2010 P1 Registration Exercise for 2011 In-Take
-
buds:
Orrh... the \"laojiao\" must be the PSG right?The few PVs we met have 2 or 3 children in the school already.
Their eldest were at least in P6. A couple of them have eldest
oredi in sec sch but still have young ones in P3 and P4.
They're the solid force that rounds the school support system.
I :salute: their commitment man... so many years already.
The main sch staff will still be the one in charge of finalizing
the checks.
As for blur... i think the relief teachers are
more blur than the *lao jiaos. (*Old timer PVs)
No offence intended to relief(s) out there...
:siam:
Bo bian bah... have to sign-on for 6 yrs till their kids graduate from the sch
-
Daddy
Yap, the PSG.
Orrh... the \"laojiao\" must be the PSG right?
Bo bian bah... have to sign-on for 6 yrs till their kids graduate from the sch
Sign-on arh? Sounds like NS leh. :lol:
But they're truly helpful and extremely commited. :salute: -
i3mum:
I was suprised by this year phase 2A2, there are so many applications & successfully got in, when I thought 2004 birthrates are lower than 2003.
I was wondering as well... some other schs I noticed also had bigger jump in Phase 2A... could be SG low birthrates.... but high PR intake... n thus not born in SG? Just my guess....
-
Or the higher birth rates only came from specific districts?
Meaning for example⦠mommy residents within NYPS give
birth to more children than say⦠Clementi? -
Daddy
My boy was born in 2004, from what I understand it during that time is the 1 batch of baby bonus... so u know lar. :roll:
i3mum:
I was suprised by this year phase 2A2, there are so many applications & successfully got in, when I thought 2004 birthrates are lower than 2003.
I was wondering as well... some other schs I noticed also had bigger jump in Phase 2A... could be SG low birthrates.... but high PR intake... n thus not born in SG? Just my guess....
-
vios4043:
My boy was born in 2004, from what I understand it during that time is the 1 batch of baby bonus... so u know lar. :roll:[/quote]That means the ministry's birthrate stats not accurate one lah....Daddy

[quote=\"i3mum\"] I was suprised by this year phase 2A2, there are so many applications & successfully got in, when I thought 2004 birthrates are lower than 2003.
I was wondering as well... some other schs I noticed also had bigger jump in Phase 2A... could be SG low birthrates.... but high PR intake... n thus not born in SG? Just my guess....
-
Daddy
That means the ministry's birthrate stats not accurate one lah.... :)[/quote]I was also wondering coz see from the stats, 2004 not as high as previous years..
My boy was born in 2004, from what I understand it during that time is the 1 batch of baby bonus... so u know lar. :roll:vios4043:
[quote=\"Daddy D\"]
I was wondering as well... some other schs I noticed also had bigger jump in Phase 2A... could be SG low birthrates.... but high PR intake... n thus not born in SG? Just my guess....
-
autumn82:
Cham... later 2005 birthrate also need to +++ liao.... FAIL....
I was also wondering coz see from the stats, 2004 not as high as previous years.. -
Mine born in 2003, oso got baby bonus.

Is 2004 1st batch? :? -
buds:
2004 is 1st batch with S$3000 cash bonus for 1st child.Mine born in 2003, oso got baby bonus.

Is 2004 1st batch? :?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better π
Register Login10
Online211.4k
Users34.6k
Topics1.8m
PostsMaths
English
Chinese
Multiple subjects