COP 2012 - For Secondary Schools in 2013
-
ACSI Express - 249 (non-feeder)
ACSI IP - 256 -
Pen88n:
I would say to try, you never know till you have tried.lena.aw:
[quote=\"RVHS\"]NYGH\t265
HCI\t261
DHS\t256
RVHS\t256
Is 256 for RVHS confirmed? I wanted to appeal for my gal but i think chances not high as she only scored 251.
Put in her achievements and what you think she can contribute to the school too. Sometimes for appeal cases, school look beyond just T-score and put emphasis on the kid's character and CCA too.
Again, also be realistic and go to the posted school with a positive mindset with your kid tomorrow. If you read my other posts, you will realise I kept emphasizing this as I personally think it is most important parents build in the right mindset in the kids so that they can start their sec sch journey with happiness and anticipation (and not disappointment!)![/quote]
Thanks for your advice. I know what you mean. This year has very tough and very stressful too. Nothing has been positive for us
-
alderbaran:
Cedar IP was 258 last year and not 249 which was the 'O' lvl COP. So it is a decline of 4 points for Cedar IP from 258 to 254. SNGC and SCGS had not IP last year. You are wrongly comparing the 'O' lvl COP with IP for 2013.School\t\t2013 \t2012\tChange
NYGH\t\t265\t262\t3
RI\t\t263\t261\t2
RGS\t\t263\t261\t2
HCI\t\t261\t258\t3
NJC\t\t259\t258\t1
MGS (IP)\t\t257\t250\t7
RVHS\t\t256\t254\t2
ACS (I) (IB)\t256\t255\t1
DHS\t\t255\t256\t-`1
SNGS (IP)\t255\t249\t6
CEDAR (IP)\t254\t249\t5
SNGS (O)\t\t253\t249\t4
VSS (IP)\t\t252\t247\t5
CHS (IP)\t\t252\t248\t4
SCGS (IP)\t\t252\t248\t4
MGS (O)\t\t252\t250\t2
SJI (IP)\t\t251\t242\t9
SCGS (O)\t\t251\t248\t3
CEDAR (O)\t251\t249\t2
CHS (O)\t\t249\t248\t1
BPGH\t\t246\t244\t2
ANDERSON\t246\t245\t1
VSS (O)\t\t246\t247\t-1
SJI (O)\t\t245\t242\t3
NAN HUA\t245\t243\t2
CRESCENT\t244\t243\t1
ANGLICAN\t242\t243\t-1
ST. MARGARET\t241\t240\t1
CHIJ (TP)\t\t241\t241\t0
NAN CHIAU\t240\t236\t4
FAIRFIELD\t239\t235\t4
COMMONWEALTH\t238\t236\t2
TKGS\t\t236\t235\t1
MARIS STELLA\t234\t232\t2
TKSS\t\t234\t233\t1
PLMGS\t\t234\t233\t1
XINMIN\t\t234\t235\t-1
ZHONGHUA\t233\t232\t1
PRESBYTERIAN\t231\t229\t2
DUNMAN SS\t230\t229\t1
CHIJ ST. THERESA\t229\t224\t5
JURONG\t\t228\t225\t3 -
alderbaran:
School\t\t2013 \t2012\tChange
NYGH\t\t265\t262\t3
RI\t\t263\t261\t2
RGS\t\t263\t261\t2
HCI\t\t261\t258\t3
NJC\t\t259\t258\t1
MGS (IP)\t\t257\t250\t7
RVHS\t\t256\t254\t2
ACS (I) (IB)\t256\t255\t1
DHS\t\t255\t256\t-`1
SNGS (IP)\t255\t249\t6
CEDAR (IP)\t254\t249\t5
SNGS (O)\t\t253\t249\t4
VSS (IP)\t\t252\t247\t5
CHS (IP)\t\t252\t248\t4
SCGS (IP)\t\t252\t248\t4
MGS (O)\t\t252\t250\t2
SJI (IP)\t\t251\t242\t9
SCGS (O)\t\t251\t248\t3
CEDAR (O)\t251\t249\t2
CHS (O)\t\t249\t248\t1
BPGH\t\t246\t244\t2
ANDERSON\t246\t245\t1
VSS (O)\t\t246\t247\t-1
SJI (O)\t\t245\t242\t3
NAN HUA\t245\t243\t2
CRESCENT\t244\t243\t1
ANGLICAN\t242\t243\t-1
ST. MARGARET\t241\t240\t1
CHIJ (TP)\t\t241\t241\t0
NAN CHIAU\t240\t236\t4
FAIRFIELD\t239\t235\t4
COMMONWEALTH\t238\t236\t2
TKGS\t\t236\t235\t1
MARIS STELLA\t234\t232\t2
TKSS\t\t234\t233\t1
PLMGS\t\t234\t233\t1
XINMIN\t\t234\t235\t-1
ZHONGHUA\t233\t232\t1
PRESBYTERIAN\t231\t229\t2
DUNMAN SS\t230\t229\t1
CHIJ ST. THERESA\t229\t224\t5
JURONG\t\t228\t225\t3
TJC IP 251 -
applepie299:
My friend's dd got 259 but didn't get into NJC. She called the school, was told the COP is 257, the admin staff asked my friend to call MOE to check. How come like that?RVHS:
NYGH\t 265\t\t
RGS\t 263\t\t
RI\t 263\t\t
HCI\t 261\t\t
NJC\t 259\t\t
RVHS\t 256\t\t
DHS\t 256\t\t
SNGS-IP\t255\tSNGS O LEVEL\t253
VS-IP\t 252\tVS O LEVEL\t246
I just called NJC. The COP for NJC in 2013 is 259 excluding HMT. -
Dunman high COP is not 255.
My dd has 256 (254 +2) for higher chinese but got posted to TJC instead.
Now gotto appeal to DHS cause all her clique going there.
I actually expected TJC COP to be higher. -
nav14:
Cedar declined by 4 points for IP track -
Cedar IP was 258 last year and not 249 which was the 'O' lvl COP. So it is a decline of 4 points for Cedar IP from 258 to 254. SNGC and SCGS had not IP last year. You are wrongly comparing the 'O' lvl COP with IP for 2013.
maybe because more new IP schools came up like SNGS and SCGS.
so some flock over to these two new IP schools.
thus, demand for Cedar fell this year. -
phtthp:
probably also because no of IP places went up from 90 to 160
Cedar declined by 4 points for IP track -nav14:
Cedar IP was 258 last year and not 249 which was the 'O' lvl COP. So it is a decline of 4 points for Cedar IP from 258 to 254. SNGC and SCGS had not IP last year. You are wrongly comparing the 'O' lvl COP with IP for 2013.
maybe because more new IP schools came up like SNGS and SCGS.
so some flock over to these two new IP schools.
thus, demand for Cedar fell this year. -
Magnumwalls:
perhaps you can check again with your dd school matesDunman high COP is not 255.
My dd has 256 (254 +2) for higher chinese but got posted to TJC instead.
Now gotto appeal to DHS cause all her clique going there.
I actually expected TJC COP to be higher. -
Magnumwalls:
I am also surprised at TJC's COP, considering that there were only 75 places left after 75 places were taken up for DSA.Dunman high COP is not 255.
My dd has 256 (254 +2) for higher chinese but got posted to TJC instead.
Now gotto appeal to DHS cause all her clique going there.
I actually expected TJC COP to be higher.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login