Logo
    • Education
      • Pre-School
      • Primary Schools Directory
      • Primary Schools Articles
      • P1 Registration
      • DSA
      • PSLE
      • Secondary
      • Tertiary
      • Special Needs
    • Lifestyle
      • Well-being
    • Activities
      • Events
    • Enrichment & Services
      • Find A Service Provider
      • Enrichment Articles
      • Enrichment Services
      • Tuition Centre/Private Tutor
      • Infant Care/ Childcare / Student Care Centre
      • Kindergarten/Preschool
      • Private Institutions and International Schools
      • Special Needs
      • Indoor & Outdoor Playgrounds
      • Paediatrics
      • Neonatal Care
    • Forum
    • ASKQ
    • Register
    • Login

    2011 P1 Registration Exercise for 2012 In-Take

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Primary Schools - Selection & Registration
    3.1k Posts 327 Posters 910.7k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • phtthpP Offline
      phtthp
      last edited by

      if very tiring for current P and HODs to run around 2 branches maintain the same standard, perhaps MOE can invite past retired ex P and ex HODs (on pension scheme) to start 2nd branch. Though retired, but these ex staff had many golden years of much valuable, precious teaching experience and knowledge of culture in these schools.


      In fact, they are the founders. They are the ones who laid the name down for the school to such high prominence today. They’ll know what to do, how to set up, rather than take in fresh Ps or new green horns who had no related experience with these Top Tier 1 hot, popular schools.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • J Offline
        jtoh
        last edited by

        zeemimi:
        Fur-ma:

        FYI and especially for those parents who, like me, are waiting till the 2nd day of 2B to see how many have applied and start calculating the chances of getting their child into their dream school - I called AT and asked if they will reveal out of the number of applicants staying <1km, how many are Sporeans so that I can calculate more accurately my dd's chances. They said will only give the number of applicants, no breakdown given. So in summary, can calculate till the cows come home, but will never be able to calculate correctly. Sigh... getting in boils down to pure luck :frustrated:


        Actually i believe there is no directives from MOE whether schs can reveal the numbers or the breakdowns.

        DH used to work in a sch and has seen through 2 principals. First P was a nice person, didn't want to give parents false hopes. So advised those who clearly can't make it to apply else where. Second P wanted balloting and inflated numbers to make the sch look very popular. Admin staff were told to accept every application and not to reveal numbers.

        What to do? 🤷

        Oh dear! Now we know. :yikes:

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • V Offline
          vicki
          last edited by

          phtthp:
          if very tiring for current P and HODs to run around 2 branches maintain the same standard, perhaps MOE can invite past retired ex P and ex HODs (on pension scheme) to start 2nd branch. Though retired, but these ex staff had many golden years of much valuable, precious teaching experience and knowledge of culture in these schools.


          In fact, they are the founders. They are the ones who laid the name down for the school to such high prominence today. They'll know what to do, how to set up, rather than take in fresh Ps or new green horns who had no related experience with these Top Tier 1 hot, popular schools.
          Just wondering, like that might as well just have MOE set all the exam papers n teaching material... Then there won't be a popular school prob liao!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • phtthpP Offline
            phtthp
            last edited by

            Yes, clone all primary schools in SG to follow Nanyang high standard.

            all pupils sit for common exam qns, common tests.
            everything all common.

            then there won’t be clamoring of anymore hot, popular school.
            all these will become history.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • phtthpP Offline
              phtthp
              last edited by

              in fact, will resolve all issues / headache.


              for P1 - P6 psle, all pupils to sit for common exams, common tests for all subjects (english, maths, chinese, science) across the board.

              no more popular school … becomes history of the past.
              no need what phase 1, 2A1, 2A2, 2B, 2C, 3.
              no need balloting < 1km, between 1 to 2 km, > 2 km … all these will become history.

              children just need to study the nearest school nearby, bec standard tested is going to be the same. Children just walk to nearest school, no need take school bus.

              every school in SG to follow Nanyang high standard.
              even non-popular schools will get populated.
              enough schools to educate all SG kids, PR kids, foreigner kids.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • C Offline
                CayennePepper
                last edited by

                phtthp:

                all pupils sit for common exam qns, common tests.
                everything all common.
                But... many parents already buy exam papers from popular schools for their kids to work on mah.
                Replicate the teaching methodology, maybe. Cos we already 'sit' for the same tests and exams! 😉

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C Offline
                  CayennePepper
                  last edited by

                  zhuangzi:
                  CayennePepper:


                  That's why I'm for the phasing out of P2A2, where parents are ex student but did not join alumni.

                  Er, then the ex-students will just join the alumni, i guess. No difference to the total number of vacancies taken up actually at the conclusion of the phase. Actually i think it's pointless having 2A1 and 2A2, might as well as combine these two. It will be a lot easier for schools to gauge the potential number of 2A applicants if they can just refer to the alumni list.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • 3 Offline
                    30plus
                    last edited by

                    phtthp:
                    Yes, clone all primary schools in SG to follow Nanyang high standard.

                    all pupils sit for common exam qns, common tests.
                    everything all common.

                    then there won't be clamoring of anymore hot, popular school.
                    all these will become history.
                    It's quite unbelievable you have such idea. What kind of next generation we are shaping? Robots? :roll:

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Z Offline
                      zhuangzi
                      last edited by

                      CayennePepper:
                      zhuangzi:

                      [quote=\"CayennePepper\"]
                      That's why I'm for the phasing out of P2A2, where parents are ex student but did not join alumni.

                      Er, then the ex-students will just join the alumni, i guess. No difference to the total number of vacancies taken up actually at the conclusion of the phase. Actually i think it's pointless having 2A1 and 2A2, might as well as combine these two. It will be a lot easier for schools to gauge the potential number of 2A applicants if they can just refer to the alumni list.[/quote]At least the school can have a better understanding of the number of possible registrants, and adjust the number of PV accordingly.

                      I reiterate the whole P1 registration process need a thorough re-look. It has been more than 20 years since it was first introduced.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • phtthpP Offline
                        phtthp
                        last edited by

                        in fact, schools should plan 3 yrs ahead in advance.


                        for better, more proper planning coordination & administration effort to estimate a more reliable figure, we need co-operation from all Phases 1 to 2B, so as to help determine a more realistic number of parent volunteers for acceptance.

                        3 years ahead before due registration in July 20YY:-
                        ==============================================

                        a) for Phase 1 siblings - 3 yrs ahead, schools to send out application forms to all parents, indicating clearly whether any sibling(s) from existing current pupils likely to enrol, and enrol for which year 20YY.


                        b) for Phase 2A - combine all ex alumni (P2A1 and P2A2) members together.

                        all ex-alumni parents who intend to enrol their child in that particular school, to fill up an application form 3 yrs ahead in advance to alert and notify the school that your child is coming in which year, 20YY.

                        in each year - all schools to standardize the announcement of a closing date line application of acceptance, to receive back all these incoming ex-alumni application forms for year 20YY.

                        whether to make it compulsory to make ex-alumni parents pay one time alumni membership fees or not, let the school's alumni committee team decide on this issue.

                        c) for Phase 2B GRC grassroot leaders, submit ahead 2 yrs in advance to People's Association HQ, indicating the school of choice for yr child.

                        with reliable figures coming in from sources (a) to (b), schools can receive proper information to work upon. From here, determine how many parent volunteers (PV) can accept realistically for P2B, even if there is a need to cut 1 class. This way, dun turn away any disappointed PV.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 206
                        • 207
                        • 208
                        • 209
                        • 210
                        • 310
                        • 311
                        • 208 / 311
                        • First post
                          Last post



                        Online Users

                        Statistics

                        7

                        Online

                        210.8k

                        Users

                        34.3k

                        Topics

                        1.8m

                        Posts
                        Popular Topics
                        New to the KiasuParents forum? Tips and Tricks!
                        Choosing and Evaluating Primary Schools
                        DSA 2026
                        PSLE Discussions and Strategies
                        How much do you spend on the kids' tuition/enrichments?
                        SkillsFuture + anything related to upskilling/learning something new!

                          About Us Contact Us forum Terms of Service Privacy Policy