Logo
    • Education
      • Pre-School
      • Primary Schools Directory
      • Primary Schools Articles
      • P1 Registration
      • DSA
      • PSLE
      • Secondary
      • Tertiary
      • Special Needs
    • Lifestyle
      • Well-being
    • Activities
      • Events
    • Enrichment & Services
      • Find A Service Provider
      • Enrichment Articles
      • Enrichment Services
      • Tuition Centre/Private Tutor
      • Infant Care/ Childcare / Student Care Centre
      • Kindergarten/Preschool
      • Private Institutions and International Schools
      • Special Needs
      • Indoor & Outdoor Playgrounds
      • Paediatrics
      • Neonatal Care
    • Forum
    • ASKQ
    • Register
    • Login

    Any Updates As To When PSLE T-Scores Will Be Scrapped?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Primary 6 & PSLE
    1.2k Posts 1 Posters 247.3k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      sushi88
      last edited by

      floppy:
      pirate:

      [quote=\"floppy\"]

      Until MOE announces any concrete plans, any discussion is an exercise in futility.

      Must make noise first before the whole thing is set in concrete and it is too late. πŸ˜‰

      Are you a new Singaporean? πŸ˜†

      When have the G ever taken noise on the Internet into consideration before announcing their position?[/quote]I agree they do not take in noise but they will read feedback.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Reply Quote 0
      • P
        pirate
        last edited by

        floppy:

        Are you a new Singaporean? πŸ˜†

        When have the G ever taken noise on the Internet into consideration before announcing their position?
        Ever since KSP came into existence. You dunno KSP got special internet status meh? πŸ˜‰ :siam:

        1 Reply Last reply
        Reply Quote 0
        • G
          grimm
          last edited by

          I understand they started inviting affected parents (i.e. this year's P1) for focus group discussion on this. So there is a room for some modifications between and 2021.


          So if you really want to get views heard, there are ways. Probably not here though. πŸ˜‚ One wonders whether MOE considers these forums are boon or bane for them. :siam:

          1 Reply Last reply
          Reply Quote 0
          • phtthpP
            phtthp
            last edited by

            grimm:
            I understand they started inviting affected parents (i.e. this year's P1) for focus group discussion on this. So there is a room for some modifications between and 2021.


            So if you really want to get views heard, there are ways. Probably not here though. πŸ˜‚ One wonders whether MOE considers these forums are boon or bane for them. :siam:
            Yes, some primary schools' Principal / VP, may be holding talks to parents at school premises in Term 4, to only affected 2009 born pupils (current 2016 P1s) : pioneering AL Psle batch, on what to expect, lying ahead.
            Only to affected students, not to the entire school

            1 Reply Last reply
            Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jetsetter
              last edited by

              pirate:
              floppy:



              Until MOE announces any concrete plans, any discussion is an exercise in futility.

              Must make noise first before the whole thing is set in concrete and it is too late. πŸ˜‰

              Don't think we'll be hearing anything official from them until Part 2 - DSA distinctive progs (of this \"twin package\") is ready for announcement. If there're any further tweaks, it'll have to be after those FGDs that grimm and phtthp mentioned.

              MOE prefer to take discussions off the line, and they tend to like targeting at stakeholders only (c.f. IPJC saga) πŸ˜›

              1 Reply Last reply
              Reply Quote 0
              • P
                pirate
                last edited by

                jetsetter:
                MOE prefer to take discussions off the line, and they tend to like targeting at stakeholders only (c.f. IPJC saga) πŸ˜›

                Who are the stakeholders? :scratchhead: :imanangel:

                1 Reply Last reply
                Reply Quote 0
                • J
                  jetsetter
                  last edited by

                  pirate:
                  jetsetter:

                  MOE prefer to take discussions off the line, and they tend to like targeting at stakeholders only (c.f. IPJC saga) πŸ˜›


                  Who are the stakeholders? :scratchhead: :imanangel:

                  Those ksps with Ox kids, for now. Tiger mums and dads not likely, yet.

                  I dunno if they would make any modifications, seriously. The new scoring system looks like some top scholar's brainchild.

                  I believe the seemingly simplistic scoring system was from someone who's smart at manipulating our S$NEER monetary policy band, someone who's very talented in stats, math permutations and combinations πŸ˜› Above all, someone who firmly believes in the \"ESIAGS\" utopian motto and who takes OSC feedback seriously. Could also be a collective effort by a team of thinkers, or a big idea that was mooted by a great thinker but pieced together by a team of thinkers. 🀷

                  But certainly can't be from the incumbent. He doesn't sound convicted when he talks about it in Parl and on tv, like he knows it well enough to be able to defend and justify its technicalities sufficiently. He was only sworn in not along ago. Will he modify the system he's inherited? 🀷

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Reply Quote 0
                  • P
                    pirate
                    last edited by

                    jetsetter:
                    pirate:

                    [quote=\"jetsetter\"]MOE prefer to take discussions off the line, and they tend to like targeting at stakeholders only (c.f. IPJC saga) πŸ˜›


                    Who are the stakeholders? :scratchhead: :imanangel:

                    Those ksps with Ox kids, for now. Tiger mums and dads not likely, yet.[/quote]So Richard Watterson can continue to sleep? πŸ˜†

                    https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-wvxf_IqTgo8/VOSZjjq5cdI/AAAAAAAA2gw/RcgLMIVQBsE/w427-h220/tumblr_ms31dfIUE31s06lwjo1_500.gif\">

                    Wait... can define stakeholders like that one meh? :?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply Quote 0
                    • phtthpP
                      phtthp
                      last edited by

                      jetsetter:
                      MOE prefer to take discussions off the line, and they tend to like targeting at stakeholders only (c.f. IPJC saga) :-


                      Those ksps with Ox kids, for now.
                      Tiger mums and dads not likely, yet.
                      children of Tiger mom and dad, officially starting Primary 1 next year (2017 January)

                      so, Tiger mom & dad still \"blur-blur\" : not likely yet.
                      Tigers will look at what Ox mom & dad going to do, follow them.
                      Ox mom & dad are going to be leaders for kiddy (Tigers, rabbits, dragon, snakes, etc.)


                      anyway, some primary schools like Principal of Red Swastika primary have already informed the affected 2016 P1 parents : to come down for a briefing in Term 3, on Saturday (27 August 2016), discuss more about the new AL PSLE Banding system (2021)

                      refer school memo
                      http://www.redswastika.moe.edu.sg/qql/s ... arents.pdf

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply Quote 0
                      • M
                        mum_sugoku
                        last edited by

                        phtthp:


                        refer school memo
                        http://www.redswastika.moe.edu.sg/qql/s ... arents.pdf
                        In the school's memo, it says
                        [quote]a. Replacing the T-score with wider scoring bands known as Achievement Levels, to reduce the fine differentiation of students at a young age based on exam scores;

                        b. Moving towards a scoring system that better reflects students’ own level of achievement instead of comparing them to their peers (unlike the T-score);
                        [/quote]But in Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board's FAQ, it's already stated, quite clearly, that
                        http://www.ifaq.gov.sg/SEAB/apps/fcd_fa ... #FAQ_93279
                        [quote]4. What is the difference between a student’s grade and his T-Score?

                        The grade indicates how well the child has performed in that particular subject based on an objective set of standards. His Aggregate T-Score indicates how well he has performed on average in all four subjects relative to his peers and is used specifically for the purpose of determining the priority of admission to secondary schools and the eligibility/fit for the different secondary school pathways available. [/quote]

                        (Somehow it gives me the impression that MOE doesn't seem to know t-score's role in PSLE) :?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                        Register Login
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 117
                        • 118
                        • 119
                        • 120
                        • 121
                        • 120 / 121
                        • First post
                          Last post



                        Online Users
                        chooBGC
                        chooBG

                        Statistics

                        1

                        Online

                        211.3k

                        Users

                        34.5k

                        Topics

                        1.8m

                        Posts
                        Apps Shared on Our Forum

                        Maths

                        Ruiya.ai
                        math support
                        →
                        Tallytide
                        P1-P6 maths app
                        →
                        MugCorner
                        Sec 1-4 maths practice
                        →

                        English

                        tutor.agenticolab.com
                        P1-6 English portal
                        →
                        wordwizards.sg
                        English practice
                        →

                        Chinese

                        chinese.getbuzzi.com
                        P1-P6 Chinese
                        →
                        Wonder Chinese
                        P1-P6 Chinese writing
                        →

                        Multiple subjects

                        Pickytic.ai
                        AI study buddy for pri and sec
                        →

                          About Us Contact Us global:forum Terms of Service Privacy Policy