River Valley High School [*IP]

[Edureach]

Augmum


What you hear is correct. However, herein lies the big difference. Generally, there’s a big gap btw these two groups.

Its definately much easier to score a distinction at H1 level than H2.

[Augmum]

Edureach:

Augmum


What you hear is correct. However, herein lies the big difference. Generally, there's a big gap btw these two groups.

Its definately much easier to score a distinction at H1 level than H2.

Thanks Edureach......much appreciated for yr response.....

[justsay]

Augmum:

Do you know how many Y3 triple Sc classes does the P plan to limit?

Err....If my memory din fail me, thought i read from here that the sch removed the option for 3 S, not limit the classes ?

For this year, the students are allowed to take triple sciences as long as they qualify. However the 3rd science is considered as elective and not counted in GPA.
It encourages only those who are really strong in science, have good time management and have the interest to take the additional subject.
As far as i know, those who met the creteria and opted were all granted.

[justsay]

onemore:

starlight1968sg:

Yes, the P knows more than us.

It is pointless to do triple Sc nowadays. The prob is which 2 Sc subjects to take, noting RV encourages Chem as one, which means we are left with either Phy or Bio.

I wonder if this is inline with other IP schools.

I was thrilled when the P mentioned that we should not compare our revised curriculum with a non-IP sch (as suggested by a parent) but with a \"good\" IP sch

Triple Sc combi is still a popular choice in many schools for Y3 – including the “good” IP sch.

Do you know how many Y3 triple Sc classes does the P plan to limit?

Why is it that triple sciences still a popular choice, is it because of the mindset that those who are taking triple sciences are the better ones?
I do know of some of my dd's friend chose not because they want it but rather their parents wanted it.

[CRYSTALRN]

For the Revised Curriculum Structure, my understanding is that the school doesn’t change a lot. As for GPA percentile, the 30-75% and top 25% can combine any subjects as before. The low 30%, however, are asked to cut down their subjects for long-run benefit, A-Level.


From the perspectives of curriculum revision, I personally prefer more support to Olympiads and more hours in English writing for lower levels.

[MandyMummy]

justsay:

onemore:

[quote=\"starlight1968sg\"]Yes, the P knows more than us.

It is pointless to do triple Sc nowadays. The prob is which 2 Sc subjects to take, noting RV encourages Chem as one, which means we are left with either Phy or Bio.

I wonder if this is inline with other IP schools.

I was thrilled when the P mentioned that we should not compare our revised curriculum with a non-IP sch (as suggested by a parent) but with a \"good\" IP sch

Triple Sc combi is still a popular choice in many schools for Y3 – including the “good” IP sch.

Do you know how many Y3 triple Sc classes does the P plan to limit?

Why is it that triple sciences still a popular choice, is it because of the mindset that those who are taking triple sciences are the better ones?
I do know of some of my dd's friend chose not because they want it but rather their parents wanted it.[/quote]It is in their mindset or their parent's. Also science is a popular combination at JC level because it allows you to venture into almost all disciplines in the uni. So if one wants to do science and is undecided as to what sciences to do, it is better to take 3 sciences at years 3&4 to know one's aptitude and interest.

[starlight1968sg]

The mindset of parents should be updated.

I would seriously prefer my girl (now Y1) to do 2 Sc, 1 (history or geo) and 1 (3rd lang) at H2 level, if she can cope. Otherwise 2 Sc and 1 humanity at H2 would be fine too.

[starlight1968sg]

Augmum:

Hi Edureach,

Glad that u are here....,
Wanna to ask u .....what is yr view of taking only 3 H2 even if the pupil is eligible for 4 H2?
Better time management ?

Allow me to share
I would suggest to take 4H2 unless otherwise.
Doing a subject at H2 level would give our child a deeper understanding (in Sc) or a better command (in art) in that subject concerned.

[starlight1968sg]

CRYSTALRN:

For the Revised Curriculum Structure, my understanding is that the school doesn't change a lot. As for GPA percentile, the 30-75% and top 25% can combine any subjects as before. The low 30%, however, are asked to cut down their subjects for long-run benefit, A-Level.

This is the \"beauty\" of an IP school.
The P or sch calls the shot and can start preparing for A level earlier.

[Augmum]

justsay:

Augmum:

Do you know how many Y3 triple Sc classes does the P plan to limit?

Err....If my memory din fail me, thought i read from here that the sch removed the option for 3 S, not limit the classes ?

For this year, the students are allowed to take triple sciences as long as they qualify. However the 3rd science is considered as elective and not counted in GPA.
It encourages only those who are really strong in science, have good time management and have the interest to take the additional subject.
As far as i know, those who met the creteria and opted were all granted.

But if it is only considered as an elective and cannot be computed in the GPA,
then the pupils still need to take another humanities subj, which means a much heavier workload to them.