IP failures...has MOE been transparent?
-
Hi,
After reading today’s Straits Times article, "Tuition boom as kids prep for Integrated Programme", I feel that the Ministry of Education (MOE) has not been transparent in certain aspects.
Another area that I feel MOE has not been transparent is the number of IP failures. I don’t think there is any figure given by MOE on the number who have entered IP at Sec 1 and dropped out along the way or who have not done well at A levels (not done well = not accepted by the local universities). -
What have you gathered from the article that the MOE has not been transparent in?
-
jtoh:
What have you gathered from the article that the MOE has not been transparent in?
There is this part of the article which mentioned that MOE did not give figures on the number of places given to non-IP students in top JCs:
\"With the IP already running in several top JCs, they feel that students who do the O levels elsewhere will find it harder to get in because most of the places would go to the colleges' IP students.
The Ministry of Education (MOE) has given repeated assurances that these JCs are offering just as many places as before to those coming in via the O-level route.
But in the absence of hard numbers from the schools, parents have resorted to doing their own checks, and cite figures to explain why they worry.\" -
RI or HCI has told us during JC talks that before the IP system was in place, JC1 intake was 250. Now, JC1 intake from O level route is still 250. I have no idea how true this is though.
-
FanFanX:
I'm not that familiar with the issues, but is the figure that critical? Coz I think a good number of the IP students who get a place in the JC by virtue of the IP track would've made it into those JCs anyway right? So the actual number of places now available for O level students is not really relevant. What is really of interest is the number places going to those who might not have made it to the JCs without the IP. But these figures will be speculative.jtoh:
What have you gathered from the article that the MOE has not been transparent in?
There is this part of the article which mentioned that MOE did not give figures on the number of places given to non-IP students in top JCs:
\"With the IP already running in several top JCs, they feel that students who do the O levels elsewhere will find it harder to get in because most of the places would go to the colleges' IP students.
The Ministry of Education (MOE) has given repeated assurances that these JCs are offering just as many places as before to those coming in via the O-level route.
But in the absence of hard numbers from the schools, parents have resorted to doing their own checks, and cite figures to explain why they worry.\" -
MummyThreeStreams:
I'm not that familiar with the issues, but is the figure that critical? Coz I think a good number of the IP students who get a place in the JC by virtue of the IP track would've made it into those JCs anyway right? So the actual number of places now available for O level students is not really relevant. What is really of interest is the number places going to those who might not have made it to the JCs without the IP. But these figures will be speculative.
Think alot of S'poreans r just obsessed with numbers!
-
it appears to be like -
if parents worry that after O level due to insufficient places or find it harder to enter good JC, it is safer for children to take the Sec 1 IP track first instead of O level track, & hope that child can cope. if really can’t cope after try his best then no choice - switch back to O level track, half way through.
if like that, as time pass over the years, IP programme will get more & more popular, compared to O level.
how about the other way round ? is it very hard for O level track to join IP programme at Sec 3 ? must need what kind of high score then can switch over ? every Sec school different (not standardized) ? -
phtthp:
Personally, I would prefer to go for IP only if I'm sure my kid will thrive in that environment. It would be disruptive and a blow to a kid's confidence if he has to leave halfway through for O levels because he can't make it in an IP school.it appears to be like -
if parents worry that after O level due to insufficient places or find it harder to enter good JC, it is safer for children to take the Sec 1 IP track first instead of O level track, & hope that child can cope. if really can't cope after try his best then no choice - switch back to O level track, half way through.
if like that, as time pass over the years, IP programme will get more & more popular, compared to O level.
how about the other way round ? is it very hard for O level track to join IP programme at Sec 3 ? must need what kind of high score then can switch over ? every Sec school different (not standardized) ? -
So many just think of nothing else but IP?
Here are the advantages of those who qualify for IP but choose 0-level route instead:
1. Increasingly, its easier to excel in 0-level due to decreasing no of high quality 0-level candiates especially in the nxt couple of yrs onwards.
2. Choice to opt to polys on scholarships if they can find a course that interest them and move on to unis from here. This will also position them well for the work place in future.
3. Opportunity to embark on a matriculation programme overseas in a good uni’s preparation course vs- a-vs those on IP programme.
4. An excellent 0-level cert is well-recognised internationally whereas those who are unable to complete their IP hve nothing to show.
5. Even if unable to get a place in 1st tier jcs, still can proceed to top 2nd tier jcs as the latter also hve high proportion of students making it to local unis ie 85-90%.
A check with PSC and u will find there are a fair no of them winning OMS, SAFOS and even President scholarship. So opportunities abound, really doesn’t matter whether studying in IP or non IP, RI/HCI.
Agreed with jtoh that parents must be sure that their kids can excel in IP before embarking upon it. -
twilight:
RI or HCI has told us during JC talks that before the IP system was in place, JC1 intake was 250. Now, JC1 intake from O level route is still 250. I have no idea how true this is though.
it is not rocket science
each year the A level output by RI and HCI is at least 1200
so from 250 to 1200 the increase is 950
that means the 950 were from sec 1 IP, plus the 250 intake from O level = 1200
what is not transparent ?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login