200 SMRT bus drivers refuse to go to work over pay issue

[Imami]

limlim:

concern2:

What is meant by illegal strike? Which strike is legal in Singapore?

This

http://www.singapore-window.org/sw00/000310a4.htm
[quote]You became head of the NTUC and also remained a cabinet minister -- and Singapore remained strike free.

Yes. But in January 1986 I did sanction a strike, the first for about a decade. It was in the shipping industry where the management was taking advantage of the workers. I did not even tell the cabinet about santioning the strike. And some of them were angry with me about that. The minister for trade and industry was very angry, his officers were very upset. They had calls from America, asking what happened to Singapore? -- we are non-strike. I said: if I were to inform the cabinet or the government they would probably stop me from going ahead with the strike. It only lasted two days. Then all the issues were settled. It showed that management was just trying to pull a fast one. So I believe what I did was right.

[/quote] :goodpost: thanks Limlim. This is a good read. For some reason, late president ong is one of the few politicians who has a (small but) special place in my heart.

[pinky]

Fairy:

ChiefKiasu:

You read the news today? Got aircraft carrier coming already. That one big big wan. No need glasses to see.

Sigh.

My god.
What aircraft carrier???
Making mountain out of molehill?

May i know where did you read the news from? Couldn't find.

Hope our garmen learnt their lesson. Put them on pedastal & chidded us for being xenophobic?
\"Blood is thicker than water\"

the purpose of sending the carrier according to a netizen there :we shall see if they would still dare not to raise the wages :siao:

[pinky]

these driver have effectively ended a 26 year strike-free spell here.

:censored:

[bupashu]

last heard, Kai kai and Jia Jia also on strike in sympathy with their fellow country man

[bupashu]

SMRT said unlike bus drivers from Malaysia who are permanent employees, the Chinese are on a two-year contract with different terms. While their starting pay is lower, they get accommodation, utilities and transport to work.



http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/smrt-explains-salary-and-work-conditions-mainland-chinese-bus-drivers-

[janet88]

bupashu:

SMRT said unlike bus drivers from Malaysia who are permanent employees, the Chinese are on a two-year contract with different terms. While their starting pay is lower, they get accommodation, utilities and transport to work.


http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/smrt-explains-salary-and-work-conditions-mainland-chinese-bus-drivers-

The Malaysians have to endure the long and tiring journey to and fro everyday...and it's no joke at the causeway. The Chinese are provided with accommodation and transport...do they know how expensive it is to have a roof over the heads here in SINGAPORE?
One female Chinese mentioned being bitten by rats and space constraint in their dormitory. Even then, they should be telling respective person in charge and not go on strike. Totally illogical !!!

[Twinkies]

pinky:

Fairy:

[quote=\"ChiefKiasu\"]
You read the news today? Got aircraft carrier coming already. That one big big wan. No need glasses to see.

Sigh.

My god.
What aircraft carrier???
Making mountain out of molehill?

May i know where did you read the news from? Couldn't find.

Hope our garmen learnt their lesson. Put them on pedastal & chidded us for being xenophobic?
\"Blood is thicker than water\"

the purpose of sending the carrier according to a netizen there :we shall see if they would still dare not to raise the wages :siao:[/quote]
Really? :siao: netizen....

Offbeat.

That carrier if sold can buy our SMRT, but now is called to press for wages increment?

[concern2]

limlim:

concern2:

What is meant by illegal strike? Which strike is legal in Singapore?

This

http://www.singapore-window.org/sw00/000310a4.htm

[quote]You became head of the NTUC and also remained a cabinet minister -- and Singapore remained strike free.

Yes. But in January 1986 I did sanction a strike, the first for about a decade. It was in the shipping industry where the management was taking advantage of the workers. I did not even tell the cabinet about santioning the strike. And some of them were angry with me about that. The minister for trade and industry was very angry, his officers were very upset. They had calls from America, asking what happened to Singapore? -- we are non-strike. I said: if I were to inform the cabinet or the government they would probably stop me from going ahead with the strike. It only lasted two days. Then all the issues were settled. It showed that management was just trying to pull a fast one. So I believe what I did was right.

[/quote]Thanks, limlim, and those who helped to clarify my misconception.

[phankao]

bupashu:

SMRT said unlike bus drivers from Malaysia who are permanent employees, the Chinese are on a two-year contract with different terms. While their starting pay is lower, they get accommodation, utilities and transport to work.



http://www.straitstimes.com/breaking-news/singapore/story/smrt-explains-salary-and-work-conditions-mainland-chinese-bus-drivers-

But the FACT is that it is precisely because they are \"cheaper\", that's why we employ them. If we have to pay them same as Singaporeans - what's the point?!

Don't they remember the contract they signed? Thankfully China Embassy already stated yesterday that there is \"no breach of contract\".

[janet88]

Thank goodness their embassy explained to them. MOM should really haul mastermind to court. As for those who participated in the strike, they should be sent back once contract is over and blacklist them.