2012 P1 Registration Exercise for 2013 In-Take

wongsansan

BigDevil:
SAHM_TAN:
Correct me if I'm wrong but that date is only applicable for 2011 registration to enter P1 in 2012 right? For wongsansan case, it should be a later date.

You are absolutely right. That date is forever updated with each P1 registration. The guideline is the last sentence of the quoted text:

Parents must move into the new property within two years of the child’s entry into Primary One.

so if i buy the condo in 2011, the place get completed in 2014 (assuming), then i rent it out, i dont think i will be making a nice profit, probably just to cover the mortage and maintenance fee and maybe be left with a couple of hundreds every month? i think that will work right? i don't have to physically stay there right?

SAHM_TAN

Errr…the add. u submit for P1 registration, u have to be physically living in it…

If u rent out and that person also uses your add to apply for P1 reg at the same school, then how?

BigDevil

wongsansan:
BigDevil:

Parents must move into the new property within two years of the child’s entry into Primary One.
so if i buy the condo in 2011, the place get completed in 2014 (assuming), then i rent it out, i dont think i will be making a nice profit, probably just to cover the mortage and maintenance fee and maybe be left with a couple of hundreds every month? i think that will work right? i don't have to physically stay there right?

I think you need to read that again. It says

MUST MOVE IN....

:roll:

hquek

I did entertain that thought briefly…to use the address of a property that was tenanted out (and I won’t stay there). But someone reminded me that tenancy agreements are e-stamped - ie IRAS knows that the property has been tenanted out, so how can I still be staying there.

Anyway, decided to be rational and enrol my child in a school that is within where I physically stay. Better to play safe and sleep well at night, than have to worry about ‘pichar lobang’.

Worked out for the best becos the slightly further away school would have been a minor logistic nightmare compared to my kid’s current school. And I can stand tall and proud.

wongsansan

@hquek

yup! you are right

i think we just have to replan our whole move again, thanks for the advice guys !

phtthp

hi wongsansan,

where is Tao Nan shifting to - temporary or permanent shift ? which year start to shift ?

phtthp

hi ksks3mum,

a) Nan Hua

how was phase 2C balloting (2011) like for schools in Clementi ?

http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=358&p=517099#p517099

http://www.nanhuapri.moe.edu.sg/

Nan Hua was hot amongst Clementi residents==> 3 times over-subscibed (take 84 / 28), at phase 2C.

b) Fairfield

how was phase 2C balloting (2011) like for schools in Queenstown ?

http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=408&p=517117#p517117

compared to Nan Hua (over-subscribed at 3 times), Fairfield is over subscribed at ==> 1.14 times (take 56 / 49). So, Nan Hua is even tougher to get in.

phtthp

phtthp

discussion on Bukit Timah schools (by parents in the past):-

http://www.singaporemotherhood.com/forumboard/messages/353638/946233.html?1257816227

LOLMum

phtthp:
how hot are popular schools in Singapore ?

number of times over subscribed ?

may refer past balloting compiled data for phase 2C (2011):-

a) Ang Mo Kio

http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=415&start=300

b)\tBedok

http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=3487&start=250..........................................................................................................

z)\tYishun

http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=242&start=310

ai) Woodlands

http://www.kiasuparents.com/kiasu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=265&start=290

:salute: phtthp, not just this thread but others as well.

2012 P1 Registration Exercise for 2013 In-Take

5

211.1k

34.4k

1.8m