NUS law prof in CPIB probe over exchanging grades for sex
-
Way2GO:
I wonder why the gal confess - unless it is shown her \"work\" and \"sch performance\" is so lousy that it does not deserved an\"A\". Only if she confess that the prof will end up corruption case - no one else can prove that with all the evidence that she bought those as bribes. Both can insist it is a case of extra-marital affair or adultery which is not criminal offence.ChiefKiasu:
I'm only curious to find out how on earth the prosecution is able to come out with such a detailed list of charges, from the items and \"prices\" to the exact dates and accounts of the \"trysts\". It's unlikely such info will be volunteered by either party involved. Someone's very unhappy about these two people, that's for sure. There's much more than meets the eye, folks. Don't take things at face value.
d legwork has been done at CPIB before going to AGC whether to proceed with charges.
Interrogation techniques n collaboration fr multiple sources at CPIB level.
Involved parties may not admit at first shot, but will succumb when confronted with 'evidences'.
Not difficult to obtain n cfm those details once one party breaks down. -
CPIB where got so free check on her n everyone else’s work n performance as a routine.
Also manpower resources limited.
Many of these investigations r initiated after someone snitch or file a complaint. -
Way2GO:
Absolutely. Someone must have snitched on them. Someone with a big vendetta against either or both of them.CPIB where got so free check on her n everyone else's work n performance as a routine.
Also manpower resources limited.
Many of these investigations r initiated after someone snitch or file a complaint. -
I wonder how they’re going to prove that the prof gave the girl an A in return for sex and gifts. After all, this girl appears to be very bright, having been on the Honour List at RI and NUS. She could have handed in an A essay on her own accord. And those gifts could be no more than gifts from a mistress to her man? It seems clear that there is more to the case than meets the eye…
-
Way2GO:
Yup, agree with Way2GO on this. The exhaustive invest work and papers would have all been compiled before picking the pair up for arrest and/or questioning.ChiefKiasu:
I'm only curious to find out how on earth the prosecution is able to come out with such a detailed list of charges, from the items and \"prices\" to the exact dates and accounts of the \"trysts\". It's unlikely such info will be volunteered by either party involved. Someone's very unhappy about these two people, that's for sure. There's much more than meets the eye, folks. Don't take things at face value.
d legwork has been done at CPIB before going to AGC whether to proceed with charges.
Interrogation techniques n collaboration fr multiple sources at CPIB level.
Involved parties may not admit at first shot, but will succumb when confronted with 'evidences'.
Not difficult to obtain n cfm those details once one party breaks down. -
Buds, d pair wld hv also been brought in separately for questioning DURING d investigation stage.
Wouldn’t be surprised if info fr one is used to extract or cfm info fr d other.
Its one of d techniques used. -
jtoh:
I wonder how they're going to prove that the prof gave the girl an A in return for sex and gifts. After all, this girl appears to be very bright, having been on the Honour List at RI and NUS. She could have handed in an A essay on her own accord. And those gifts could be no more than gifts from a mistress to her man? It seems clear that there is more to the case than meets the eye....
Ya.. can't be a contract right? :siao: -
Way2GO:
Correct.Buds, d pair wld hv also been brought in separately for questioning DURING d investigation stage.
Wouldn't be surprised if info fr one is used to extract or cfm info fr d other.
Its one of d techniques used.
Separate rooms for questioning.
Shove one evidence. Break down.
Get another evidence.
The other one angry with pichiak lobang,
will offer yet another evidence. Until all is
out and documented (statement).. everything
will be re-submitted to AGC to next approve the
charges to be meted out. -
ChiefKiasu:
Uh-huh.. big time. :nailbite:
Absolutely. Someone must have snitched on them. Someone with a big vendetta against either or both of them.Way2GO:
CPIB where got so free check on her n everyone else's work n performance as a routine.
Also manpower resources limited.
Many of these investigations r initiated after someone snitch or file a complaint.
Either the one who didn't get the prof interested at all.. Or the one who didn't get an A.. or a colleague who never got asked at all. :siam:
It's within the inner circle. :scared: -
Way2GO:
Keeping SG 'corruption-free' is one of d tenets of PAP governance. It has to be seen to be so to keep d populace on their toes.
It's still good in my opinion lest people become complacent. Especially ones who are always on top and think they're untouchable. Nip corruption in the bud or rather buds.. judging from the many recent exposès of late.
However, truth be told its not just exchange for sexual favours la in corruption cases. There are exchanges of other kinds just that so happen it has been the \"body favours\" being somewhat a trend of late that has been unearthed.
Wohhh boi... expect more worms to be dug out.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login