Principal of top school under investigation for hiring prost

[limlim]

Way2GO:

limlim, u d bad. Some women here may get offended.
I was amused when I saw vicki's post. It was loaded with metaphors n I wondered if she really understood wat her dh said.

:whut:

I didn't say anything offensive wor.. readers do their own research.....

[limlim]

Chenonceau:

Alright... the full identity of this student is out.

from where?? source?

un-substantiate, aplenty. substantiated? Nil so far.. or maybe you can share share? :evil:

[limlim]

janet_lee88:

Much needs to be done to educate our daughters. Keeping the virginity for the one she marries is not just respecting herself. It speaks a lot about her. A man who truly loves her will respect her.

That's true. couldn't agree more..

[Way2GO]

limlim:

I disagree. I believe the law has its purpose.

A biz transaction is different from \"freedom\" to choose what you want to do.

for e.g. chewing gum is legal. But selling it is illegal.

A kid matching 4D tickets to results is legal. But selling bets to minor is illegal.

If they are > 16, it is deemed they are matured enough to have the freedom to do what they want \"willingly\". But there is a risk that they may be exploited due to their young age. By removing monetary factor, it may make them less vulnerable. So the law protects them, in a way.

As for whether this hen in particular deserves protection, that is subject to debate. If there exhibit signs that she is not \"exploited\" but is actually doing it intentionally and purposely for the sake of $$$$.. then, she may not be regarded and treated as \"innocent\" as what the law expected them to be.

I m not debating on d good intention of d law.
D age difference in d law is contentious.
Say a client has sex with a minor 18<age>16 n he is caught,
They turn ard n said they r bf/gf n no money exchange hands,
There is no offence – u see d loophole in d law?
d law needs to be tweaked.

d gahmen did dat with d law wrt to illegal moneylending,
they closed d loophole on delinquents being used to front loanshark operations.

[limlim]

Way2GO:

limlim:

So far no one is able to verify the credibility of the source.

It is at most, officially a rumour. IMO.

limlim, starting again abt its a rumour till solid evidence is produced? :evil:
Wat's yr source?

I don't hv credible source.. only saw those on HWZ.

Mebbe those from the bike forum ones seems more \"credible\".. (in some ways lah..).. but I can't access.. :sad:

[Way2GO]

limlim:

Chenonceau:

Alright... the full identity of this student is out.

from where?? source?

un-substantiate, aplenty. substantiated? Nil so far.. or maybe you can share share? :evil:

limlim, dis is getting a bit stale.
u digging for confirmation fr ur unsubstantiated source?

Her name oredi appears on new charge-sheets
- its verifiable.

Does it really matter to u who she is?

[Way2GO]

limlim:

I don't hv credible source.. only saw those on HWZ.

Mebbe those from the bike forum ones seems more \"credible\".. (in some ways lah..).. but I can't access.. :sad:

Ah, I saw dis post after I posted a reply to ur other post.
OK, gd u r being honest abt it.
I don't read HWZ unless someone refers to it in their posts.

If its impt to u, pm me.
But I will not provide d info if u r just being curious.

[3Boys]

Way2GO:

I m not debating on d good intention of d law.
D age difference in d law is contentious.
Say a client has sex with a minor 18<age>16 n he is caught,
They turn ard n said they r bf/gf n no money exchange hands,
There is no offence – u see d loophole in d law?
d law needs to be tweaked.

d gahmen did dat with d law wrt to illegal moneylending,
they closed d loophole on delinquents being used to front loanshark operations.

I agree with W2G that there is a certain illogic to it. Just does not sit intuitively.

[Chenonceau]

limlim:

janet_lee88:

Much needs to be done to educate our daughters. Keeping the virginity for the one she marries is not just respecting herself. It speaks a lot about her. A man who truly loves her will respect her.

That's true. couldn't agree more..

We all know that not everyone gets educated the same... different PARENTS... different schools.... different streams... different quality of education.

If we are talking about the lax morals of a 30 year old, I would have nothing to say. I have little good to say of the married woman with one child who slept with the 2 Home Team officers to sign a small teensy weensy deal of almost no money at all.

But this one is a child. To become a prostitute at 17, her sexual initiation must have started way before. WHO was it who seduced her at 14? 15? 16? Where were her parents when she was 13 or 14 and hanging out in malls till the wee hours of the night?

I went onto part-time work many years ago because of 2 things. I toured an SPF lock-up facility and saw a EIGHT year old little boy. 2 days later, The Husband and I stole some time to catch a midnight movie. On the way home, I saw a little girl with heavy make-up and a body that was beginning to develop in interesting ways loitering in the hallway to the carpark. I thought she must have been about 14.

These 2 experiences shook me. My daughter was scoring poorly at school. Teachers complained about her. She complained about Teachers. She was in P4. I quit my job and stayed home for a year. In one year, DD moved from bottom to top. She later went to a top school, and graduated from A levels with 8 distinctions. During one of her CIP involvement in Sec 3, someone (a man in his 20s) told her a joke she didn't understand. She came home to ask me. I have vague memories of the joke... something about a father peeing in a mothers mouth.

I HIT THE ROOF BIGTIME.

My DD is not a prostitute because I was there to watch over her sexual imprinting... to ensure that she understands the sexual eperience from MY viewpoint. I was the one who personally gave her the sex talk and I also do it for my son.

Do you think this 17 year old had a Mother like me?

[phtthp]

-