Former SCDF and CNB chiefs arrested

[watmekiasu]

limlim:

Anyway, I guess that's not how the WC works. Adultery has little bearing on the outcome of the amount.. Some men are known to pay a hefty sum of money even if it is clearly the women who strayed..

If she wants big money for alimony, I'm sure the husband would be willing to fight it out in court and air her dirty laundry. Or she could slip quietly away with little or nothing.

I don't agree that women stray because of lack of attention fm husband. She seems to have done it to further her career. Women do it for the power they have over men too.

[mamago]

Thank you, verykiasumummy... just discovered the thread with soooo many emoticons...


Apologies, :offtopic: again!

[friendship]

whatever C confessed with CPIB didn’t tally with the last 4 days statement.


Making CPIB officers like a fool.

Can anyhow tell lies in the court one mah?

[Dreamaurora]

friendship:

whatever C confessed with CPIB didn't tally with the last 4 days statement.


Making CPIB officers like a fool.

Can anyhow tell lies in the court one mah?

To be honest I am really surprised C is not charged with perjury. But I guess she can claim that she is emotionally distressed.

[phtthp]

friendship:

whatever C confessed with CPIB didn't tally with the last 4 days statement.


Making CPIB officers like a fool.

Can anyhow tell lies in the court one mah?

http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/will-key-witness-cecilia-sue-end-being-charged-20121003

http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/ng-boon-gay-trial/story/cecilia-sue-really-the-victim-20121002

need to call in more witness(es):-
http://www.todayonline.com/Singapore/EDC121002-0000134/Prosecution-to-assess-need-for-more-witnesses-in-ex-CNB-chiefs-trial

[janet88]

If Gay walks free, it will be a complete embarrassment to the govt.


This stupid case is already taking up so much space in the ST...why reporters so bo liau to interview people on the road as well ? :slapshead:

[AC_Power]

bezzlay:

I pity Sue, while both did something suspiciously wrong, she got all the blames from public while some still believe Gay is innocent and he is always accompanied by his wife in the court's hearings. I believe Gay might have hurt both women in the process, but there is no empathy and only blames.

I pity her too.

Yes, she has strayed. She had been involved with another man. But why must she be placed on the spotlight and forced to make public her affairs? Just because the state want to nail that NBG?

I do not condone corruption but I do believe CPIB should look at the case more closely if the \"gratification\" is in the form form of sex.

If they have been intimately involved since 2009, why is it that the 4 counts of oral sex are termed as gratification while their other \"sexcapades\" are not? It doesn't make sense to me at all.

Did they also find out about the 2 tenders awarded. Did NBG influenced it in any way? At his level, he will probably sign off the tender based on the recommendation from the procurement team. So far, I have never dealt with any Directors of Home Team department in my various IT tenders with them. They have all the project managers to handle it. If you ask me, those who can influence the tender, are the project managers, not the Directors.

[janet88]

CPIB can’t find another person to nail Gay ?

Sue may have strayed but why put her on the public chopping board ? Gay hurt 2 women and is NOT apologetic at all.

[Sun_2010]

AC_Power:

bezzlay:

I pity Sue, while both did something suspiciously wrong, she got all the blames from public while some still believe Gay is innocent and he is always accompanied by his wife in the court's hearings. I believe Gay might have hurt both women in the process, but there is no empathy and only blames.

I pity her too.

Yes, she has strayed. She had been involved with another man. But why must she be placed on the spotlight and forced to make public her affairs? Just because the state want to nail that NBG?

I do not condone corruption but I do believe CPIB should look at the case more closely if the \"gratification\" is in the form form of sex.

If they have been intimately involved since 2009, why is it that the 4 counts of oral sex are termed as gratification while their other \"sexcapades\" are not? It doesn't make sense to me at all.

Yeah, strange

Did they also find out about the 2 tenders awarded. Did NBG influenced it in any way? At his level, he will probably sign off the tender based on the recommendation from the procurement team. So far, I have never dealt with any Directors of Home Team department in my various IT tenders with them. They have all the project managers to handle it. If you ask me, those who can influence the tender, are the project managers, not the Directors.
What about the influence of the director on the project manager ? Both explicitly and indirectly. Difficult to prove or disprove.

If Gay's wife were the one working for a company and she was involved in a tender process for which he was the approving authority, then he should declare it, I think. There is a conflict of interest. Why should it be any different even if it is an EMA?

Having an EMA is not a crime. But when a man with his influence is involved with one who could benefit from his official capacity, it his responsibility to have it stated , it seems to me.

[Daddy D]

http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/will-key-witness-cecilia-sue-end-being-charged-20121003

[quote]If she told the truth in court, she had to be lying to the CPIB on multiple occasions. Making false statements to the bureau is a crime under the Penal Code and offenders can be jailed for up to a year and/or fined up to $5,000.

If, on the other hand, she told the truth to the CPIB and lied in court, she could be accused of perjury, an offence which carries up to seven years in jail and a fine.[/quote]Maybe she not stupid after all... Take the lesser penalty?
Adjourned to 31 Oct... :snooze: