DSA 2011
-
Yes I really will like to know whether is it "legal" for them to do away with WL? Plain inefficiency. Does that mean we have to call MOE?
I was joking with a parent that when the kids go to NJC and are not able to meet their deadlines. They can always say it’s okay - neither did NJC! LOL! -
hipomum:
suecat:
[quote=\"3satay\"]I don't understand why NJC has done away with WL. It is such a let down and disappointment for the other kids who went thru the whole dsa process. What makes NJC such an exception that they have done away with WL?
The least they could do was to post the rejection letters together with the co since they were quite close to the deadline. Thought moe website stipulate that all applicants will be informed of the outcome by 3 sept. Quite unprofessional of them. It could had spared us the agony of still pinning for some hope over the last weekend! Really unhappy with them. :mad:
During the tour of the sch, the dean said that if the applicants for their dsa doesn't meet the requirement , they may not even fill up half of their quotas for enrollment but will keep these vacancies for the sec 1 posting exercise. Looks like they are really strict about the quality of students that they pick ! :spank:
Seems strange that nobody in this KS forum got CO from NJC .... How come huh
Tmr I will give a call n check why the school did not post out the letters at a go! Apart from that, it is 'legal' for them to do away with WL? Any comments? Would like to find out more b4 I query the school[/quote]There is no rules to say IP school has to issue WL - it is solely up to the school. If the school feels that they have many worthy DSA applicants and want to offer WL to those as there may be rejections from COs issued, they can offer WL. Else they can pass the vacancies to PSLE posting later.
I think NJC in \"delaying\" their selection camp has already \"eliminated\" a group of applicants who have received COs from their preferred schools. As such, they can be sure those they provided COs are sincere in wanting to get into their school (of course, there are also some who has received WL from other school, and hoping to get a CO at hand amongst these). By not providing waitlist, they will just have more vacancies for S1 posting based on results, and that may be good for the standard of the school. Each school wants to attract the best and maintain their standard, so they will act in whichever way they think is appropriate for the benefit of the school. I really do not think it is \"inappropriate\" for a school not to issue WL - I believe there are sch that does not issue WL (eg. does anyone know if VS has a WL? I've not heard of a WL offer from VS yet!) -
My son has received a CO from NJC last Fri. The wait was definitely agonizing. The letter says that they have adopted a very stringent selection criteria. I understand from the school that all successful candidates would have received the COs by last Sat. Apparrently the delay for releasing the results was due to the fact that all the papers were sent to Australia for marking. Agree that they should have sent out all sucessful and rejection letters at the same time.
-
Dnls_mum:
My son has received a CO from NJC last Fri. The wait was definitely agonizing. The letter says that they have adopted a very stringent selection criteria. I understand from the school that all successful candidates would have received the COs by last Sat. Apparrently the delay for releasing the results was due to the fact that all the papers were sent to Australia for marking. Agree that they should have sent out all sucessful and rejection letters at the same time.
:congrats: to Dnls_mum and ds for NJC CO!
My Gal Told Me So Far She Only Heard of 1 CO from NJC for her Classmate, even though there were 4 Gals tt she knew has gone for the Camp. -
Dnls_mum:
My son has received a CO from NJC last Fri. The wait was definitely agonizing. The letter says that they have adopted a very stringent selection criteria. I understand from the school that all successful candidates would have received the COs by last Sat. Apparrently the delay for releasing the results was due to the fact that all the papers were sent to Australia for marking. Agree that they should have sent out all sucessful and rejection letters at the same time.
:congrats: to Dnls_mum and ds! :rahrah: -
Pen88n:
Pen88n,
I think NJC in \"delaying\" their selection camp has already \"eliminated\" a group of applicants who have received COs from their preferred schools. As such, they can be sure those they provided COs are sincere in wanting to get into their school
Each school wants to attract the best and maintain their standard, so they will act in whichever way they think is appropriate for the benefit of the school.
spot on, that is what I feel too. It was the same last year and previous years for NJC. Other more prestigious schools will issue early, and with their long WL, they have no problems with enticing the top students.
I am quite surprised by the emotional hype by parents who are still waiting for letter of confirmation. I think if we want to play this DSA option, we have to accept each and every school's own rules and choices. There will always be some rule or timing that someone is not comfortable with. Dont forget, their interview and camp schedule was around late Aug as well, even after most of the COs were given by most other IP schools.
NJC simply want to ensure that most of the COs given are genuine applicants who will want to go NJC, hence the usual late late show on the letter. Last year, DS also got his CO letter around 5 Sept.
Seeing how the weekend is just over, and they started mailing the letters end of last week, I think more parents can expect to receive NJC letters by Tuesday or Wednesday.
Already long necked, what's a day or two more ? Moreover, this is not suppose to be the main entrance avenue, the PSLE is. The DSA is just a bonus or shortcut.
But I hope some more parents' emotions will turn from being frustrated to joy in the next 2 days. Good luck
-
3satay:
agree that parents concerned should bring the matter to MOE's attention, perhaps not on the 'WL' issue but on the issue that NJC did not keep to MOE's deadline of informing parents (regardless of CO or Rej) by 03 sep!Yes I really will like to know whether is it \"legal\" for them to do away with WL? Plain inefficiency. Does that mean we have to call MOE?
I was joking with a parent that when the kids go to NJC and are not able to meet their deadlines. They can always say it's okay - neither did NJC! LOL!
03 sep should not be the last day for schools to send out their replies (for snail mails) but should be the last day for parents to receive their replies!
so if NJC had to send out their letters late due to some reasons, they should at least send emails/SMSes to the applicants by 03 sep! -
it is up to the individual school to determine how they administer the DSA process
if NJC have mailed the CO by last Friday, they have adhered to MOE guideline of by when the DSA result would be made known
there is no rule that they must have a waiting list
there is no rule that every candidate must receive a reply
some parents have noticed that NJC's test and interview is the last among all IP schools - to the extent that most other IP schools had already released their DSA results - success or otherwise --- in order to filter out those who are not genuine NJC applicants.......if such is the thinking, then it is a subtle unspoken confirmation of a 'second-class' mentality thinking that NJC is only a second choice / no-choice's choice ......
I hope NJC does not think this way
ok. do I see some stones coming my direction ?
:siam: -
Pen88n:
I really do not think it is \"inappropriate\" for a school not to issue WL - I believe there are sch that does not issue WL (eg. does anyone know if VS has a WL? I've not heard of a WL offer from VS yet!)
Same as NJC, there is no waitlist for 2011 DSA for Victoria-Cedar Alliance (VCA) integrated programme (IP).
VC's mum -
firefly38:
This is taken from the MOE website (FAQs for DSA Sec)
agree that parents concerned should bring the matter to MOE's attention, perhaps not on the 'WL' issue but on the issue that NJC did not keep to MOE's deadline of informing parents (regardless of CO or Rej) by 03 sep!3satay:
Yes I really will like to know whether is it \"legal\" for them to do away with WL? Plain inefficiency. Does that mean we have to call MOE?
I was joking with a parent that when the kids go to NJC and are not able to meet their deadlines. They can always say it's okay - neither did NJC! LOL!
03 sep should not be the last day for schools to send out their replies (for snail mails) but should be the last day for parents to receive their replies!
so if NJC had to send out their letters late due to some reasons, they should at least send emails/SMSes to the applicants by 03 sep!
17. When will I know the outcome of my application to each school?
You should receive a note from the school informing you of the outcome of your application during the Selection Stage by 2 September 2011. The letter will clearly state if you have been given a Confirmed Offer, or been put on the Waiting List, or that you are unsuccessful. If you have been placed on the Waiting List or given a Confirmed Offer in at least one school, you will receive a School Preference Form on 24 October 2011 after your PSLE examinations. You will have to make your preferences (maximum of 3 preferences) from 24 to 28 October 2011.
It clearly stated that the outcome should be received by 2 Sept not mailed out on 2Sept. I personally think that they have flouted the rules!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login