Discussion on Dr Ong Teck Chin

[verykiasu2010]

those are totally different kind of scenarios for any comparison at all


越描越黑

one has the position of power and top authority, the other has not

one is a newbie, the other is an old bird who sets the system

[autumnbronze]

Its okie, I did not expect all to see the similarities. Especially when the stone has been cast from their point of view.


From the very long story that didn’t seem to have any bearing at all, here’s the similarity (to me at least) - one was disproved (and not that he had done anything wrong) without ‘proper investigation.’ The other is being cast negatively by members of the public even before there is any official conclusion to the proper investigation.

Is that obvious now?? If not, like I said, its okie. To each his own.

Doesn’t matter to me whether one is a Newbie or one is in a position of power (errrrrrr, but he doesn’t hold THE ultimate authority right??).

They are both humans.

Anyway, coming back to the subject matter, or person, why is there an intense need to want to prove him (or want him to be) guilty when an official ‘verdict’ is not out yet?

But then again this is a public forum, and we are free to express our views, right??

No need to respond to this post. I will not be able to have the time to follow up on this thread. Too intense in a warped sense.

Again, my VERY humble opinion.

[Nebbermind]

think mankind just love the smell of blood!! :lol:


I was just wondering whether all these speculations can be considered cyber-bullying? :?

[atutor2001]

Piggy Lim:

Hi

Just like to know if IB students are not well accepted (entry) into local Uni. Heard those who take IB will most likely have to go oversea Uni. Is this true? My son is now in ACS(J) just want to find out more from experience mom. Thanks!

This one should be rumour. Otherwise there will be tons of complaints in the press.

[atutor2001]

Nebbermind:

think mankind just love the smell of blood!! :lol:


I was just wondering whether all these speculations can be considered cyber-bullying? :?

It is more a case of trust in the school Board. If the whole incident is found to be an unfounded allegation subsequently, it will be very awkward for the school Board . The board has accepted his resignation so quickly and starts searching for a new principal. A rational reaction expected from the board (to accommodate his request because of health reason) would be to persuade him to stay on till the end of the year so as to minimise disruption. Unless we add in a new dimension to the conspiracy theory - someone in the board is also involved......

[Muffins]

verykiasu2010:

Muffins:

What about this:


Dr. Ong is innocent, and this teacher was his assistant.

Because he was angry that OTC had fired him, he had turned a little :siao: When OTC had stepped out, who says he couldn't have left his phone there to charge, or that he left his email on, to save time from logging in. This assistant, could have himself sent messages and emails. And who would keep thosse messages? If I were him, getting those types of messages from someone, I wouldn't keep them, I would delete them, unless I knew that he was going to be interrogated by the police about it.

What do you guys think?

Then all the more OTC must not resign hastily. Be should lodge a police report on criminal trespass and misuse of computer, and throw that accuser to Changi Hilton. He should be more clever than a non-contest and quit hastily to say want to go overseas to accumulate experience with a heart problem and suspected heart attack

But how can prove it leh???

If he says he didn't, then how to have concrete proof that what he's saying is true? How do we know whether anything is true anymore? Naturally, I tend to swing to Dr. Ong's side, not because I'm an ACS(I) student, but because he is married, with children, who are in a world-renowned school, and he has brought the school so far. I, personally, cannot believe that he could have done anything like that.

However, there's always the saying \"wolf in sheep's clothing\".

Dunno who to trust anymore.... :faint: :scratchhead: :clubmyself: :siam:

[csc]

You are right, muffins…there is no one righteous . a lot of righteous acts are like filthy rags, i quote…

[Muffins]

hi csc! long time no talk!


what you're saying is right....

I that this will get over before exams. our class periods are being taken over because of this, and we're losing valuable studying time... O_O

[csc]

muffins,


just focus on the major now…which is to study hard for your year end exams… that’s ur responsibility…

As for the other affairs, we just pray that everything will be straightened out soon… we need to balance grace with truth… it is difficult from a human perspective…don’t know if u understand

[WeiHan]

Muffins:

What about this:


Dr. Ong is innocent, and this teacher was his assistant.

Because he was angry that OTC had fired him, he had turned a little :siao: When OTC had stepped out, who says he couldn't have left his phone there to charge, or that he left his email on, to save time from logging in. This assistant, could have himself sent messages and emails. And who would keep thosse messages? If I were him, getting those types of messages from someone, I wouldn't keep them, I would delete them, unless I knew that he was going to be interrogated by the police about it.

What do you guys think?

Muffin. It seems that you know or have speculated what are the contents in those emails. What is your speculation?

In fact, I disagree that if one receives unusual emails from their superior, they will delete them. The normal action shuld be to retain them. Similarly, one don't delete or throw away love letters from their lovers immediately after reading....in fact quite the opposite, people keep them.