* Eunoia JC (EJC)
-
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900891\" time=\"1551605618\" user_id=\"153793:
What a twisted interpretation! Your logic is simply convoluted. That EJC parent’s simple statement centres on EJC but did not exclude or deny the value-add of other JCs but you, plain jealous that EJC can value-add, chose to interpret that statement in a selfish manner which nobody else thinks this way. The parent is only praising EJC and you must take it that she is insinuating about your granddaughter’s JC? Saying well about EJC doesn’t mean speaking ill of other JCs. Poked your sore point is it?
People who read first statement: its telling us that other JCs with single digit COP didnt value add as much when Compared to EJC.lee_yl\" post_id=\"1900879\" time=\"1551601779\" user_id=\"17023:
I went back to read page 73.
Grandyma, ppl said “I think EJC did very well. With a mean UAS of 82.x, taking into account its COP was 10 previously, it is really value-adding compared to the other JCs whose COP was single digit”
I find nothing wrong with the statement. There is a condition attached because EJC took in JAE students with COP 10. You chose to selectively misrepresent that statement and mislead others. Why did you choose to twist the story in your favor? Talking about misleading the public!
As an analogy, I can say that I think my daughter’s primary school did “very well” in nurturing her. The equivalent is you choosing to twist the story into saying, wa, are you saying your daughter primary school is number one ah?
Isnt it what this statement mean?
Then you explain 'really value adding compared' mean what?
Unless I misinterpreted but i Didnt mislead the public bc I didnt say \"other single digit JCs really value added Compared to EJC\" such a statement.
From your last statement about \" your daughter Pri School....\" pls dont put words into my mouth...I will interpret and say \" your gal Pri Sch has done a good job\".
What num 1 school?
Stuff words in your mouth? You don’t know what an analogy mean? People mentioned “very well” only, you quickly and selectively dish out academic data of other schools to prove otherwise. No?
You twist and turn until as if EJC parents are claiming EJ to be number 3 (after RI/HCI). If I didn’t go back to re-read page 73, I wouldn’t have known how you actually chop off the other half of ppl’s statement. Given your Ah Ma age, I wonder if you were one of those 红卫兵，so adept at 断章取义。 -
lee_yl\" post_id=\"1900900\" time=\"1551608864\" user_id=\"17023:
What a twisted interpretation! Your logic is simply convoluted. That EJC parent’s simple statement centres on EJC but did not exclude or deny the value-add of other JCs but you, plain jealous that EJC can value-add, chose to interpret that statement in a selfish manner which nobody else thinks this way. The parent is only praising EJC and you must take it that she is insinuating about your granddaughter’s JC? Saying well about EJC doesn’t mean speaking ill of other JCs. Poked your sore point is it?
People who read first statement: its telling us that other JCs with single digit COP didnt value add as much when Compared to EJC.Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900891\" time=\"1551605618\" user_id=\"153793:
[quote=lee_yl post_id=1900879 time=1551601779 user_id=17023]I went back to read page 73.
Grandyma, ppl said “I think EJC did very well. With a mean UAS of 82.x, taking into account its COP was 10 previously, it is really value-adding compared to the other JCs whose COP was single digit”
I find nothing wrong with the statement. There is a condition attached because EJC took in JAE students with COP 10. You chose to selectively misrepresent that statement and mislead others. Why did you choose to twist the story in your favor? Talking about misleading the public!
As an analogy, I can say that I think my daughter’s primary school did “very well” in nurturing her. The equivalent is you choosing to twist the story into saying, wa, are you saying your daughter primary school is number one ah?
Isnt it what this statement mean?
Then you explain 'really value adding compared' mean what?
Unless I misinterpreted but i Didnt mislead the public bc I didnt say \"other single digit JCs really value added Compared to EJC\" such a statement.
From your last statement about \" your daughter Pri School....\" pls dont put words into my mouth...I will interpret and say \" your gal Pri Sch has done a good job\".
What num 1 school?
Stuff words in your mouth? You don’t know what an analogy mean? People mentioned “very well” only, you quickly and selectively dish out academic data of other schools to prove otherwise. No?
You twist and turn until as if EJC parents are claiming EJ to be number 3 (after RI/HCI). If I didn’t go back to re-read page 73, I wouldn’t have known how you actually chop off the other half of ppl’s statement. Given your Ah Ma age, I wonder if you were one of those 红卫兵，so adept at 断章取义。[/quote]Chill lah...
Already told you to read statement 'that used word 'Compared'.
I didnt chop off any half statement.
If you dk, then its ok.
Chill lah...EJC still did well but again not until it \" really value add compared to single digit JCs\"
Peace. -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900863\" time=\"1551599299\" user_id=\"153793:
But you are the one that say school with IP kids must do better lei.
Like that ah...but we dont separate IP schools , semi IP and non IP schools.Grandypa\" post_id=\"1900853\" time=\"1551596833\" user_id=\"154562:
RV, DHS? Not fair lei. 100% IP kids. I thought you always said got IP kids must do v good ?
EJC only 75% IP kids. Can compare like this ah. You quite biased
Then how?
RV and DHS has 100% IP kids definitely will do much better. So how can that prove they are better in Econs than EJC? :siao: -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900868\" time=\"1551600290\" user_id=\"153793:
Wah...try to backtrack now.....
Chill lah...see that you upset..
Did i say other JCs all subjects did better than EJC?
I did praise EJC did well and some subjects scored well.
My point is 1 parent or some said EJC value added more than other single digit JCs which not true as it has subj eg Econ,CSC didnt fare that well.
On page 75 you said \"EJC results didnt do better than the rest of the top tier JCs lei...\"
So when you say results, you are ONLY talking about Econs??
If you are only talking about Econs, than why say resultSs? You could just say Econs unless you are just trying to mislead by telling a half-truth to taint EJC which proves once again you are a consummate liar. -
stetan\" post_id=\"1900909\" time=\"1551611968\" user_id=\"3358:
Ok, I should have said \" subjects\" like Econs, CSC...
Wah...try to backtrack now.....Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900868\" time=\"1551600290\" user_id=\"153793:
Chill lah...see that you upset..
Did i say other JCs all subjects did better than EJC?
I did praise EJC did well and some subjects scored well.
My point is 1 parent or some said EJC value added more than other single digit JCs which not true as it has subj eg Econ,CSC didnt fare that well.
On page 75 you said \"EJC results didnt do better than the rest of the top tier JCs lei...\"
So when you say results, you are ONLY talking about Econs??
If you are only talking about Econs, than why say resultSs? You could just say Econs unless you are just trying to mislead by telling a half-truth to taint EJC which proves once again you are a consummate liar. -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900891\" time=\"1551605618\" user_id=\"153793:
I made that statement and I stand by it. that statement was conditional on the fact that EJC COP was only 9 compared to some JCs that had 5 or 6. I also did show the COP of the JCs and there were 8 schools that had better COP than EJC and EJC's UAS of 82.4 was comparable to them e.g NJC and VJC. On the other hand, you showed no facts to substantiate your points except a single Econs result and 3 JCs of which 2 had 100% IP kids. As Vivian would say, you are just creating a red herring - information which is or is intended to be misleading.
People who read first statement: its telling us that other JCs with single digit COP didnt value add as much when Compared to EJC.
Isnt it what this statement mean?
Then you explain 'really value adding compared' mean what?
Unless I misinterpreted but i Didnt mislead the public bc I didnt say \"other single digit JCs really value added Compared to EJC\" such a statement.
From your last statement about \" your daughter Pri School....\" pls dont put words into my mouth...I will interpret and say \" your gal Pri Sch has done a good job\".
What num 1 school? -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900903\" time=\"1551609225\" user_id=\"153793:
Please provide the results of ALL the other subjects to prove your claim. Otherwise, you are again fabricating stories and a consummate liar again
Chill lah...EJC still did well but again not until it \" really value add compared to single digit JCs\"
Peace.
I am still waiting for it...... -
thsheng99\" post_id=\"1900912\" time=\"1551612675\" user_id=\"37400:
VJC is not full IP.
I made that statement and I stand by it. that statement was conditional on the fact that EJC COP was only 9 compared to some JCs that had 5 or 6. I also did show the COP of the JCs and there were 8 schools that had better COP than EJC and EJC's UAS of 82.4 was comparable to them e.g NJC and VJC. On the other hand, you showed no facts to substantiate your points except a single Econs result and 3 JCs of which 2 had 100% IP kids. As Vivian would say, you are just creating a red herring - information which is or is intended to be misleading.Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900891\" time=\"1551605618\" user_id=\"153793:
People who read first statement: its telling us that other JCs with single digit COP didnt value add as much when Compared to EJC.
Isnt it what this statement mean?
Then you explain 'really value adding compared' mean what?
Unless I misinterpreted but i Didnt mislead the public bc I didnt say \"other single digit JCs really value added Compared to EJC\" such a statement.
From your last statement about \" your daughter Pri School....\" pls dont put words into my mouth...I will interpret and say \" your gal Pri Sch has done a good job\".
What num 1 school?
EJC COP of 9 point consisted 25% JAE only, so 75% IP kids still more.
How u calculate EJC UAS 82.4 is comparable to the JCs with 5-6? Or what you mean by this statement? -
Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900914\" time=\"1551613223\" user_id=\"153793:
If I am not wrong, VJC UAS is around 83.x, EJC UAS is 82.4 - diff is 1.x points
VJC is not full IP.thsheng99\" post_id=\"1900912\" time=\"1551612675\" user_id=\"37400:
I made that statement and I stand by it. that statement was conditional on the fact that EJC COP was only 9 compared to some JCs that had 5 or 6. I also did show the COP of the JCs and there were 8 schools that had better COP than EJC and EJC's UAS of 82.4 was comparable to them e.g NJC and VJC. On the other hand, you showed no facts to substantiate your points except a single Econs result and 3 JCs of which 2 had 100% IP kids. As Vivian would say, you are just creating a red herring - information which is or is intended to be misleading.
EJC COP of 9 point consisted 25% JAE only, so 75% IP kids still more.
How u calculate EJC UAS 82.4 is comparable to the JCs with 5-6? Or what you mean by this statement?
VJC COP was 5 for science, EJC COP was 9 for science - diff is 4 points
Please do your own maths. -
thsheng99\" post_id=\"1900915\" time=\"1551613753\" user_id=\"37400:
If I am not wrong, VJC UAS is around 83.x, EJC UAS is 82.4 - diff is 1.x points
VJC is not full IP.Grandyma\" post_id=\"1900914\" time=\"1551613223\" user_id=\"153793:
[quote=thsheng99 post_id=1900912 time=1551612675 user_id=37400]
I made that statement and I stand by it. that statement was conditional on the fact that EJC COP was only 9 compared to some JCs that had 5 or 6. I also did show the COP of the JCs and there were 8 schools that had better COP than EJC and EJC's UAS of 82.4 was comparable to them e.g NJC and VJC. On the other hand, you showed no facts to substantiate your points except a single Econs result and 3 JCs of which 2 had 100% IP kids. As Vivian would say, you are just creating a red herring - information which is or is intended to be misleading.
EJC COP of 9 point consisted 25% JAE only, so 75% IP kids still more.
How u calculate EJC UAS 82.4 is comparable to the JCs with 5-6? Or what you mean by this statement?
VJC COP was 5 for science, EJC COP was 9 for science - diff is 4 points
Please do your own maths.[/quote]When Stetan advised me to use \" Econ\" instead of results....ok, i corrected myself.
You?
Btw, UAS diff of 1.x cant compare to COP of 4 points.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login