Dora1:I guess it also depends on whether the witness has interest in the case, a more creditable witness account is one that's from someone that has no interest.Harlequin:I will be more worry if our law enforcement officers start to penalize civilian with witness accounts alone... imagine this, a group of people give an correlated rehearsed witness account against someone that they hold grudge to! That will be dark age of law.
Yes, there'll always be a grey area whereby the law can't protect without the admissible evident, but that's what law is, impartial -- we can't convict people based on other(s) account alone.
Thanks Nebbermind for the link. So there are laws against harressment - good to know that.
Harlequin, you may be right, but what is the chance that all the neighbours from different ages and background come together to gang up against a person with statements that can stand up to the court. And I am sure the police will know how to interrogate such that they will be able to pick up loopholes should there be pre-rehearsed statements - they are the professionals here.
I am not a law expert, but if a group of people saw a man push someone off the buidling, would he get convicted from witness accounts alone if there are no other material evidence? Or he can go scot free?
In any crime, the witness shall be the first suspect, until he/she is proven to be otherwise, and eliminated from the suspect list..... This, many do not aware.
If a husband reports his wife's murder, the husband would be the prime suspect (in any country's law), because he has an interest in his wife's death.
Common law are also about common sense, it assumed everybody do things out of their own interest.