* Eunoia JC (EJC)

[1J2Ms]

Hi,


My son received CO by CHS for IP. He will be attending Eunoia JC in his year5&6.

Would like to ask parents to share experience whom kids attended or currently attending EJC.

Thanks in advance.

[comrades]

1J2Ms\" post_id=\"1930445\" time=\"1566353537\" user_id=\"179190:

Hi,

My son received CO by CHS for IP. He will be attending Eunoia JC in his year5&6.

Would like to ask parents to share experience whom kids attended or currently attending EJC.

Thanks in advance.

Ejc last year A level result was not impressive- Science result didnt churn out as good even with bulk from IP kids of CH, SNG, SCGS.

RP is only ~82 point which is 2nd last among the IP JCs and lagging behind non IP JC.
Better to be in CH OP which has high std then excel, then do A level in RI, HCI or other better JCs.

Also, theres a disparity culture bet JAE n IP students inside.
If u not from IP, some JAEs will take a while to mix n no sense of belonging.

[ilovelaksa]

comrades\" post_id=\"1932312\" time=\"1567069131\" user_id=\"180828:

1J2Ms\" post_id=\"1930445\" time=\"1566353537\" user_id=\"179190:

Hi,

My son received CO by CHS for IP. He will be attending Eunoia JC in his year5&6.

Would like to ask parents to share experience whom kids attended or currently attending EJC.

Thanks in advance.

Ejc last year A level result was not impressive- Science result didnt churn out as good even with bulk from IP kids of CH, SNG, SCGS.

RP is only ~82 point which is 2nd last among the IP JCs and lagging behind non IP JC.
Better to be in CH OP which has high std then excel, then do A level in RI, HCI or other better JCs.

Also, theres a disparity culture bet JAE n IP students inside.
If u not from IP, some JAEs will take a while to mix n no sense of belonging.

There’re also ‘disparity cultures’ in RI and HCI.
A level results is dependent on the O levels COP of the various JCs.
I think it is still premature to think of EJC in this way.
Hv you seen EJ’s new campus? It’s AWESOME!
I believe their COP will drop and results will be outstanding once they move in there : )

[floppy]

I can totally understand why the better students (in terms of O Level results) would not want to choose EJC in the last 2/3 years. Given all the good choices that they can have, why pick a JC that’s in an interim location, out of the way and very much outdated / worn down?


Hence, EJC has probably the widest gap in terms of academic ability between the IP and OP students among all the IP JCs. Results not being as great is hardly a surprised. With the new campus, and being closer to CHS and SNGS, two of the constituent schools, expect big things to come from EJC.

[Parent2008]

Would anyone be able to advice for EJC, how many percentage comes from the feeder school of SNGS, CHS and SCGS?

[comrades]

Delete

[phtthp]

Careermum\" post_id=\"1906120\" time=\"1555056197\" user_id=\"22005:

...

For EJC, you can look at last year's A Level results. EJC did well, on par with other IPJCs.

...

Actually

considering that 2018 batch (born 2000) being Eunoia Junior College first maiden flight into producing A-level results, EJC had indeed done very well, because her overall UAS (University Admission score) exceeded 82 points, very high !

However, if one were to analyze (scrutinize) deeper, what exactly pulled up EJC to score beyond UAS 82, is

because

Eunoia JC is very strong and powerful, in her A-level Humanities

As for her A-level ( Maths and Sciences ) :
There is still room for improvement

Thus, looking forward to see an improvement in EJC ( Maths & Science ) grade, for next coming A-level batch 2019 (born 2001) ... and these are expectations, coming from the Junior (younger) St Nick (Year 1 to 4) IP students and parents, besides just the awesome brand new infrastructure building, ready to shift end of December 2019


If EJC target ranking ...
is to become one of the Top 5 Junior Colleges in Singapore one day, going forward from today (2019)

Because i recalled a few years ago, that when EJC was formed, back then the ex Principal of SCGS ever mentioned before to several parents seated inside the huge SCGS auditorium, that they wanted to strategically position this new EJC, as one of the Top JCs in Singapore one day

Today, this ex Principal of SCGS, had gone to become Principal, of another IP JC

[comrades]

floppy\" post_id=\"1933521\" time=\"1567558709\" user_id=\"97579:

I can totally understand why the better students (in terms of O Level results) would not want to choose EJC in the last 2/3 years. Given all the good choices that they can have, why pick a JC that’s in an interim location, out of the way and very much outdated / worn down?

Hence, EJC has probably the widest gap in terms of academic ability between the IP and OP students among all the IP JCs. Results not being as great is hardly a surprised. With the new campus, and being closer to CHS and SNGS, two of the constituent schools, expect big things to come from EJC.

Its bigger 67% IPs feeder cohort vs its 33% JAE cohort, yet 2018 results were not as great.
Unless was 67% JAE at that time then its understandable.
Flaw in teaching depts, maybe.

[phtthp]

comrades\" post_id=\"1933690\" time=\"1567613706\" user_id=\"180828:

Its bigger 67% IPs feeder cohort vs its 33% JAE cohort, yet 2018 results were not as great.


Unless was 67% JAE at that time then its understandable.
Flaw in teaching depts, maybe.

Hi comrades,

For a brand new JC that just came on board, EJC had done pretty well. At least, her UAS had exceeded 82, which is very high !

what St Nick (IP and OP) parents hope to look forward to, is improvement in her A-level Sciences, for the next batch of A-level candidates this year (2019) and subsequent batches (2020 onwards), because being strong in A-level Humanities, isn't good enough. Hopefully, the Teaching department staff will re-visit how they plan to teach A-level Sciences curriculum, inside both IP curriculum from Year (1 to 4) in the 3 individual IP schools, plus inside the A-level curriculum itself, after the JAE students after O-level, had come on board

[floppy]

comrades\" post_id=\"1933690\" time=\"1567613706\" user_id=\"180828:

floppy\" post_id=\"1933521\" time=\"1567558709\" user_id=\"97579:

I can totally understand why the better students (in terms of O Level results) would not want to choose EJC in the last 2/3 years. Given all the good choices that they can have, why pick a JC that’s in an interim location, out of the way and very much outdated / worn down?

Hence, EJC has probably the widest gap in terms of academic ability between the IP and OP students among all the IP JCs. Results not being as great is hardly a surprised. With the new campus, and being closer to CHS and SNGS, two of the constituent schools, expect big things to come from EJC.

Its bigger 67% IPs feeder cohort vs its 33% JAE cohort, yet 2018 results were not as great.
Unless was 67% JAE at that time then its understandable.
Flaw in teaching depts, maybe.

When you say “not as great”, you probably may want to explain what is “not as great” or what is considered \"great” to you. As far as the published results had shown, which Esteema had done a comparison, EJC is producing the results that it is expected to produce.

Actually... if we take your EJC cohort breakdown at face value, EJC result is actually damned impressive. Considering that 33% of the cohort are from JAE (2017 intake COP 11/10), it’s average UAS of 82.4 is actually outperforming their expectation when you compared it to other JCs such as VJC average of 83.7 (IP and COP 8/6) and NYJC median of 84.4 (COP 8/7).