floppy\" post_id=\"1947827\" time=\"1574395605\" user_id=\"97579:
MsB_Luv\" post_id=\"1947815\" time=\"1574393685\" user_id=\"182449:Hello, I am new.
Just want to hear from some mummies here / school of thoughts for sec school with a wide COP vs a smaller range of COP.
~ wide range better/ narrow range
My personal tot: Maybe that wide range, eg. 220-254. Maybe that school only have 1 student 254.
Anyone good in analysing such to interpret?
:thankyou:
There’s a reason why “analysts”
would prefer to look at median t-score instead of range of students’ t-scores or COP. You can get the info from MOE’s SIS.
As an example, you can look at Whitley for an example of a wide range of t-scores: 188 to 251 and Punggol as an example of a narrow range: 201 to 233.
Median of Whitley is 207 while Punggol median is 205.
If both schools are of a similar size, Whitley may actually have a stronger cohort despite having a much lower COP.
You can also contrast the above with Guangyang Sec, another school with a wide range of t-score: 188 to 251. Median is 203. If schools are of a similar size, Guangyang’s cohort could be the weakest of the lot, despite having a similar range as Whitley.
The reasons for the above are varied but location, familiarity seems to be a big factor.
P/S: why only mummies can answer?
Thank you. Ok, I will Google on MOE’SIS.
Sound complicated... on median scores. Will analyse.
The sch - jus neighbourhood, jus hoping for a better cohorts. So higher median would be better - ranger than looking at its range of COP, right?
:snuggles:
Btw, Daddy and mummies are all welcome!
Thank u all for ur replies & advices.