COP 2012 - For Secondary Schools in 2013

[notfreemom]

nav14:

Magnumwalls:

Dunman high COP is not 255.


My dd has 256 (254 +2) for higher chinese but got posted to TJC instead.
Now gotto appeal to DHS cause all her clique going there.

I actually expected TJC COP to be higher.

I am also surprised at TJC's COP, considering that there were only 75 places left after 75 places were taken up for DSA.

I think not many ppl aware of TJC offering IP next year. And not many dare to be the first batch of new ip program

[hoskins8h]

Dazzle:

sophieblues:

ACS(I) IB COP is 256 (called sch)

Mine got 256 but did not get in. Perhaps because not Singaporean

The t-score goes to several decimal places. So even though 2 with same integer t-score, are actually different in MOE database. Suggest you appeal. I know of those who were originally rejected (right on COP, even 1 lower) but made it on appeal. There's still movement after the posting results. Also, there's a good number of places for second chance at IB based on Sec 2 year end results which I believe is restricted to current ACSI students (not outsiders). So have to get in first.

[Hollyking]

notfreemom:

alderbaran:

School\t\t2013 \t2012\tChange

NYGH\t\t265\t262\t3
RI\t\t263\t261\t2
RGS\t\t263\t261\t2
HCI\t\t261\t258\t3
NJC\t\t259\t258\t1
MGS (IP)\t\t257\t250\t7
RVHS\t\t256\t254\t2
ACS (I) (IB)\t256\t255\t1
DHS\t\t255\t256\t-`1
SNGS (IP)\t255\t249\t6
CEDAR (IP)\t254\t249\t5
SNGS (O)\t\t253\t249\t4
VSS (IP)\t\t252\t247\t5
CHS (IP)\t\t252\t248\t4
SCGS (IP)\t\t252\t248\t4
MGS (O)\t\t252\t250\t2
SJI (IP)\t\t251\t242\t9
SCGS (O)\t\t251\t248\t3
CEDAR (O)\t251\t249\t2
CHS (O)\t\t249\t248\t1
BPGH\t\t246\t244\t2
ANDERSON\t246\t245\t1
VSS (O)\t\t246\t247\t-1
SJI (O)\t\t245\t242\t3
NAN HUA\t245\t243\t2
CRESCENT\t244\t243\t1
ANGLICAN\t242\t243\t-1
ST. MARGARET\t241\t240\t1
CHIJ (TP)\t\t241\t241\t0
NAN CHIAU\t240\t236\t4
FAIRFIELD\t239\t235\t4
COMMONWEALTH\t238\t236\t2
TKGS\t\t236\t235\t1
NGEE ANN 235 233 2
MARIS STELLA\t232\t232\t0
TKSS\t\t234\t233\t1
PLMGS\t\t234\t233\t1
XINMIN\t\t234\t235\t-1
ZHONGHUA\t233\t232\t1
PRESBYTERIAN\t231\t229\t2
DUNMAN SS\t230\t229\t1
CHIJ ST. THERESA\t229\t224\t5
JURONG\t\t228\t225\t3

TJC IP 251

[Hollyking]

notfreemom:

alderbaran:

School\t\t2013 \t2012\tChange

NYGH\t\t265\t262\t3
RI\t\t263\t261\t2
RGS\t\t263\t261\t2
HCI\t\t261\t258\t3
NJC\t\t259\t258\t1
MGS (IP)\t\t257\t250\t7
RVHS\t\t256\t254\t2
ACS (I) (IB)\t256\t255\t1
DHS\t\t255\t256\t-`1
SNGS (IP)\t255\t249\t6
CEDAR (IP)\t254\t249\t5
SNGS (O)\t\t253\t249\t4
VSS (IP)\t\t252\t247\t5
CHS (IP)\t\t252\t248\t4
SCGS (IP)\t\t252\t248\t4
MGS (O)\t\t252\t250\t2
SJI (IP)\t\t251\t242\t9
SCGS (O)\t\t251\t248\t3
CEDAR (O)\t251\t249\t2
CHS (O)\t\t249\t248\t1
BPGH\t\t246\t244\t2
ANDERSON\t246\t245\t1
VSS (O)\t\t246\t247\t-1
SJI (O)\t\t245\t242\t3
NAN HUA\t245\t243\t2
CRESCENT\t244\t243\t1
ANGLICAN\t242\t243\t-1
ST. MARGARET\t241\t240\t1
CHIJ (TP)\t\t241\t241\t0
NAN CHIAU\t240\t236\t4
FAIRFIELD\t239\t235\t4
COMMONWEALTH\t238\t236\t2
TKGS\t\t236\t235\t1
NGEE ANN 235 233 2
MARIS STELLA\t232\t232\t0
TKSS\t\t234\t233\t1
PLMGS\t\t234\t233\t1
XINMIN\t\t234\t235\t-1
ZHONGHUA\t233\t232\t1
PRESBYTERIAN\t231\t229\t2
DUNMAN SS\t230\t229\t1
CHIJ ST. THERESA\t229\t224\t5
JURONG\t\t228\t225\t3

TJC IP 251

[BlueBells]

With the COP going higher (like COE), must I really push my DD2 harder for her PSLE in a couple of years' time? :scared:

[temptemp]

BlueBells:

With the COP going higher (like COE), must I really push my DD2 harder for her PSLE in a couple of years' time? :scared:

maybe this year P6s are the dragon year babies so more kids more competition?

[Dazzle]

hoskins8h:

Dazzle:

[quote=\"sophieblues\"]

ACS(I) IB COP is 256 (called sch)

Mine got 256 but did not get in. Perhaps because not Singaporean

The t-score goes to several decimal places. So even though 2 with same integer t-score, are actually different in MOE database. Suggest you appeal. I know of those who were originally rejected (right on COP, even 1 lower) but made it on appeal. There's still movement after the posting results.[/quote]Thanks for info. I don't intend to appeal. What will be, will be. It is God's will.

[RVHS]

IP COP change


http://i48.tinypic.com/6t0daf.jpg\">

[nav14]

notfreemom:

nav14:

[quote=\"Magnumwalls\"]Dunman high COP is not 255.


My dd has 256 (254 +2) for higher chinese but got posted to TJC instead.
Now gotto appeal to DHS cause all her clique going there.

I actually expected TJC COP to be higher.

I am also surprised at TJC's COP, considering that there were only 75 places left after 75 places were taken up for DSA.

I think not many ppl aware of TJC offering IP next year. And not many dare to be the first batch of new ip program[/quote]TJC is more established espcially since already have an IP programme for Sec 3 students and have a proven track record for JC. Much better than unknowns like SCGS, SNGS and CHS where they have no IP experience at all and will go on to form a brand new JC which will have many teething problems. Ironically COP for these 3 schools is higher than TJC. I believe got to do more with location as TJC is not as centrally located as the other 3.

[FrekiWang]

The increase in the COP of those ‘top’ schools is consequece of the dragon year.


Based on the formula, 250 is the benchmark for the top 10% candidates. Last year, there were 45261 candidates, but this number has increased to 48333 this year, which means there are 300+ more candidates who have scored 250+ this year. As there is no significant increase in the vacancies in those ‘top’ schools, their COPs certainly go up.