Integrated Programme (IP)

[daisyt]

xxjustakidxx:

RGS and RI are higher. FOr HCI/ NYGH its 200, for RI/RGS its 300

For NYGH, there is also a miscellaneous fee of $750 per annum that covers the following.
Student Protection Plan (Group Insurance)
School newsletter / publicationsed
Pupil transport for events like field trips amd learning jouneys
Registration for selected external competitions
Information & Communication Technologies Education
Subscription for e-portal and e-mail account
Material for Home Economics practicals
Lifeskills camp for lower secondary
Selected sabbaticals
NYAA registration

[xxjustakidxx]

daisyt:

xxjustakidxx:

RGS and RI are higher. FOr HCI/ NYGH its 200, for RI/RGS its 300

For NYGH, there is also a miscellaneous fee of $750 per annum that covers the following.
Student Protection Plan (Group Insurance)
School newsletter / publicationsed
Pupil transport for events like field trips amd learning jouneys
Registration for selected external competitions
Information & Communication Technologies Education
Subscription for e-portal and e-mail account
Material for Home Economics practicals
Lifeskills camp for lower secondary
Selected sabbaticals
NYAA registration

:!:

[lizawa]

Please also note that the school fees are not fixed for the independent IP schools over the 6 years. There are some tiers. For some, Sec 1 /2 belong to 1 tier, Sec 3/4 2nd tier and JC1/2, 3rd tier.


And EESIS now covers only $2400 /year, meaning you have to fork out extra if your school fees exceed this.

[daisyt]

That’s why, from what I know, there are students, able to get in HCI but choosen government IP school because of fees issue.

[cascada]

I’ve heard some parents with children in IP schools said that teachers in IP schools do not teach much. One even said it is because teachers see the students in IP schools as ‘higher calibre’, so they are expected to get what was taught in a short time. Most of the learning were left to the students themselves.

Is this true? Do the students feel helpless?

[wonderm]

cascada:

I've heard some parents with children in IP schools said that teachers in IP schools do not teach much. One even said it is because teachers see the students in IP schools as 'higher calibre', so they are expected to get what was taught in a short time. Most of the learning were left to the students themselves.

Is this true? Do the students feel helpless?

Most students in IP schools are able to cope well with different teaching style, which requires more independent learning. From what I see, the teachers do teach, even though they may seem to be \"facilitating\" discussions rather than \"teaching\".

[longreach]

During the teacher-parents meeting. One teacher mentioned that their teaching method instill a lot on critical thinking and investigating work. Could be quite different from other sec school where some may focus on teaching students how to pass exams.

[cascada]

Thanks, wonderm & longreach.


I’m worry cos I keep hearing comments such as "Teachers in IP schools don’t teach".

wonderm, you mentioned that some of these teachers are more like facilitators. I’d think that facilitation is a good learning method when applied on people with some personal experiences. It may be a useful way to deliver certain subjects but I believe some subjects still need to be taught and not facilitated.

I have friends with kids in IP schools who are not doing well although their pri academic results were consistently above average. Whereas those with kids in usual sec schools seemed to be doing well in their recent tests. I wonder is it the subject delivery method or the syllabus that resulted in this difference.

DS1 is in P6 this year and hopes to get into IP school, but I’ve my own reservation from all the hearsay.

My concern is when a P6 transits to S1 and is in IP, he will definitely need time to adjust to a rather different method of teaching. And if the teachers in IP schools are leaving it to him to sink or swim, then the level of stress will be very intense.

[wonderm]

cascada:

Thanks, wonderm & longreach.


wonderm, you mentioned that some of these teachers are more like facilitators. I'd think that facilitation is a good learning method when applied on people with some personal experiences. It may be a useful way to deliver certain subjects but I believe some subjects still need to be taught and not facilitated.

Just to clarify, I don't mean the teachers only facilitate. There are times where they facilitate discussions among students, there are times they teach of course. On the other hand, I understand your concern. While most students who make it to IP school should be able to adapt and cope with the teaching style, there may be some who find it difficult and prefer the traditional teaching.

[cascada]

Thanks for your clarification, wonderm.