. You instead posted that there is a potential case of non-EESIS for someone with 265. Why would you highlight this when it's already been determined that the COP is 262? And parents have already posted here that T-scores of 263 and 264 have confirmed EESIS?

agree with Jtoh, doesn't matter if you had speculated but it will be better to state the fact rather then deduce the fact otherwise pple like me will think it is true and believe faithfully. cheers.

Well said! EESIS is given to cohort of top 3%..as long as the student meet the COP
Those that don't get EESIS may not meet the COP 262.[/quote]Jtoh,GLORYmum n VALyah
Yes, parents have posted but they did not clarify that their dc is not gepper n I wanted to make sure their dc is not gepper since gepper has a different criteria to meet for getting eesis n their t score does not determine whether or not they will get eesis. Hence, all the gepper's t score should be excluded.