* Eunoia JC (EJC)
-
sinoboy:
Did you attend the dialogue personally?
Knowing how many students exactly you can always ask MOE.Jennifer:
If a student has a T-score that is well eligible to enter other IP schools but chose to put the affiliated sec sch IP as first choice, then I feel that this is not asking for upgrade in the present circumstances.
What do you think - still an upgrade?
Those parents in the dialogue session who made this remark, do their child belong to the above category?
Who knows?
No one in this thread would have this piece of information, right?
Why no parent who thinks a transfer is inappropriate but didn't speak up at the dialogue session against those agitated parents who demanded the transfer nobody knows.
An upgrade or transfer or whatever you call it is not right and not a right. When you have chosen this school after psle you have given up your opportunity for other schools. You don't a right to go back and choose another school. If another school agrees to take in the student after some entrance test then so be it, but saying MOE break promise blah blah blah.... to get direct transfer... :siao: -
Jennifer:
Did you attend the dialogue personally?[/quote]While I don't see how going to the dialogue session or not is related to this, and this is just a minor issue for a very small minority, I get the message and I'll shut up. :skeptical:
Knowing how many students exactly you can always ask MOE.sinoboy:
[quote=\"Jennifer\"]If a student has a T-score that is well eligible to enter other IP schools but chose to put the affiliated sec sch IP as first choice, then I feel that this is not asking for upgrade in the present circumstances.
What do you think - still an upgrade?
Those parents in the dialogue session who made this remark, do their child belong to the above category?
Who knows?
No one in this thread would have this piece of information, right?
Why no parent who thinks a transfer is inappropriate but didn't speak up at the dialogue session against those agitated parents who demanded the transfer nobody knows.
An upgrade or transfer or whatever you call it is not right and not a right. When you have chosen this school after psle you have given up your opportunity for other schools. You don't a right to go back and choose another school. If another school agrees to take in the student after some entrance test then so be it, but saying MOE break promise blah blah blah.... to get direct transfer... :siao: -
Of course it matter, from your posts i would have thought that you were part of the actions!
-
sinoboy:
It matters as to correctness of the information you posted in this thread about the dialogue.Jennifer:
Did you attend the dialogue personally?
While I don't see how going to the dialogue session or not is related to this, and this is just a minor issue for a very small minority, I get the message and I'll shut up. :skeptical:
I wont ask the question : How MANY in numbers anymore, since you wont have the information at all.
Btw, you are free to share your thoughts and feelings about issues. There is no hidden message in my posts to tell you to shut up.
If I want to tell somebody to shut up, I will do it in his face. Wont be hidden. -
Lani:
I really hope that the unaffected parents can put themselves in other people shoes.
From what I heard, one of the principals of the 3 affected sec schools actually declared that the new JC ranking would surpass the top JC during the first Open House when IP was introduced in the school. This had attracted some parents to forgo the top JC and chose this school.
With this turn of events, some affected parents now wish to transfer their kids to the top JC they initially qualified. I believe this is not acceptable to some unaffected parents who view these affected parents as victims of their own greed.
It may only apply to a very small group but we can't deny it exists. Hence not everyone can empathize with the affected parents. -
blurblob11:
Lani:
I really hope that the unaffected parents can put themselves in other people shoes.
From what I heard, one of the principals of the 3 affected sec schools actually declared that the new JC ranking would surpass the top JC during the first Open House when IP was introduced in the school. This had attracted some parents to forgo the top JC and chose this school.
With this turn of events, some affected parents now wish to transfer their kids to the top JC they initially qualified. I believe this is not acceptable to some unaffected parents who view these affected parents as victims of their own greed.
It may only apply to a very small group but we can't deny it exists. Hence not everyone can empathize with the affected parents.
Which P declared that ? this is considered as misrepresentation ! If you buy financial products based on misrepresentation, you can seek for recourse, compensation and report to case and probably MAS! -
cherryc:
blurblob11:
[quote=\"Lani\"]I really hope that the unaffected parents can put themselves in other people shoes.
From what I heard, one of the principals of the 3 affected sec schools actually declared that the new JC ranking would surpass the top JC during the first Open House when IP was introduced in the school. This had attracted some parents to forgo the top JC and chose this school.
With this turn of events, some affected parents now wish to transfer their kids to the top JC they initially qualified. I believe this is not acceptable to some unaffected parents who view these affected parents as victims of their own greed.
It may only apply to a very small group but we can't deny it exists. Hence not everyone can empathize with the affected parents.
Which P declared that ? this is considered as misrepresentation ! If you buy financial products based on misrepresentation, you can seek for recourse, compensation and report to case and probably MAS![/quote]As mentioned, this is what I heard. Try asking the parents who attended the first Open House for IP to verify then.
I am sure the other principal(s) did mention they will place this new JC in top 3 ranking. Try tracing the KSP forums of the affected schools.
Parents of the current top 3 JCs will not be able to empathize with these affected parents too. -
blurblob11:
From what I heard, one of the principals of the 3 affected sec schools actually declared that the new JC ranking would surpass the top JC during the first Open House when IP was introduced in the school. This had attracted some parents to forgo the top JC and chose this school.
You mean surpass RI? No offence but I find it difficult to believe. -
blurblob11:
From what I heard, one of the principals of the 3 affected sec schools actually declared that the new JC ranking would surpass the top JC during the first Open House when IP was introduced in the school. This had attracted some parents to forgo the top JC and chose this school.
What I have heard from one of the principals 3 years ago was that this new JC would be rank top 3, not surpass the top JC. -
zbear:
which Principal (of the 3 schools) would dare to use the word, \"surpass\" the Top Junior College : when the first pioneering batch of students have yet to produce the \"A\" level results ?
You mean surpass RI? No offence but I find it difficult to believe.blurblob11:
From what I heard, one of the principals of the 3 affected sec schools actually declared that the new JC ranking would surpass the top JC during the first Open House when IP was introduced in the school. This had attracted some parents to forgo the top JC and chose this school.
perhaps this piece of info had been mis-understood, or been heard wrongly
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better š
Register Login